The impact of information technology on individual and firm marketing performance

The perceived impacts of information technology use on firm marketing organization performance are examined. A theoretical model is presented linking organizational and end-user traits, information quality, system/service quality, industry traits, and tasks performed using a system to perceptions of organizational performance impacts through ease of system use, perceived individual performance impacts (i.e. perceived usefulness), attitudes toward using the system, and system use. The empirical examination uses a mail survey of US marketing executives to collect the data. The quantitative technique used is structural equation modeling. The results indicate that measures of organizational traits, individual traits, information quality, system/service quality, and tasks performed using the system impact perceived performance of the marketing organization mediated individual performance impacts (i.e. perceived usefulness), attitudes toward using the system, and system use. Managerial implications and conclusions are presented based upon these results.

[1]  M. Burke Strategic Choice and Marketing Managers: An Examination of Business-Level Marketing Objectives , 1984 .

[2]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Exploring the measurement of end user computing success , 1999 .

[3]  R. W. Stone,et al.  The impact of computerization on marketing performance , 2000 .

[4]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[5]  Eldon Y. Li Perceived importance of information system success factors: A meta analysis of group differences , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[6]  J. Lumpkin,et al.  The influence of psychological climate on conflict resolution strategies in franchise relationships , 1993 .

[7]  R. W. Stone,et al.  Working smarter: the impact of technology on marketer motivation , 1999 .

[8]  C Griswold Evaluating IT investments. , 1998, Health management technology.

[9]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  User Developed Applications and Information Systems Success: A Test of DeLone and McLean's Model , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[10]  Susan Gasson,et al.  The reality of user-centered design , 1999 .

[11]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[12]  Kai Mertins,et al.  Supporting order control in decentral manufacturing structures , 1999 .

[13]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Analysis of Information Technology Success in Small Firms in New Zealand , 1998 .

[14]  Seokwoo Song,et al.  An Internet-Mediated Market Orientation (IMO): Building a Theory , 2002 .

[15]  C. Carl Pegels,et al.  Managerial information system success factors within the cultural context of North America and a former Soviet Republic , 2001, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  D DavisFred Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , 1989 .

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[18]  Aniekan A. Ebiefung,et al.  Human factors affecting the success of advanced manufacturing systems , 1999 .

[19]  Olav Jull Sørensen,et al.  Internet and exporting: the case of Ghana , 2002 .

[20]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[21]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  Toward Development of the End User Computing Construct in a University Setting , 1993 .

[22]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  Adoption of electronic commerce tools in business procurement: Enhanced buying center structure and processes , 2002 .

[23]  Lawrence A. Crosby,et al.  Effects of Relationship Marketing on Satisfaction, Retention, and Prices in the Life Insurance Industry , 1987 .

[24]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[25]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Overlap of Opinion Leadership across Consumer Product Categories , 1971 .

[26]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Factors of success for end-user computing , 1988, CACM.

[27]  Michel Benaroch,et al.  Managing Information Technology Investment Risk: A Real Options Perspective , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[29]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[30]  Richard Cb Slack,et al.  Measuring the Impact , 1998 .

[31]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[32]  David J. Good,et al.  Technological teaming as a marketing strategy , 1997 .

[33]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success , 1996, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Ken Peffers,et al.  How to identify new high-payoff information systems for the organization , 2003, CACM.

[35]  W. Doll,et al.  The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work , 1999 .

[36]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Determinants of MIS employees' turnover intentions: a structural equation model , 1992, CACM.

[37]  Sherry D. Ryan,et al.  Information-Technology Investment Decisions: When Do Costs and Benefits in the Social Subsystem Matter? , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  Salesforce Socialization , 1986 .

[39]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[40]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Varun Grover,et al.  IS investment priorities in contemporary organizations , 1998, CACM.

[42]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[43]  IT Planning and Procurement — The Underlying Architectural Process , 1999 .

[44]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  High-Tech Capital Formation and Labor Composition in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: An Exploratory Analysis , 1992 .

[46]  Griswold C rd Evaluating IT investments. , 1998 .

[47]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  The relationship between user satisfaction and systems usage: empirical evidence from Egypt , 1999 .

[48]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Bonnie P. Stivers,et al.  Building a Balanced Performance Management System , 2000 .

[50]  David L. Paul,et al.  Assessing technological barriers to telemedicine: technology-management implications , 1999 .

[51]  Robert W. Stone,et al.  Computer technology and the marketing organization : An empirical investigation , 1995 .

[52]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Transforming failure into success through organisational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  R. Wayne Headrick,et al.  Measuring the impact of information systems on organizational behavior , 1999 .

[54]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[55]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Do norms of decision‐making styles, organizational design and management affect performance of Japanese firms? an exploratory study of medium and large firms , 1991 .

[56]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Hugh Macmillan Managing Information Systems: Three Key Principles for General Managers , 1997 .

[58]  Grant DuCote,et al.  A design of personnel scheduling software for manufacturing , 1999 .

[59]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Diagnosing information systems success: importance-performance maps in the health club industry , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[60]  Daniel J. Koys,et al.  Inductive Measures of Psychological Climate , 1991 .

[61]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND WAREHOUSING PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[62]  L. Jean Harrison-Walker,et al.  If You Build It, Will They Come? Barriers to International e-Marketing , 2002 .

[63]  Jinjoo Lee,et al.  Utilization and user satisfaction in end-user computing: a task contingent model , 1998 .

[64]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Factors Affecting the Loyal Use of Knowledge Management Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[65]  J. Ang,et al.  Exploring the relationships between user information satisfaction and job satisfaction , 1997 .

[66]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Technology acceptance in the banking industry: A perspective from a less developed country , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[67]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[68]  Ram S. Sriram,et al.  The Value Relevance of IT Investments on Firm Value in the Financial Services Sector , 2003, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[69]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[70]  Kaushalesh Lal,et al.  Information technology, international orientation and performance: A case study of electrical and electronic goods manufacturing firms in India , 1996 .

[71]  Gul T. Butaney,et al.  Distributor Power versus Manufacturer Power: The Customer Role , 1988 .

[72]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[73]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[74]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[75]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Consequences of Information: Institutional Implications of Technological Change , 2007 .

[76]  Mark J. Martinko,et al.  An Attributional Analysis of the Rejection of Information Technology , 1997 .

[77]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature , 1996, Adv. Comput..

[78]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[80]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Measuring the Organizational Impact of Information Technology Investment: An Exploratory Study , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Innovativeness , 1991 .

[82]  James Ang,et al.  User information satisfaction, job satisfaction and computer background: An exploratory study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[83]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..