Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy

[1]  S. Stryker.  Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research , 1968 .

[2]  Ronald E. Ostman,et al.  Impact of Education, Age, Newspapers, and Television on Environmental Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors , 1987 .

[3]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[4]  P. Sparks,et al.  SELF-IDENTITY AND THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR - ASSESSING THE ROLE OF IDENTIFICATION WITH GREEN CONSUMERISM , 1992 .

[5]  Fern K. Willits,et al.  Environmental Attitudes and Behavior , 1994 .

[6]  M. Hogg,et al.  A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory , 1995 .

[7]  H. Hansmann,et al.  The Ownership of Enterprise , 1996 .

[8]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[9]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[10]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Self‐categorisation, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity , 1999 .

[11]  R. Spear.  The Co-operative Advantage , 2000 .

[12]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support , 2000 .

[13]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Identity and Cooperative Behavior in Groups , 2001 .

[14]  Lennart Söder,et al.  An overview of wind energy-status 2002 , 2002 .

[15]  Stefan Stürmer,et al.  Active citizenship: The role of community identification in community volunteerism and local participation , 2003 .

[16]  D. Bell,et al.  The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions: Explanations and Policy Responses , 2005 .

[17]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[18]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  ‘Green On Green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland , 2005 .

[19]  Brent Simpson.  Social Identity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2006 .

[20]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Invalid theory impedes our understanding: A critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY , 2006 .

[21]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[22]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Harnessing Community Energies: Explaining and Evaluating Community-Based Localism in Renewable Energy Policy in the UK , 2007, Global Environmental Politics.

[23]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[24]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review , 2007 .

[25]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[26]  D. Horst.  NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[27]  Jennifer Rogers,et al.  Public perceptions of opportunities for community-based renewable energy projects , 2008 .

[28]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Community renewable energy: What should it mean , 2008 .

[29]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Energy sustainable communities : Environmental psychological investigations , 2008 .

[30]  Petra Schweizer-Ries,et al.  Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany , 2008 .

[31]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism , 2008 .

[32]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place‐protective action , 2009 .

[33]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Pathways to commercial wind power in the US, Europe and Japan: The role of demonstration projects and field trials in the innovation process , 2009 .

[34]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study , 2009 .

[35]  M. Garrido,et al.  Ambivalence and conservation behaviour: An exploratory study on the recycling of metal cans , 2009 .

[36]  J. Hilbe.  Logistic Regression Models , 2009 .

[37]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[38]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Landscape externalities from onshore wind power , 2010 .

[39]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[40]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours , 2010 .

[41]  John Mumford,et al.  Consumer engagement in alternative energy—Can the regulators and suppliers be trusted? , 2010 .

[42]  Charles R. Warren,et al.  Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland , 2010 .

[43]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[44]  Gordon Walker,et al.  The role for ‘community’ in carbon governance , 2011 .

[45]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Helping "light green" consumers walk the talk: Results of a behavioural intervention survey in the Swiss electricity market , 2011 .

[46]  Gillian Irene Bristow,et al.  Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development , 2011 .

[47]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Public engagement with large‐scale renewable energy technologies: breaking the cycle of NIMBYism , 2011 .

[48]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[49]  Heather Barnes Truelove,et al.  Energy source perceptions and policy support: Image associations, emotional evaluations, and cognitive beliefs , 2012 .

[50]  Peta Ashworth,et al.  Societal acceptance of wind farms: Analysis of four common themes across Australian case studies , 2013 .

[51]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion , 2013 .

[52]  Adrian Smith,et al.  A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK , 2013 .

[53]  Yves Pepermans,et al.  Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective , 2013 .

[54]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Public beliefs about high-voltage powerlines in Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom: A comparative survey , 2014 .

[55]  Götz Walter,et al.  Determining the local acceptance of wind energy projects in Switzerland: The importance of general attitudes and project characteristics , 2014 .

[56]  Tasneem Abbasi,et al.  Wind energy: Increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns , 2014 .

[57]  Claire Haggett.  ‘Planning and persuasion’: Public engagement in renewable energy decision-making , 2014 .

[58]  Michael Siegrist,et al.  Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies , 2014 .

[59]  S. Gibbons.  Gone with the wind: Valuing the visual impacts of wind turbines through house prices , 2015 .

[60]  Propriété coopérative et acceptabilité sociale de l’éolien terrestre , 2015 .

[61]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory , 2015, Public understanding of science.

[62]  C. Rootes,et al.  The impact of local campaigns against wind energy developments , 2015 .

[63]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Partnership or placation? The role of trust and justice in the shared ownership of renewable energy projects , 2016 .

[64]  A. Buzogány,et al.  Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics , 2016 .

[65]  Thomas Bauwens.  Explaining the Diversity of Motivations Behind Community Renewable Energy , 2016 .

[66]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives , 2016 .

[67]  D. Bidwell.  The Effects of Information on Public Attitudes Toward Renewable Energy , 2016 .

[68]  Lars Holstenkamp,et al.  What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case , 2016 .

[69]  Mark Diesendorf,et al.  Who owns an energy transition? Strategic action fields and community wind energy in Denmark , 2017 .

[70]  Thomas Bauwens,et al.  Exploring the Links between Community-Based Governance and Sustainable Energy Use: Quantitative Evidence from Flanders , 2017 .

[71]  Nicolas Rossignol,et al.  Siting controversies analysis: framework and method for questioning the procedure , 2017 .

[72]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Co-production in distributed generation: renewable energy and creating space for fitting infrastructure within landscapes , 2018 .