Nadir and off‐nadir hyperspectral field data: strengths and limitations in estimating grassland biophysical characteristics

In recent years, hyperspectral and multi‐angular approaches for quantifying biophysical characteristics of vegetation have become more widely used. In fact, as both hyperspectral and multi‐angle reflectance decrease the level of noise on retrieved geophysical parameter values, they increase their reliability by also reducing the saturation problem of the relationships between vegetation indices and biophysical characteristics. To test which is the best methodology in estimating some important biophysical grassland parameters (biomass, total and percent biomass nitrogen content, phytomass and its total and percent nitrogen content), nadir and off‐nadir measurements were carried out, three times during the vegetative period of 2004, in a permanent flat meadow located in the experimental farm of the University of Padua, Italy. The two approaches and the broad band vegetation indices calculated using Landsat bands were compared considering both the best determination coefficients of five vegetation indices, calculated with the two analysis, and through a partial least squares regression using different spectral regions measured at different angles as predictive variables. Using nadir data the red edge region was the most useful for the prediction of biophysical variables, especially phytomass, but also nitrogen content. The off‐nadir data did not provide any significance differences in results to that of data obtained in nadir view but both methods seem to be better adapted to describe biophysical parameters of vegetation than the use of broad band vegetation indices.

[1]  U. Beisl,et al.  CORRECTION OF ATMOSPHERIC AND BIDIRECTIONAL EFFECTS IN MULTISPECTRAL ADS40 IMAGES FOR MAPPING PURPOSES , 2004 .

[2]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[3]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation , 2004 .

[4]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS- MODIS , 1996 .

[5]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) instrument description and experiment overview , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[6]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[7]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Comparing regression methods in estimation of biophysical properties of forest stands from two different inventories using laser scanner data , 2005 .

[8]  P. M. Hansena,et al.  Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression , 2003 .

[9]  J. Huntington,et al.  A MULTI-TEMPORAL & MULTI-ANGULAR STUDY OF HYPERSPECTRAL DATA RELATED TO THE BIOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF COTTON CROPS & SOIL CHARACTERISTICS, NSW, AUSTRALIA. , 2004 .

[10]  D. Tanré,et al.  Strategy for direct and indirect methods for correcting the aerosol effect on remote sensing: From AVHRR to EOS-MODIS , 1996 .

[11]  Marie-Louise Smith,et al.  Analysis of hyperspectral data for estimation of temperate forest canopy nitrogen concentration: comparison between an airborne (AVIRIS) and a spaceborne (Hyperion) sensor , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  A. Gitelson,et al.  Detection of Red Edge Position and Chlorophyll Content by Reflectance Measurements Near 700 nm , 1996 .

[13]  R. Lacaze,et al.  Multi-angular optical remote sensing for assessing vegetation structure and carbon absorption , 2003 .

[14]  Anatoly A. Gitelson,et al.  NON-DESTRUCTIVE AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATION OF VEGETATION STATUS , 2001 .

[15]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Physical Mechanisms in Hyperspectral BRDF Data of Grass and Watercress , 1998 .

[16]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Estimation of forest leaf area index using vegetation indices derived from Hyperion hyperspectral data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[18]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Uniqueness of multiangular measurements. I. An indicator of subpixel surface heterogeneity from MISR , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A Directional Multispectral Forest Reflectance Model , 2000 .

[20]  J. Muller,et al.  New directions in earth observing: Scientific applications of multiangle remote sensing , 1999 .

[21]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Discriminating tropical grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) canopies grown under different nitrogen treatments using spectroradiometry , 2003 .

[22]  D. Lamb,et al.  Estimating leaf nitrogen concentration in ryegrass ( Lolium spp.) pasture using the chlorophyll red-edge: Theoretical modelling and experimental observations , 2002 .

[23]  L. S. Galvão,et al.  Effects of Band Positioning and Bandwidth on NDVI Measurements of Tropical Savannas , 1999 .

[24]  J. Chen Evaluation of Vegetation Indices and a Modified Simple Ratio for Boreal Applications , 1996 .

[25]  J. Roujean,et al.  Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements , 1995 .

[26]  S. Ollinger,et al.  DIRECT ESTIMATION OF ABOVEGROUND FOREST PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING OF CANOPY NITROGEN , 2002 .

[27]  G. A. Blackburn,et al.  Quantifying Chlorophylls and Caroteniods at Leaf and Canopy Scales: An Evaluation of Some Hyperspectral Approaches , 1998 .

[28]  A. Strahler,et al.  Multiangle remote sensing: Past, present and future , 2000 .

[29]  D. Kimes Dynamics of directional reflectance factor distributions for vegetation canopies. , 1983, Applied optics.

[30]  David L.B. Jupp,et al.  Variance in bidirectional reflectance over discontinuous plant canopies , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[31]  Yoshifumi Yasuoka,et al.  SPATIAL ESTIMATION OF BIOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF LEAVES WITH HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGER , 2001 .

[32]  R. Casa,et al.  The use of the VIFIS (variable interference filter imaging spectrometer) to obtain information on vegetation properties using multiangular data , 2000 .

[33]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion , 1989 .

[34]  S. Ustin,et al.  LEAF OPTICAL PROPERTIES: A STATE OF THE ART , 2000 .

[35]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Assessing the information content of multiangle satellite data for mapping biomes: I. Statistical analysis , 2002 .

[36]  F. Gemmell,et al.  View Zenith Angle Effects on the Forest Information Content of Three Spectral Indices , 2000 .

[37]  S. Sandmeier,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and quality assessment of laboratory BRDF data , 1998 .

[38]  D. Diner,et al.  Uniqueness of Multiangular Measurements—Part I: An Indicator of Subpixel Surface , 2002 .

[39]  David L.B. Jupp,et al.  Variance in bidirectional reflectance over discontinuous plant canopies , 1998, IGARSS '98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. (Cat. No.98CH36174).

[40]  B. Pinty,et al.  GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites , 1992, Vegetatio.

[41]  P. Thenkabail,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics , 2000 .