A blinking periorbital prosthesis using surface electromyographic signals of the orbicularis oculi muscle

BackgroundRecent advances in human–machine interface technology have enabled the development of multifunctional, primarily orthopedic myoelectric prostheses. We developed a noninvasive blinking periorbital prosthesis that can synchronize with blinking of the intact eyelid by using surface electromyographic signals of the orbicularis oculi muscle.MethodsMyoelectric potentials of the orbicularis oculi muscle while blinking were measured with surface electrodes on the eyelid in four healthy adults. Possible cross talk introduced via the electrodes was also measured and assessed to determine whether cross talk would affect surface electromyographic measurements while blinking.ResultsThe amplitude of the surface myoelectric potential of the orbicularis oculi muscle was sufficiently high for the practical use of blinking prostheses. Our blinking model was successfully synchronized with blinks of the subjects’ eyelids under experimental conditions without cross talk between the orbicularis oculi muscle and other muscles.ConclusionsAlthough our study revealed several problems, the use of surface electromyographic signals could be a promising and useful technique for synchronizing blinking of the prosthetic eyelid with blinking of the intact eyelid.Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

[1]  T W Williams,et al.  Practical methods for controlling powered upper-extremity prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[2]  J. N. Bleicher,et al.  Electrophysiological Study of the Denervated Orbicularis Oculi Muscle in Dogs , 1989, Annals of plastic surgery.

[3]  R. Scott,et al.  Myoelectric control of prostheses. , 1986, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[4]  C. Evinger,et al.  Eyelid movements. Mechanisms and normal data. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Toshiki Yoshimine,et al.  Neural decoding using gyral and intrasulcal electrocorticograms , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Karen A. Manning,et al.  Mechanisms and Normal Data , 1991 .

[7]  Levi J Hargrove,et al.  A real-time comparison between direct control, sequential pattern recognition control and simultaneous pattern recognition control using a Fitts’ law style assessment procedure , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Arun Jayaraman,et al.  A Simple ERP Method for Quantitative Analysis of Cognitive Workload in Myoelectric Prosthesis Control and Human-Machine Interaction , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  C. Aydın,et al.  Complex Craniofacial Reconstruction With Prostheses as an Alternative Method to Autogenous Reconstruction , 2011, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[11]  T. Simpson,et al.  The Effects of Mild Ocular Surface Stimulation and Concentration on Spontaneous Blink Parameters , 2014, Current eye research.

[12]  P. Dario,et al.  Control of multifunctional prosthetic hands by processing the electromyographic signal. , 2002, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[13]  I. Jackson,et al.  A system of osseointegrated implants and its application to dental and facial rehabilitation , 1988, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[14]  M Ueda,et al.  New orbital prosthesis with a blinking eyelid: report of a case. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  D Graupe,et al.  Multifunctional prosthesis and orthosis control via microcomputer identification of temporal pattern differences in single-site myoelectric signals. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[16]  H. Yokoi,et al.  Electrocorticographic control of a prosthetic arm in paralyzed patients , 2012, Annals of neurology.

[17]  P. Tanner,et al.  External auricular and facial prosthetics: a collaborative effort of the reconstructive surgeon and anaplastologist. , 2006, Facial plastic surgery clinics of North America.