A Context-based Approach to Robot-human Interaction☆

Abstract CARIL (Context-Augmented Robotic Interaction Layer) is a human-robot interaction system that leverages cognitive representations of shared context as a basis for a fundamentally new approach to human-robotic interaction. CARIL gives a robot a human-like representation of context and an ability to reason about context in order to adapt its behavior to that of the humans around it. This capability is “action compliance.” A prototype CARIL implementation focuses on a fundamental form of action compliance called non-interference -- “not being underfoot or in a human's way”. Non-interference is key for the safety of human-co-workers, and is also foundational to more complex interactive and teamwork skills. CARIL is tested via simulation in a space-exploration use-case. The live CARIL prototype directs a single simulated robot in a simulated space station where four simulated astronauts are engaging in a variety of tightly-scheduled work activities. The robot is scheduled to perform background tasks away from the astronauts, but must quickly adapt and not be underfoot as astronaut activities diverge from plan and encroach on the robot's space. The robot, driven by CARIL, demonstrates non-interference action compliance in three benchmarks situations, demonstrating the viability of the CARIL technology and concept.

[1]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Autonomy and interdependence in human-agent-robot teams , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Beyond Simon's Slice: Five Fundamental Trade-Offs that Bound the Performance of Macrocognitive Work Systems , 2011, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[3]  Wayne Zachary,et al.  Toward Computational, Embeddable, Cognitive Models of Context , 2015 .

[4]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork: Efficiency, fluency, and perception of team , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[5]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations , 2010 .

[6]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[7]  Alexei Makarenko,et al.  Measuring human-robot team effectiveness to determine an appropriate autonomy level , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Coactive design , 2014, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[9]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Human control for cooperating robot teams , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).