Determining effective distance learning designs through usability testing

To add to the developing understanding of Web-based writing instruction, we conducted usability testing to assess the design of our online first-year composition courses at a large community college in the Southwest. Beyond the course-specific results, this study offers two primary contributions. First, it offers a model for conducting usability testing of Web-based writing classes to diagnose potential design problems in a course. This includes providing an indication of what kinds of results and data teachers should expect to gather, how to interpret that data, where to go for assistance, whom to involve in the testing process, and what to do with the results. Second, this study provides an initial understanding of guidelines for course design using Web-based technologies. These guidelines were developed by examining writing classes in the study and then comparing the results with already established principles of design from usability engineering.

[1]  Chris M. Anson.  Distant Voices: Teaching Writing in a Culture of Technology. , 1999 .

[2]  Susan Kay Miller.  A review of research on distance education in computers and composition , 2001 .

[3]  Michael Simonson,et al.  Research on Distance Education , 1997 .

[4]  Jeffrey Rubin,et al.  Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests , 1994 .

[5]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[6]  Patricia Sullivan,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction Perspectives on Word-Processing Issues. , 1989 .

[7]  Jeffrey T. Grabill,et al.  On divides and interfaces: Access, class, and computers , 2003 .

[8]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  The pluralistic usability walkthrough: coordinated empathies , 1994 .

[9]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[10]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[11]  Cynthia L. Selfe.  Technology and Literacy: A Story about the Perils of Not Paying Attention , 1999, College Composition & Communication.

[12]  Patricia Sullivan,et al.  Opening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research Practices , 1997 .

[13]  Clay Spinuzzi,et al.  Light green doesnt mean hydrology!: toward a visualrhetorical framework for interface design , 2001 .

[14]  Cynthia L. Selfe,et al.  The Rhetoric of Technology and the Electronic Writing Class , 1991, College Composition & Communication.

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[16]  Deborah J. Mayhew,et al.  The usability engineering lifecycle , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.