Trajectory tracking control of hypersonic vehicle considering modeling uncertainty

The tightly coupled, highly nonlinear, and notoriously uncertain nature of hypersonic vehicle dynamics brings a great challenge to the control system design. In this paper, an integrated controller based on Differential flatness theory and L1 adaptive theory is designed, and a nonlinear disturbance observer is added to solve the problem of model uncertainty. Differential flatness is applied to the outer loop to linearize the nonlinear model, and L1 adaptive control is applied to the inner loop to stabilize the attitude. The combination realizes the complementarity of their shortcomings. It can not only retain the advantages of L1 adaptive controller, but also avoid wide range of state changes and makes it easy to design parameters satisfying global convergence. The computational order of differential flatness is also reduced and the design of nonlinear disturbance observer becomes feasible. Simulation results for the hypersonic vehicle are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed control scheme.

[1]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Adaptive sliding mode tracking control for a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle , 2012, J. Frankl. Inst..

[2]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Robust Nonlinear Control of a Hypersonic Aircraft , 1999 .

[3]  Lockheed Martin,et al.  Robust Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for a Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle , 2007 .

[4]  Georgia Deaconu,et al.  Collision avoidance in low thrust rendezvous guidance using flatness and positive B-splines , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[5]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Design of an L 1 Adaptive Controller for Air-breathing Hypersonic Vehicle Model in the Presence of Unmodeled Dynamics ⁄ , 2007 .

[6]  Andrea Serrani,et al.  Reference Command Tracking for a Linearized Model of an Air-breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2005 .

[7]  Wang Songyan,et al.  Trajectory tracking control based on differential flatness , 2016, 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC).

[8]  Baris Fidan,et al.  Longitudinal Motion Control of Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicles Based on Time-Varying Models ⁄ , 2006 .

[9]  David B. Doman,et al.  Robust Linear Output Feedback Control of an Airbreathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2008 .

[10]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Novel L1 Adaptive Controller, Part I: Control Signal and Asymptotic Stability , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[11]  Youmin Zhang,et al.  Flatness-Based Trajectory Planning/Replanning for a Quadrotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Arthur Richards,et al.  Engineless unmanned aerial vehicle propulsion by dynamic soaring , 2009 .

[13]  P. D. Shendge,et al.  Sliding Mode Control for Mismatched Uncertain Systems Using an Extended Disturbance Observer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[14]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Adaptive Mode Suppression Scheme for an Aeroelastic Airbreathing Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle , 2008 .

[15]  M. Fliess,et al.  Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: introductory theory and examples , 1995 .

[16]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Adaptive Sliding Mode Control Design fo ra Hypersonic Flight Vehicle , 2004 .