PARAMETRIC ANALYSIS OF ANTARES RE-ENTRY GUIDANCE ALGORITHMS USING ADVANCED TEST GENERATION AND DATA ANALYSIS

Large complex aerospace systems are generally validated in regions local to anticipated operating points rather than through characterization of the entire feasible operational envelope of the system. This is due to the large parameter space, and complex, highly coupled nonlinear nature of the different systems that contribute to the performance of the aerospace system. We have addressed the factors deterring such an analysis by applying a combination of technologies to the area of flight envelop assessment. We utilize n-factor (2,3) combinatorial parameter variations to limit the number of cases, but still explore important interactions in the parameter space in a systematic fashion. The data generated is automatically analyzed through a combination of unsupervised learning using a Bayesian multivariate clustering technique (AutoBayes) and supervised learning of critical parameter ranges using the machine-learning tool TAR3, a treatment learner. Covariance analysis with scatter plots and likelihood contours are used to visualize correlations between simulation parameters and simulation results, a task that requires tool support, especially for large and complex models. We present results of simulation experiments for skip re-entry return scenarios.

[1]  Wray L. Buntine Operations for Learning with Graphical Models , 1994, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[2]  Peter C. Cheeseman,et al.  Bayesian Classification (AutoClass): Theory and Results , 1996, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.

[3]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  MCLUST: Software for Model-Based Clustering, Density Estimation and Discriminant Analysis , 2002 .

[4]  Tim Menzies,et al.  Data Mining for Very Busy People , 2003, Computer.

[5]  J. Czerwonka Pairwise Testing in Real World Practical Extensions to Test Case Generators , 2006 .

[6]  Jeffrey G. Gray,et al.  Automating change evolution in model-driven engineering , 2006, Computer.

[7]  A. Jefferson Offutt,et al.  Combination testing strategies: a survey , 2005, Softw. Test. Verification Reliab..

[8]  Tim Menzies,et al.  Practical large scale what-if queries: case studies with software risk assessment , 2000, Proceedings ASE 2000. Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering.

[9]  C. L. Mallows,et al.  Applying design of experiments to software testing: experience report , 1997, ICSE '97.

[10]  D.M. Cohen,et al.  The Combinatorial Design Approach to Automatic Test Generation , 1996, IEEE Softw..

[11]  Johann Schumann,et al.  Under Consideration for Publication in J. Functional Programming Autobayes: a System for Generating Data Analysis Programs from Statistical Models , 2022 .

[12]  D. Richard Kuhn,et al.  FAILURE MODES IN MEDICAL DEVICE SOFTWARE: AN ANALYSIS OF 15 YEARS OF RECALL DATA , 2001 .

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[14]  Stephen D. Bay,et al.  Detecting change in categorical data: mining contrast sets , 1999, KDD '99.

[15]  Peter Adams,et al.  The EMMIX software for the fitting of mixtures of normal and t-components , 1999 .

[16]  Yu Lei,et al.  A Test Generation Strategy for Pairwise Testing , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..