Parental Partnership, Advocacy and Engagement: The Way Forward

This article, written with parents as co-authors, has two aims: (1) to provide a critical view of the English child protection system based on parents’ views and to locate these views within contemporary child protection studies and (2) to present the transformative value of co-production in the context of child protection studies both as a form of critical scholarship and as a means to influence policy and practice. The current children’s social work system in England does not achieve good outcomes for families, and many children and parents frequently experience it as stigmatizing, inhumane, and harmful. The article presents the experience and recommendations for change produced by parents with a broad range of experience with child protection services in England. The Parents, Families and Allies Network worked with five allied organizations in which parents identified the extensive range of problems that the current system presents and ways forward to achieve more supportive, humane, and inclusive practice with families. Seven main themes emerged: a better definition of need and response to need; partnership, participation, and humane practice; improving legal representation and support in legal proceedings; better support in care proceedings; permanence that maintains links; a better response to domestic violence; and the lack of support for disabled children. The article discusses five features of the project that supported meaningful co-production: taking a political stance, choosing clear and feasible aims, incorporating a range of knowledge, the participation of parents with lived experience throughout all phases of the project, and not settling with just knowledge production.

[1]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, The British Journal Of Social Work.

[2]  A. Chacko,et al.  Peer models for families involved in the child welfare system: a systematic review , 2021, Journal of Public Child Welfare.

[3]  Emily Keddell.  Towards a critical decision-making ecology approach for child protection research , 2021, Qualitative Social Work.

[4]  Mary Mitchell,et al.  Can Knowledge Exchange Forge a Collaborative Pathway to Policymaking? A Case Study Example of the Recognition Matters Project , 2020 .

[5]  D. Wilkins,et al.  What do parents think about statutory child and family social work services in the UK? , 2020, The British Journal of Social Work.

[6]  M. Gibson.  The shame and shaming of parents in the child protection process: findings from a case study of an English child protection service , 2020, Families, Relationships and Societies.

[7]  I. M. Bernedo,et al.  Review of benefits and risks for children in open adoption arrangements , 2020 .

[8]  J. Masson,et al.  England: Attempting to Learn From Mistakes in an Increasingly ‘Risk Averse’ Professional Context , 2020, Errors and Mistakes in Child Protection.

[9]  Kate Morris,et al.  Framed to fit? Challenging the domestic abuse ‘story’ in child protection , 2020, Critical and Radical Social Work.

[10]  G. Clapton.  Child Protection Anxieties and the Formation of UK Child Welfare and Protection Practices , 2020 .

[11]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis , 2019, Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health.

[12]  Kathryn Oliver,et al.  The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? , 2019, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[13]  A. Bilson,et al.  Adoption and child protection trends for children aged under five in England: Increasing investigations and hidden separation of children from their parents , 2019, Children and Youth Services Review.

[14]  Debra A. Dunstan,et al.  An exploratory study on open adoptions from foster care in NSW, Australia: Adoptees’ psychosocial functioning, adoptive relationships, post-adoption contact and supports , 2018, International Social Work.

[15]  Victoria Jupp Kina,et al.  The continuing relevance of Paulo Freire: celebrating 50 years since the publication of Pedagogy of the oppressed , 2018, Critical and Radical Social Work.

[16]  Emily Keddell,et al.  Outing the Elephants: Exploring a New Paradigm for Child Protection Social Work , 2018, Social Sciences.

[17]  Anna Gupta,et al.  Poverty, exclusion and child protection practice: the contribution of ‘the politics of recognition&respect’ , 2018 .

[18]  Calum J. R. Webb,et al.  Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions , 2018 .

[19]  B. Taylor.  Decision Making, Assessment and Risk in Social Work (3rd Edition) , 2017 .

[20]  Kristina Lovato-Hermann,et al.  Evaluating Parents in Partnership: A Preliminary Study of a Child Welfare Intervention Designed to Increase Reunification , 2017 .

[21]  M. Lalayants.  Partnership between child protective services and parent representatives , 2017 .

[22]  R. Wright,et al.  Children and Parent Participation in Child Protection Conferences: A Study in One English Local Authority , 2017 .

[23]  B. Daniel.  Challenges of child protection: Responding to child neglect , 2017 .

[24]  Matthew Wood,et al.  The Politics of Co-Production: Risks, Limits and Pollution. , 2016 .

[25]  R. Alaggia,et al.  Does differential response make a difference: examining domestic violence cases in child protection services , 2015 .

[26]  J. Warner.  The Emotional Politics of Social Work and Child Protection , 2015 .

[27]  Maria Kempenaar,et al.  Adoption Support Plans: exploring the processes , 2015 .

[28]  Nico Carpentier,et al.  Beyond the Ladder of Participation: An Analytical Toolkit for the Critical Analysis of Participatory Media Processes , 2016 .

[29]  J. Selwyn,et al.  Report: Beyond the Adoption Order: Challenges, Interventions and Adoption Disruption , 2014, Children and Young People Now.

[30]  S. Smith,et al.  THE CASE FOR ADOPTION SUPPORT AND PRESERVATION , 2014 .

[31]  J. Colby.  False Allegations of Child Abuse in Cases of Childhood Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) , 2014 .

[32]  David Tobis.  From Pariahs to Partners: How Parents and their Allies Changed New York City's Child Welfare System , 2013 .

[33]  Stephen Cobb.  Legal aid reform: its impact on family law , 2013 .

[34]  A. Summers,et al.  An evaluation of the effectiveness of a parent-to-parent program in changing attitudes and increasing parental engagement in the juvenile dependency system , 2012 .

[35]  M. Courtney,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of enhanced parental legal representation on the timing of permanency outcomes for children in foster care , 2012 .

[36]  M. Manby,et al.  Exploring the Experiences of Parents and Carers whose Children Have Been Subject to Child Protection Plans , 2012 .

[37]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[38]  Karen K. Yoshida,et al.  Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health , 2012 .

[39]  J. Berrick,et al.  ‘I am the face of success’: peer mentors in child welfare , 2011 .

[40]  E. Neil.  The Benefits and challenges of direct post-adoption contact : perspectives from adoptive parents and birth relatives , 2010 .

[41]  Donna M. Mertens,et al.  Transformative Research and Ethics , 2009 .

[42]  P. Beresford.  The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: from conflict to contribution , 2007 .

[43]  Joan Cocks,et al.  The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global , 2006, Perspectives on Politics.

[44]  D. Brodzinsky.  Family Structural Openness and Communication Openness as Predictors in the Adjustmentof Adopted Children , 2006 .

[45]  C. Bass,et al.  Fabricated or induced illness , 2006 .

[46]  P. Dale.  ‘Like a fish in a bowl’: parents' perceptions of child protection services , 2004 .

[47]  L. Townsend.  Open adoption: a review of the literature with recommendations to adoption practitioners , 2003, Journal of child and adolescent mental health.

[48]  E. Neil.  Contact after Adoption: The Role of Agencies in Making and Supporting Plans , 2002 .

[49]  Ian Butler,et al.  A code of ethics for social work and social care research. , 2002, British journal of social work.