Awareness in contextual cueing of visual search as measured with concurrent access- and phenomenal-consciousness tasks.

In visual search, context information can serve as a cue to guide attention to the target location. When observers repeatedly encounter displays with identical target-distractor arrangements, reaction times (RTs) are faster for repeated relative to nonrepeated displays, the latter containing novel configurations. This effect has been termed "contextual cueing." The present study asked whether information about the target location in repeated displays is "explicit" (or "conscious") in nature. To examine this issue, observers performed a test session (after an initial training phase in which RTs to repeated and nonrepeated displays were measured) in which the search stimuli were presented briefly and terminated by visual masks; following this, observers had to make a target localization response (with accuracy as the dependent measure) and indicate their visual experience and confidence associated with the localization response. The data were examined at the level of individual displays, i.e., in terms of whether or not a repeated display actually produced contextual cueing. The results were that (a) contextual cueing was driven by only a very small number of about four actually learned configurations; (b) localization accuracy was increased for learned relative to nonrepeated displays; and (c) both consciousness measures were enhanced for learned compared to nonrepeated displays. It is concluded that contextual cueing is driven by only a few repeated displays and the ability to locate the target in these displays is associated with increased visual experience.

[1]  N. Block Two neural correlates of consciousness , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  A. Kramer,et al.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D. Chalmers Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings , 2021 .

[4]  L Weiskrantz,et al.  Pattern of neuronal activity associated with conscious and unconscious processing of visual signals. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,et al.  Region segmentation and contextual cuing in visual search , 2009 .

[6]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[8]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[9]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Jeffrey S. Johnson,et al.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  Jaegwon Kim,et al.  Philosophy of Mind , 1996 .

[14]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[17]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[18]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[20]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Thomas Geyer,et al.  Contextual cueing of pop-out visual search: when context guides the deployment of attention. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[22]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Implicit learning of ignored visual context. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  David R Shanks,et al.  Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  I. Biederman,et al.  Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other? , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[28]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Contextual cueing under working memory load: Selective interference of visuospatial load with expression of learning , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  A. Lleras,et al.  Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. , 2004, Spatial vision.

[30]  B. Ramamurthi Concepts of consciousness , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[31]  H E Egeth,et al.  Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.