PLATT: A flexible platform for experimental research on team performance in complex environments

The present article introduces PLATT, a recently developed task environment for controlled experimental research on team performance in complex environments. PLATT was developed to meet the research demands posed by the complexity that present-day teams face. It consists of a flexible, modular software architecture and research-specific scenarios. The scenarios can target various types of tasks (e.g., planning, problem solving, and decision making) in different operational contexts. Different software configurations can be used to investigate questions pertaining to team structure, team virtuality, and multiteam systems. We describe the software architecture, one of the scenarios, and the broad range of automated and embedded measurement possibilities that PLATT offers. To illustrate PLATT’s possibilities, in the present article, we describe a number of experiments that have used PLATT for a variety of research questions. We conclude that PLATT meets the formulated research demands and provides researchers with a flexible platform to investigate the complex issues that present-day teams face.

[1]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .

[2]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[3]  David L. Kleinman,et al.  A Research Paradigm for Multi-Human Decision Making , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[4]  Deborah L. Gladstein,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Threat: The Tycoon Game , 1985 .

[5]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[6]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[7]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[8]  Roger J. Volkema,et al.  Problem complexity and the formulation process in planning and design , 1988 .

[9]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Capacity and Capability , 1990 .

[10]  Debra A. Major,et al.  Team Interactive Decision Exercise for Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise (TIDE2): A Program and Paradigm for Team Research. (Version 1.0) , 1991 .

[11]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[12]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[13]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[14]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[15]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[16]  D. Wegner.  A Computer Network Model of Human Transactive Memory , 1995 .

[17]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Networked simulations: New paradigms for team performance research , 1995 .

[19]  Florian Jentsch,et al.  Team-Track: A tool for investigating tracking performance in teams , 1996 .

[20]  Stephanie C Payne,et al.  Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments. , 1998 .

[21]  A. Hollingshead.  Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems , 1998 .

[22]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Effects of Group Goals and Time Pressure on Group Efficacy, Information-Seeking Strategy, and Performance , 2000 .

[24]  Charles E. Miller,et al.  Communication Networks in Task-Performing Groups , 2000 .

[25]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[26]  Endsley,et al.  A model of inter- and intrateam situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement , 2001 .

[27]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Argus: A suite of tools for research in complex cognition , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[28]  P. Rasker.  Communication and performance in teams , 2002 .

[29]  Rego Granlund,et al.  Monitoring distributed teamwork training , 2002 .

[30]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Advances in Measuring Team Cognition , 2003 .

[31]  Richard E. Hayes,et al.  Power to the Edge: Command, Control in the Information Age , 2003 .

[32]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Effects of Perceived Skill Dissimilarity and Task Interdependence on Helping in Work Teams , 2005 .

[33]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Teamwork in multiteam systems. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Dimensions and Antecedents of Team Virtuality , 2005 .

[35]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis.  System Breakdown: The Role of Mental Models and Transactive Memory in the Relationship between Acute Stress and Team Performance , 2006 .

[36]  Mary Ruddy,et al.  ELICIT --The Experimental Laboratory for Investigating Collaboration, Information-sharing and Trust , 2007 .

[37]  The Planning Task for Teams (PLATT): An environment for research on planning and decision making in teams , 2007 .

[38]  A. Gaillard,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects on planning and decision making in teams , 2008 .

[39]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[40]  J. Schraagen,et al.  Information Sharing During Crisis Management in Hierarchical vs. Network Teams , 2010 .

[41]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.