Learner control modes and incentive variations in computer-delivered instruction

This study investigated the effects of two general approaches to the provision of learner control and of two types of incentive on achievement, use of options, time, and attitude using computer-delivered instruction. Posttest scores for the “FullMinus” treatment for learner control, where learners could selectively bypass elements of a full instructional program, were marginally higher than those for the “LeanPlus” treatment, where learners could opt to add elements to a core program (p=.052). The FullMinus treatment resulted in more positive attitudes while requiring no more time. Performance-contingent incentive groups had higher post-test scores than task-contingent groups (p<.05), with no greater investment of learner time and no negative effect on attitude. The findings relate directly to the design of instructional computer programs as well as to the design of future studies on learner control.

[1]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic reinforcement contingencies on learner performance. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[2]  G. Glass,et al.  Statistical methods in education and psychology , 1970 .

[3]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Effects of Systematic Variations in Reinforcement Contingencies on Learner Performance , 1971 .

[4]  J. Campanizzi.  The effects of locus of control and provision of overviews upon response latency and achievement in a computer-assisted instructional sequence / , 1978 .

[5]  R. Tennyson.  Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction. , 1980 .

[6]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[7]  Robert D. Tennyson,et al.  Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction , 1980 .

[8]  Carol A. Carrier.  Selection of Options by Field Independent and Dependent Children in a Computer-Based Concept Lesson. , 1984 .

[9]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  Do Learners Make Good Choices , 1984 .

[10]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  The selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson , 1985 .

[11]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  Instructional Options and Encouragement Effects in a Microcomputer-Delivered Concept Lesson , 1986 .

[12]  J. Stevens.  Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences , 1986 .

[13]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[14]  Carol A. Carrier,et al.  A Test of One Learner-Control Strategy With Students of Differing Levels of Task Persistence , 1988 .

[15]  Patrick J. Schloss,et al.  Learner Control over Feedback as a Variable in Computer Assisted Instruction , 1988 .

[16]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[17]  Cecilia L. Lopez,et al.  The relationship between learner control of CAI and locus of control among hispanic students , 1989 .

[18]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI , 1989 .

[19]  Gary R. Morrison,et al.  Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction , 1989 .

[20]  H. Sullivan,et al.  Practice Mode and Learner Control in Computer-Based Instruction , 1990 .