Invariance in current dipole moment density across brain structures and species: Physiological constraint for neuroimaging

Although anatomical constraints have been shown to be effective for MEG and EEG inverse solutions, there are still no effective physiological constraints. Strength of the current generator is normally described by the moment of an equivalent current dipole Q. This value is quite variable since it depends on size of active tissue. In contrast, the current dipole moment density q, defined as Q per surface area of active cortex, is independent of size of active tissue. Here we studied whether the value of q has a maximum in physiological conditions across brain structures and species. We determined the value due to the primary neuronal current (q primary) alone, correcting for distortions due to measurement conditions and secondary current sources at boundaries separating regions of differing electrical conductivities. The values were in the same range for turtle cerebellum (0.56-1.48 nAm/mm(2)), guinea pig hippocampus (0.30-1.34 nAm/mm(2)), and swine neocortex (0.18-1.63 nAm/mm(2)), rat neocortex (~2.2 nAm/mm(2)), monkey neocortex (~0.40 nAm/mm(2)) and human neocortex (0.16-0.77 nAm/mm(2)). Thus, there appears to be a maximum value across the brain structures and species (1-2 nAm/mm(2)). The empirical values closely matched the theoretical values obtained with our independently validated neural network model (1.6-2.8 nAm/mm(2) for initial spike and 0.7-3.1 nAm/mm(2) for burst), indicating that the apparent invariance is not coincidental. Our model study shows that a single maximum value may exist across a wide range of brain structures and species, varying in neuron density, due to fundamental electrical properties of neurons. The maximum value of q primary may serve as an effective physiological constraint for MEG/EEG inverse solutions.

[1]  Robert Plonsey Generation Of Magnetic Fields By The Human Body (Theory) , 1981 .

[2]  David Ottoson,et al.  Visualization of Brain Functions , 1989 .

[3]  S. Laughlin,et al.  An Energy Budget for Signaling in the Grey Matter of the Brain , 2001, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[4]  A. Evans,et al.  Pitfalls in the dipolar model for the neocortical EEG sources. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[6]  B. Kampa,et al.  Synaptic integration in dendritic trees. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[7]  D. Geselowitz,et al.  Model studies of the magnetocardiogram. , 1973, Biophysical journal.

[8]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Diffusion in brain extracellular space. , 2008, Physiological reviews.

[9]  A. Destexhe,et al.  Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S. N. Erné,et al.  Influence of the Finite Pickup Coil Size on the Localization of Current Sources with Quadrupolar Components , 1989 .

[11]  T. Powell,et al.  A qualitative and quantitative electron microscopic study of the neurons in the primate motor and somatic sensory cortices. , 1979, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[13]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Metabolic cost as a unifying principle governing neuronal biophysics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Samuel J. Williamson,et al.  Magnetic Fields of the Cerebral Cortex , 1980 .

[15]  T L Babb,et al.  Childhood generalized and mesial temporal epilepsies demonstrate different amounts and patterns of hippocampal neuron loss and mossy fibre synaptic reorganization. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  T. Kiehl,et al.  Histologically Confirmed Hippocampal Structural Features Revealed by 3T MR Imaging: Potential to Increase Diagnostic Specificity of Mesial Temporal Sclerosis , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  R. Dingledine,et al.  Regional variation of extracellular space in the hippocampus. , 1990, Science.

[18]  大石 誠 Epileptic spikes : Magnetoencephalography versus simultaneous electrocorticography , 2003 .

[19]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Communication in Neuronal Networks , 2003, Science.

[20]  W. Singer,et al.  Excitatory synaptic ensemble properties in the visual cortex of the macaque monkey: A current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  Y. Okada,et al.  Origins of the somatic N20 and high-frequency oscillations evoked by trigeminal stimulation in the piglets , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Multimodal characterization of population responses evoked by applied electric field in vitro: extracellular potential, magnetic evoked field, transmembrane potential, and current-source density analysis , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  Y. Okada,et al.  Physiological bases of the synchronized population spikes and slow wave of the magnetic field generated by a guinea-pig longitudinal CA3 slice preparation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Andrew C. N. Chen,et al.  Whole-head MEG analysis of cortical spatial organization from unilateral stimulation of median nerve in both hands: No complete hemispheric homology , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  S. J. Williamson,et al.  Spatial extent of coherent sensory-evoked cortical activity , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Steven J. Middleton,et al.  Model of very fast (> 75 Hz) network oscillations generated by electrical coupling between the proximal axons of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Neurotechnique Mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000 .

