A More Realistic Scheme of Deviation Error Representation for Gas Turbine Diagnostics

Abstract Gas turbine diagnostic algorithms widely use fault simulation schemes, in which measurement errors are usually given by theoretical random number distributions, like the Gaussian probability density function. The scatter of simulated noise is determined on the basis of known information on maximum errors for every sensor type. Such simulation differs from real diagnosis because instead of measurements themselves the diagnostic algorithms work with their deviations from an engine baseline. In addition to simulated measurement inaccuracy, the deviations computed for real data have other error components. In this way, simulated and real deviation errors differ by amplitude and distribution. As a result, simulation-based investigations might result in too optimistic conclusions on gas turbine diagnosis reliability. To understand error features, deviations of real measurements are analyzed in the present paper. To make error presentation more realistic, it is proposed to extract an error component from real deviations and to integrate it in fault description. Finally, the effect of the new noise representation mode on diagnostic reliability is estimated. It is shown that the reliability change due to inexact error simulation can be significant.

[1]  Cyrus B. Meher-Homji,et al.  Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration. , 2001 .

[2]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Intelligent Fault Diagnosis and Prognosis for Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[3]  K. Mathioudakis,et al.  Setting Up of a Probabilistic Neural Network for Sensor Fault Detection Including Operation With Component Faults , 2002 .

[4]  Stephen Ogaji,et al.  Gas Path Fault Diagnosis of a Turbofan Engine From Transient Data Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2003 .

[5]  K. Mathioudakis,et al.  Comparison of Linear and Non-Linear Gas Turbine Performance Diagnostics , 2003 .

[6]  Igor Loboda,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Turbine Rotor Inlet Temperature Models , 2011 .

[7]  B.K.N. Rao,et al.  Handbook of Condition Monitoring , 1996 .

[8]  Igor Loboda,et al.  Neural Networks for Gas Turbine Fault Identification: Multilayer Perceptron or Radial Basis Network? , 2011 .

[9]  Igor Loboda,et al.  Polynomials and Neural Networks for Gas Turbine Monitoring: A Comparative Study , 2010 .

[10]  Igor Loboda,et al.  Diagnostic Analysis of Maintenance Data of a Gas Turbine for Driving an Electric Generator , 2009 .

[11]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data: Springer Series in Statistics (Springer Series in Statistics) , 1982 .

[12]  K. Mathioudakis,et al.  Bayesian Network Approach for Gas Path Fault Diagnosis , 2004 .

[13]  Mohsen Assadi,et al.  Condition Based Maintenance of Gas Turbines Using Simulation Data and Artificial Neural Network: A Demonstration of Feasibility , 2008 .

[14]  Mohsen Assadi,et al.  A Novel Correction Technique for Simple Gas Turbine Parameters , 2001 .

[15]  Mohsen Assadi,et al.  Different Condition Monitoring Models for Gas Turbines by Means of Artificial Neural Networks , 2009 .

[16]  Krishna R. Pattipati,et al.  An Assessment Methodology for Data-Driven and Model-Based Techniques for Engine Health Monitoring , 2006 .