Intermittent turbulence and copepod dynamics: Increase in encounter rates through preferential concentration

Turbulence has a strong influence on plankton contact rate, which is a crucial parameter for plankton ecology. In the field of particle-turbulence interactions, it is now well known that fully developed turbulence does not always homogenise particle distributions, but instead creates, in some well-defined conditions, preferential concentrations of heavy particles. Many studies have considered the influence of this type of preferential concentration on particle contact rate. We consider here the possible application of these results to copepods, assuming that some results obtained for heavy particles are still valid for light particles. Using parameter values representative of copepod species in coastal waters and open ocean, we numerically estimate the possible enhancement of copepod contact rates due to the preferential concentration by turbulence. The assessment is done by using data from a laboratory experiment: we find from the trajectory analysis of small neutrally buoyant particles, that the preferential concentration effect increases the contact rate up to 140%. We argue that this effect may be more pronounced for higher Reynolds numbers, and may have important ecological applications.

[1]  Brian R. MacKenzie,et al.  Turbulence, larval fish ecology and fisheries recruitment : a review of field studies , 2000 .

[2]  V. M. Alipchenkov,et al.  Collision rates of bidisperse inertial particles in isotropic turbulence , 2006 .

[3]  T. Dickey,et al.  The fluid mechanics of copepod feeding in a turbulent flow: A theoretical approach , 1991 .

[4]  I. N. McCave Size spectra and aggregation of suspended particles in the deep ocean , 1984 .

[5]  John R. Fessler,et al.  Preferential concentration of heavy particles in a turbulent channel flow , 1994 .

[6]  Leonard W. Lion,et al.  Turbulent coagulation of colloidal particles , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  J. Titelman,et al.  Swimming and escape behavior of copepod nauplii: implications for predator-prey interactions among copepods , 2001 .

[8]  Jules S Jaffe,et al.  Swimming Against the Flow: A Mechanism of Zooplankton Aggregation , 2005, Science.

[9]  Sanjoy Banerjee,et al.  Numerical investigation of the effects of large particles on wall-turbulence , 1997 .

[10]  P. Franks Turbulence avoidance: An alternate explanation of turbulence‐enhanced ingestion rates in the field , 2001 .

[11]  D M Lewis,et al.  Planktonic contact rates in homogeneous isotropic turbulence: theoretical predictions and kinematic simulations. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  F. Schmitt,et al.  Turbulence intermittency, small-scale phytoplankton patchiness and encounter rates in plankton: where do we go from here? , 2001 .

[13]  T. Kiørboe,et al.  Blind dating—mate finding in planktonic copepods. I. Tracking the pheromone trail of Centropages typicus , 2005 .

[14]  J. Yen,et al.  Distal Setal Mechanoreceptors of the First Antennae of Marine Copepods , 1993 .

[15]  A. Wexler,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF TURBULENT COAGULATION , 1998 .

[16]  J. D. Bernal,et al.  Radial Distribution of the Random Close Packing of Equal Spheres , 1962, Nature.

[17]  Lance R. Collins,et al.  Reynolds number scaling of particle clustering in turbulent aerosols , 2004 .

[18]  A. R. Nowell,et al.  Encounter rate by turbulent shear of particles similar in diameter to the Kolmogorov scale , 1992 .

[19]  Francesc Peters,et al.  Turbulence increases the average settling velocity of phytoplankton cells. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  A. Cartellier,et al.  Effect of preferential concentration on the settling velocity of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  U. Frisch Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov , 1996 .

[22]  E. Meiburg,et al.  Small particles in homogeneous turbulence: Settling velocity enhancement by two-way coupling , 2006 .

[23]  Kyle D. Squires,et al.  Preferential concentration of marine particles in isotropic turbulence , 1995 .

[24]  J. Riley,et al.  Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow , 1983 .

[25]  K. Squires,et al.  Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence , 1991 .

[26]  Javier Jiménez,et al.  Ocean turbulence at millimeter scales , 1997 .

[27]  G. Falkovich,et al.  Acceleration of rain initiation by cloud turbulence , 2002, Nature.

[28]  Jakob Mann,et al.  Experimental Study of Relative, Turbulent Diffusion , 1999 .

[29]  J. M. Sancho,et al.  Plankton blooms induced by turbulent flows , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  R. Probstein,et al.  Coagulation in turbulent flow: Theory and experiment , 1975 .

[31]  Anthony S. Wexler,et al.  On the collision rate of small particles in isotropic turbulence Part 2. Finite inertia case , 1997 .

[32]  L. Collins,et al.  Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  A model system for examining the radial distribution function , 2004 .

[34]  E. Buskey Swimming pattern as an indicator of the roles of copepod sensory systems in the recognition of food , 1984 .

[35]  P. Saffman,et al.  On the collision of drops in turbulent clouds , 1956, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[36]  E. Loth Numerical approaches for motion of dispersed particles, droplets and bubbles , 2000 .

[37]  E. Michaelides Hydrodynamic Force and Heat/Mass Transfer From Particles, Bubbles, and Drops—The Freeman Scholar Lecture , 2003 .

[38]  Brian J. Rothschild,et al.  Small-scale turbulence and plankton contact rates , 1988 .

[39]  J. Yen Life in transition: balancing inertial and viscous forces by planktonic copepods. , 2000, The Biological bulletin.

[40]  M. Maxey,et al.  Settling velocity and concentration distribution of heavy particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[41]  André W. Visser,et al.  Turbulence-induced contact rates of plankton: the question of scale , 1998 .

[42]  A. Wexler,et al.  Statistical mechanical description and modelling of turbulent collision of inertial particles , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[43]  Turbulent particle flux to a perfectly absorbing surface , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[44]  M. Maxey The gravitational settling of aerosol particles in homogeneous turbulence and random flow fields , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[45]  A. Wexler,et al.  Modelling turbulent collision of bidisperse inertial particles , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[46]  J. Yen,et al.  Following the invisible trail: kinematic analysis of mate-tracking in the copepod Temora longicornis. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  André W. Visser,et al.  Hydromechanical signals in the plankton , 2001 .

[48]  C. Druet The fine structure of marine hydrophysical fields and its influence on the behaviour of plankton: an overview of some experimental and theoretical investigations , 2003 .

[49]  E. Saiz,et al.  Planktivorous feeding in calm and turbulent environments, with emphasis on copepods , 1995 .

[50]  Correlated light scattering by a dense distribution of condensation droplets on a window pane. , 1994, Applied optics.

[51]  J. Costello,et al.  Grazing in a turbulent environment: energy dissipation, encounter rates, and efficacy of feeding currents in Centropages hamatus. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  J H Cartwright,et al.  Dynamics of a small neutrally buoyant sphere in a fluid and targeting in Hamiltonian systems. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[53]  P. Vaillancourt,et al.  Review of Particle–Turbulence Interactions and Consequences for Cloud Physics , 2000 .

[54]  C. Meneveau,et al.  Hydrodynamic interaction between two copepods: a numerical study , 2002 .

[55]  J. Gerritsen,et al.  Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model , 1977 .

[56]  Lance R. Collins,et al.  Effect of preferential concentration on turbulent collision rates , 2000 .

[57]  S. Ott,et al.  An experimental investigation of the relative diffusion of particle pairs in three-dimensional turbulent flow , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[58]  Sean P. Colin,et al.  Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis , 1998 .

[59]  Claude Roy,et al.  Optimal Environmental Window and Pelagic Fish Recruitment Success in Upwelling Areas , 1989 .

[60]  G. Evans,et al.  The encounter speed of moving predator and prey , 1989 .