Future Data and Security Engineering

We propose a new parallel ensemble learning algorithm of random local support vector machines, called krSVM for the effectively non-linear classification of large datasets. The random local SVM in the krSVM learning strategy uses kmeans algorithm to partition the data into k clusters, followed which it constructs a non-linear SVM in each cluster to classify the data locally in the parallel way on multi-core computers. The krSVM algorithm is faster than the standard SVM in the non-linear classification of large datasets while maintaining the classification correctness. The numerical test results on 4 datasets from UCI repository and 3 benchmarks of handwritten letters recognition showed that our proposed algorithm is efficient compared to the standard SVM.

[1]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  IS Success Awareness in Community-Oriented Design Science Research , 2015, DESRIST.

[2]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  An empirical investigation of the salient characteristics of IS-Success models , 2006, AMCIS.

[3]  Thanh D. Nguyen,et al.  Structural model for the adoption of online advertising on social network in Vietnam , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI).

[4]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Humanistic approach to the representation of business processes , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[6]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Semiparametric Joint Models for Functional Predictors , 2009, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[8]  Flávia Maria Santoro,et al.  Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders' stories , 2010, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[9]  Manfred Reichert,et al.  How social distance of process designers affects the process of process modeling: insights from a controlled experiment , 2014, SAC.

[10]  Eric P. Xing,et al.  Sparse Additive Generative Models of Text , 2011, ICML.

[11]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Modeling highly collaborative processes , 2013, Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[12]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  E-Commerce Systems Success: An Attempt to Extend and Respecify the Delone and MaClean Model of IS Success , 2001, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[13]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Reviewing the quality of awareness support in collaborative applications , 2010, J. Syst. Softw..

[14]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Keys to Executive Information Systems Success , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Andrej Kovacic,et al.  Business renovation: business rules (still) the missing link , 2004, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[17]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Willard McCarty,et al.  Modeling: A Study in Words and Meanings , 2007 .

[19]  Sanjay Misra,et al.  Acceptance and Use of E-Learning Based on Cloud Computing: The Role of Consumer Innovativeness , 2014, ICCSA.

[20]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  An empirical investigation of employee portal success , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Guy Paré,et al.  Evaluating PACS Success: A Multidimensional Model , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Karl Cox,et al.  Predicting good requirements for in-house development projects , 2006, ISESE '06.

[23]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Incorporating domain knowledge into topic modeling via Dirichlet Forest priors , 2009, ICML '09.

[24]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Developing Collaboration Awareness Support from a Cognitive Perspective , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Questioning the philosophical foundations of business process modelling , 2014 .

[26]  Simha R. Magal,et al.  Attribution Theory: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Information Systems Success , 2014, Systemic Practice and Action Research.

[27]  Peter Trkman,et al.  International Journal of Information Management , 2022 .

[28]  Jon McCormack,et al.  Generative design: a paradigm for design research , 2005 .

[29]  Robert F. Dennehy The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge‐era Organizations , 2001 .

[30]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Replicated Softmax: an Undirected Topic Model , 2009, NIPS.

[31]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Thanh D. Nguyen A STRUCTURAL MODEL FOR THE SUCCESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROJECTS , 2015 .

[33]  Bruno Scarpa,et al.  Enriched Stick-Breaking Processes for Functional Data , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[34]  Hossein Mohammadi,et al.  Investigating users' perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Pedro Antunes,et al.  Enriching Knowledge in Business Process Modelling: A Storytelling Approach , 2016, Innovations in Knowledge Management.

[36]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  Measuring information output: A communication systems approach , 1978, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Modeling Documents with Deep Boltzmann Machines , 2013, UAI.

[38]  Arindam Banerjee,et al.  Gaussian Process Topic Models , 2010, UAI.

[39]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Optimizing Semantic Coherence in Topic Models , 2011, EMNLP.

[40]  John D. Lafferty,et al.  Correlated Topic Models , 2005, NIPS.

[41]  António Rito Silva,et al.  Using roles and business objects to model and understand business processes , 2005, SAC '05.

[42]  Atsuhiro Takasu,et al.  A Topic Model for Traffic Speed Data Analysis , 2014, IEA/AIE.

[43]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Exploring expert system success factors for business process reengineering , 1998 .

[44]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  The State of Research on Information Systems Success , 2009, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[45]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Research Methodologies in MIS: An Update , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Gibbs Sampling for Logistic Normal Topic Models with Graph-Based Priors , 2008 .

[47]  Thore Graepel,et al.  Kernel Topic Models , 2011, AISTATS.

[48]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of "IS Success" , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Thanh D. Nguyen,et al.  ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF CLOUD-BASED E-LEARNING , 2014 .

[50]  Ugur Demiryurek,et al.  Utilizing Real-World Transportation Data for Accurate Traffic Prediction , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining.

[52]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Recent Contributions to The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2009 .

[53]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Service Quality: A Measure of Information System Effectiveness , 1995, MIS Q..

[54]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Dimensions of Information Systems Success , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Models: testing hypotheses , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  Brendan T. O'Connor,et al.  Learning to Extract International Relations from Political Context , 2013, ACL.

[57]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Measuring enterprise systems success: the importance of a multiple stakeholder perspective , 2004, ECIS.

[58]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Examining the Success of the Online Public Grievance Redressal Systems: An Extension of the IS Success Model , 2015, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[59]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[60]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  The Design Theory Nexus , 2008, MIS Q..

[61]  Peter B. Seddon Implications for strategic IS research of the resource-based theory of the firm: A reflection , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[63]  Bing Liu,et al.  Topic Modeling using Topics from Many Domains, Lifelong Learning and Big Data , 2014, ICML.

[64]  Xinli Hu,et al.  Effectiveness of information technology in reducing corruption in China: A validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model , 2015, Electron. Libr..

[65]  Peter B. Seddon A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  Stefanie Rinderle-Ma,et al.  Change patterns and change support features - Enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..

[67]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[68]  Thanh D. Nguyen,et al.  PROPOSING THE E-BANKING ADOPTION MODEL IN VIETNAM , 2011 .

[69]  Arjun Mukherjee,et al.  Leveraging Multi-Domain Prior Knowledge in Topic Models , 2013, IJCAI.

[70]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[71]  Nils Urbach,et al.  The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success , 2012 .

[72]  Jan C. Recker,et al.  A Socio-Pragmatic Constructionist Framework for Understanding Quality in Process Modelling , 2007 .

[73]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success , 1994, ICIS.

[74]  Chong Wang,et al.  The Discrete Infinite Logistic Normal Distribution for Mixed-Membership Modeling , 2011, AISTATS.

[75]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.