Self-Concepts Across Two Cultures

This study compared the self-concepts of college students in India to those in the United States by administering the Twenty Statements Test. Self-statements were analyzed in terms of five categories (social identity, ideological beliefs, interests, ambitions, and self-evaluations) and a numberof subcategories (e.g., self-identity, group identity, gender role identity). Results indicated differential use of the categories and subcategories in the two cultures. For example, Americans made more self-evaluation statements, whereas Indians responded more in terms of social identity. Women in both cultures made more frequent use of stereotypical gender characteristics in describing themselves; men had a larger proportion of responses in the self-identity category. However, cross-cultural differences were much greater than gender differences. These findings shed light on major components of the self-concept and underline its culture-specific determinants.

[1]  Komilla Thapa,et al.  Cultural Differences and Cross-Cultural Similarities in Appraisals and Emotional Responses , 1995 .

[2]  K. Deaux.  From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[3]  H. Markus,et al.  Self-knowledge: An expanded view. , 1983, Journal of personality.

[4]  M. Bond,et al.  College Students' Spontaneous Self-Concept , 1983 .

[5]  M. Mines.  Indian Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Adult Stages of Development , 1981 .

[6]  J. Haley,et al.  Self-descriptions: configurations of content and order effects. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  B. C. Kennedy.  On Being a Woman -- Indian and American: A Comparative Study , 1973 .

[8]  Edwin D. Driver,et al.  Self‐Conceptions in India and the United States: A Cross‐Cultural Validation of the Twenty Statement Test , 1969 .

[9]  R. Ziller,et al.  Self-other orientations of Indian and American adolescents. , 1968, Journal of personality.

[10]  M. Kuhn,et al.  An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. , 1954 .

[11]  Mahzarin R. Banaji,et al.  The Self in Social Contexts , 1994 .

[12]  S. Stryker.  The self–society dynamic: Exploring the relevance of social cognition for the relationship of self and society: Linking the cognitive perspective and identity theory , 1991 .

[13]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[14]  H. Triandis,et al.  Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism. , 1990 .

[15]  S. Cousins.  Culture and self-perception in Japan and the United States. , 1989 .

[16]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[17]  E. Maccoby,et al.  Gender segregation in childhood. , 1987, Advances in child development and behavior.

[18]  A. Roland.  The familial self, the individualized self, and the transcendent self: psychoanalytic reflections on India and America. , 1987, Psychoanalytic review.

[19]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Mental Representations of the Self , 1984 .

[20]  Barbara Murray Eddings.  Women in broadcasting (U.S.) De Jure, De Facto , 1980 .

[21]  M. Kuhn.  Self-Attitudes by Age, Sex, and Professional Training , 1960 .