[28]  T. Powell,et al.  An electron microscopic study of the types and proportions of neurons in the cortex of the motor and visual areas of the cat and rat. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Y. Okada,et al.  Detection of magnetic evoked fields associated with synchronous population activities in the transverse CA1 slice of the guinea pig. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  Y. Okada,et al.  Contributions of principal neocortical neurons to magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography signals , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Improved Localization of Cortical Activity By Combining EEG and MEG with MRI Cortical Surface Reconstruction , 2002 .

[32]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Origin of the apparent tissue conductivity in the molecular and granular layers of the in vitro turtle cerebellum and the interpretation of current source-density analysis. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  M. Carpenter The cerebral cortex , 1976 .

[34]  Y. Okada,et al.  Contribution of Ionic Currents to Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) Signals Generated by Guinea‐Pig CA3 Slices , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  Rob R. de Ruyter van Steveninck,et al.  The metabolic cost of neural information , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  I. Hashimoto,et al.  Impulse Propagation along Thalamocortical Fibers Can Be Detected Magnetically outside the Human Brain , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Clifford Qualls,et al.  Somatosensory responses in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease , 2010, Journal of neural transmission.

[38]  Samuel J. Williamson,et al.  Advances in Biomagnetism , 1990, Springer US.

[39]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Magnetic evoked field associated with transcortical currents in turtle cerebellum. , 1988, Biophysical journal.

[40]  G. Stuart,et al.  Direct measurement of specific membrane capacitance in neurons. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[41]  Rolf-Detlef Treede,et al.  Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Fiona E. N. LeBeau,et al.  Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[44]  V. Mountcastle The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Y. Okada,et al.  Physiological origins of evoked magnetic fields and extracellular field potentials produced by guinea‐pig CA3 hippocampal slices , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[46]  R. Traub,et al.  Neuronal Networks of the Hippocampus , 1991 .

[47]  C. Koch,et al.  Synaptic background activity influences spatiotemporal integration in single pyramidal cells. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  R. Traub,et al.  Neuronal networks of the hippocampus: The single-cell model , 1991 .

[49]  R. Plonsey Capability and limitations of electrocardiography and magnetocardiography. , 1972, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[50]  N. Logothetis,et al.  In Vivo Measurement of Cortical Impedance Spectrum in Monkeys: Implications for Signal Propagation , 2007, Neuron.

[51]  M. Häusser,et al.  Compartmental models of rat cerebellar Purkinje cells based on simultaneous somatic and dendritic patch‐clamp recordings , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  D. Geselowitz On the magnetic field generated outside an inhomogeneous volume conductor by internal current sources , 1970 .

[53]  Biswa Sengupta,et al.  The effect of cell size and channel density on neuronal information encoding and energy efficiency , 2013, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[54]  Matthew T. Sutherland,et al.  Reliable detection of bilateral activation in human primary somatosensory cortex by unilateral median nerve stimulation , 2006, NeuroImage.

[55]  Y. Okada,et al.  Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  V. Mountcastle Perceptual Neuroscience: The Cerebral Cortex , 1998 .

[57]  R. Llinás,et al.  Magnetoencephalography (MEG) as a New Tool for Non-invasive Real-time Analysis of Normal and Abnormal Brain Activity in Humans , 1989 .

[58]  R. Kawashima,et al.  An evaluation of the conductivity profile in the somatosensory barrel cortex of Wistar rats. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  D B Geselowitz Electric and magnetic field of the heart. , 1973, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[60]  R. Traub,et al.  A branching dendritic model of a rodent CA3 pyramidal neurone. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[61]  T. Bliss,et al.  The Hippocampus Book , 2006 .