Evolutionary Processes and Paths of Relationally Embedded Network Ties in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms

Relationally embedded network ties influence the economic decisions of emerging firms and evolve over time. Evolutionary processes and paths of these ties are examined based on two research questions: How do components of social relationships facilitate the evolution of relational embeddedness? What are the different paths to relational embeddedness? Findings from qualitative case study methods suggest three evolutionary processes (network entry, social component leverage and trust facilitation), four evolutionary paths, and the conclusion that ties entering the network through personal relationship may evolve more quickly toward full embeddedness. Strategic implications for emerging firms are suggested regarding entrepreneurial opportunity recognition, resource acquisition and effective governance of relationally embedded ties.

[1]  Bat Batjargal,et al.  Social Capital and Entrepreneurial Performance in Russia: A Longitudinal Study , 2003 .

[2]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  “Class matters”: human and social capital in the entrepreneurial process , 2003 .

[3]  Julie M. Hite.  Patterns of Multidimensionality among Embedded Network Ties: A Typology of Relational Embeddedness in Emerging Entrepreneurial Firms , 2003 .

[4]  P. Rosa,et al.  The entrepreneurial process and economic success in a constrained environment , 2002 .

[5]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Knowledge spillover in corporate financing networks: embeddedness and the firm's debt performance , 2002 .

[6]  Scott Shane,et al.  Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Richard Fletcher,et al.  Embeddedness and the Evolution of Global Networks: An Australian Case Study , 2001 .

[8]  T. MacLean.  Thick as Thieves: A Social Embeddedness Model of Rule Breaking in Organizations , 2001 .

[9]  Julie M. Hite,et al.  The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm , 2001 .

[10]  K. Provan,et al.  Legitimacy Building in the Evolution of Small-Firm Multilateral Networks: A Comparative Study of Success and Demise , 2000 .

[11]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[12]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks , 2000 .

[13]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[14]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[15]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[16]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[17]  The Influence of the Firm Life Cycle on the Evolution of Entrepreneurial Dyadic Network Ties. , 1998 .

[18]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[19]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[20]  Barry Wellman,et al.  It's about time: how, why, and when networks change , 1997 .

[21]  A. Madhok.  COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .

[22]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[23]  J. Aram,et al.  Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China☆ , 1995 .

[24]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[25]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , 1995 .

[26]  Cross-national Similarities in the Personal Networks of Small Business Owners: A Comparison of Two Regions in North America , 1995 .

[27]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[28]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  H. Aldrich,et al.  Does Networking Pay Off? A Panel Study of Entrepreneurs in the Research Triangle , 1994 .

[30]  J. Hennart,et al.  Explaining the swollen middle : Why most transactions are a mix of market and hierarchy , 1993 .

[31]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Embeddedness, Interdependence, and Opportunism in Organizational Supplier-Buyer Networks , 1993 .

[32]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[33]  Robert Blackburn,et al.  Networks and Small Firms: Constructs, Methodological Strategies and Some Findings , 1993 .

[34]  Andrea L. Larson,et al.  A Network Model of Organization Formation , 1993 .

[35]  Kathleen R. Allen,et al.  The Creation Corridor: Environmental Load and Pre-Organization Information-Processing Ability , 1992 .

[36]  J. M. McPherson,et al.  Social Networks and Organizational Dynamics , 1992 .

[37]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations , 1992 .

[38]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[39]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process , 1991 .

[40]  H. Aldrich,et al.  The Go-Between: Brokers' Roles in Entrepreneurial Networks , 1991 .

[41]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley , 1990 .

[42]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Weak Structural Data@@@Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business. , 1990 .

[43]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Research notes and communications management objectives in mergers and acquisitions , 1990 .

[44]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[45]  J. Jarillo.  Entrepreneurship and growth: the strategic use of external resources , 1989 .

[46]  James William Coleman,et al.  Competition and the Structure of Industrial Society: Reply to Braithwaite , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Properties of Emerging Organizations , 1988 .

[48]  Murray B. Low,et al.  Entrepreneurship: Past Research and Future Challenges , 1988 .

[49]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Populations, Natural Selection, and Applied Organizational Science. , 1983 .

[51]  O. Williamson.  Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[52]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.