A comparison of autonomous techniques for multispectral image analysis and classification

Multispectral imaging has given place to important applications related to classification and identification of objects from a scene. Because of multispectral instruments can be used to estimate the reflectance of materials in the scene, these techniques constitute fundamental tools for materials analysis and quality control. During the last years, a variety of algorithms has been developed to work with multispectral data, whose main purpose has been to perform the correct classification of the objects in the scene. The present study introduces a brief review of some classical as well as a novel technique that have been used for such purposes. The use of principal component analysis and K-means clustering techniques as important classification algorithms is here discussed. Moreover, a recent method based on the min-W and max-M lattice auto-associative memories, that was proposed for endmember determination in hyperspectral imagery, is introduced as a classification method. Besides a discussion of their mathematical foundation, we emphasize their main characteristics and the results achieved for two exemplar images conformed by objects similar in appearance, but spectrally different. The classification results state that the first components computed from principal component analysis can be used to highlight areas with different spectral characteristics. In addition, the use of lattice auto-associative memories provides good results for materials classification even in the cases where some spectral similarities appears in their spectral responses.

[1]  Jaakko Astola,et al.  Mathematics of Data/ Image Pattern Recognition, Compression, Coding, and Encryption X, With Applications , 2007 .

[2]  Gerhard X. Ritter,et al.  Reconstruction of Patterns from Noisy Inputs Using Morphological Associative Memories , 2003, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[3]  Roger L. Easton,et al.  Multispectral imaging of the Archimedes palimpsest , 2003, 32nd Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2003. Proceedings..

[4]  William L. Smith,et al.  Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of the Land and Atmosphere , 2001 .

[5]  Manuel Graña,et al.  Two lattice computing approaches for the unsupervised segmentation of hyperspectral images , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[6]  Manuel Graña,et al.  A brief review of lattice computing , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence).

[7]  Rafael C. González,et al.  Digital image processing, 3rd Edition , 2008 .

[8]  Michael R. Descour,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry V , 1999 .

[9]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[10]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[11]  Juan-Carlos Valdiviezo-Navarro,et al.  Hyperspectral endmember detection based on strong lattice independence , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  F. Hahn Multi-spectral prediction of unripe tomatoes , 2002 .

[13]  Robert Sablatnig,et al.  Multispectral imaging for analyzing ancient manuscripts , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.

[14]  Danh V. Nguyen,et al.  On partial least squares dimension reduction for microarray-based classification: a simulation study , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[15]  Gonzalo Urcid,et al.  Convex Set Approaches for Material Quantification in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2012 .

[16]  R. Cuninghame-Green,et al.  Applied Linear Algebra , 1979 .

[17]  W. R. Windham,et al.  Contaminant classification of poultry hyperspectral imagery using a spectral angle mapper algorithm , 2007 .

[18]  Gerhard X. Ritter,et al.  Lattice Algebra Approach to Color Image Segmentation , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[19]  Moon S. Kim,et al.  Automated detection of fecal contamination of apples based on multispectral fluorescence image fusion , 2005 .

[20]  Franco Lotti,et al.  Image spectroscopy mapping technique for noninvasive analysis of paintings , 1999 .

[21]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Generalized Assorted Pixel Camera: Postcapture Control of Resolution, Dynamic Range, and Spectrum , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Parameter estimation and tissue segmentation from multispectral MR images , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  Paul D. Gader,et al.  Fixed Points of Lattice Transforms and Lattice Associative Memories , 2006 .

[24]  Gerhard X. Ritter,et al.  Chapter 4 – Lattice Algebra Approach to Endmember Determination in Hyperspectral Imagery , 2010 .

[25]  Gerhard X. Ritter,et al.  Autonomous single-pass endmember approximation using lattice auto-associative memories , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[26]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Nirmal Keshava,et al.  A Survey of Spectral Unmixing Algorithms , 2003 .

[28]  Gonzalo Urcid-S.,et al.  Generation of lattice independent vector sets for pattern recognition applications , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[29]  Toshio Uchiyama,et al.  Color image reproduction based on multispectral and multiprimary imaging: experimental evaluation , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[30]  F C Billingsley,et al.  Applications of digital image processing. , 1970, Applied optics.

[31]  Joseph W. Boardman,et al.  Analysis, understanding, and visualization of hyperspectral data as convex sets in n space , 1995, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[32]  Peter Sussner,et al.  Morphological associative memories , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[33]  Ioanna Kakoulli,et al.  Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging technologies in conservation: current research and potential applications , 2006 .