Hierarchical structure and memory retrieval mechanisms in agreement attraction
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Klaus Oberauer,et al. Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition , 2009, Memory & cognition.
[2] J. V. Van Dyke. Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] Thomas G. Bever,et al. Interclause relations and clausal processing , 1978 .
[4] Fernanda Ferreira,et al. The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.
[5] B. McElree,et al. Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.
[6] K. Bock,et al. The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech , 1999 .
[7] Brian McElree,et al. Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.
[8] Albert T. Corbett,et al. Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .
[9] Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al. Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction , 2001 .
[10] Brian McElree,et al. Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .
[11] A. Staub. On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.
[12] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy , 2002 .
[13] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. Towards a Computational Model of Actor-Based Language Comprehension , 2013, Neuroinformatics.
[14] Walter S. Stolz,et al. A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences , 1967 .
[15] Adrian Staub,et al. Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.
[16] S. Ooki. An overview of human handedness in twins , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[17] W. Badecker,et al. The Grammars of Conjunction Agreement in Slovenian , 2015 .
[18] Luigi Rizzi,et al. Object interference in subject–verb agreement: The role of intermediate traces of movement , 2010 .
[19] Richard L. Lewis. Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[20] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production , 2001 .
[21] M. Gernsbacher,et al. Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.
[22] C. Phillips,et al. Relation-sensitive retrieval: Evidence from bound variable pronouns , 2015 .
[23] Yvonne Koch. The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation , 2016 .
[24] W. Tabor,et al. Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement , 2018, Front. Psychol..
[25] B. Dosher,et al. Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .
[26] Michael Shvartsman,et al. The cue-based retrieval theory of sentence comprehension: New findings and new challenges , 2017 .
[27] Tanya Reinhart,et al. The syntactic domain of anaphora , 1976 .
[28] Noam Chomsky,et al. Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .
[29] P. Gordon,et al. Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[30] Maria Babyonyshev,et al. The Complexity of Nested Structures in Japanese. , 1999 .
[31] J. S. Nairne. The myth of the encoding-retrieval match , 2002, Memory.
[32] N. Cowan. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[33] Brian McElree,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics: Working memory and language processing: Theory, data, and directions for future research , 2013 .
[34] L. Cosmides,et al. Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[35] Eric S Solomon,et al. Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[36] S. Gronlund,et al. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[37] Holly P. Branigan,et al. The effects of word order on subject–verb and object–verb agreement: Evidence from Basque , 2013 .
[38] Brian McElree,et al. Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .
[39] Slioussar Natalia,et al. Attraction errors in gender agreement: Evidence from Russian , 2013 .
[40] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. Studies in the perception of language , 1982 .
[41] Edward Gibson,et al. The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .
[42] B McElree,et al. Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[43] M. Just,et al. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .
[44] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension , 2004 .
[45] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .
[46] Arsalan Kahnemuyipour,et al. Object attraction and the role of structural hierarchy: Evidence from Persian , 2020 .
[47] Laurel Brehm,et al. The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.
[48] Stephani Foraker,et al. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .
[49] Ellen F. Lau,et al. Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .
[50] Kathryn Bock,et al. Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.
[51] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. Plausibility and grammatical agreement , 2003 .
[52] Richard L. Lewis,et al. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..
[53] N. Arnett,et al. Subject encodings and retrieval interference , 2017 .
[54] Mary C. Potter,et al. Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .
[55] Michel Hupet,et al. Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing , 1998 .
[56] Colin Phillips,et al. The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[57] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[58] K. Bock,et al. Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[59] Julie Franck,et al. Syntactic Encoding: Novel Insights Into the Relationship Between Grammar and Processing , 2017 .
[60] D. Aaronson,et al. Performance Theories for Sentence Coding: Some Quantitative Evidence. , 1976 .
[61] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[62] W. Tabor,et al. Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[63] Davin Caplan. Clause boundaries and recognition latencies for words in sentences , 1972 .
[64] Marc W Howard,et al. When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval , 2002 .
[65] Luigi Rizzi,et al. Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction , 2006, Cognition.
[66] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. Sentence processing and the clause boundary , 1978 .
[67] Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al. The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .
[68] Richard L. Lewis,et al. The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.
[69] J. V. Van Dyke. Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.
[70] K. Bock. Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .
[71] A. Leslie. A theory of agency. , 1995 .
[72] Garrett Smith,et al. A Self-Organizing Approach to Subject-Verb Number Agreement. , 2018, Cognitive science.
[73] Lyn Frazier,et al. Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension: 2703 , 1999 .
[74] P. Gordon,et al. Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .
[75] D. Norris,et al. The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.
[76] Ina Bornkessel,et al. The Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation , 2002 .
[77] 郑有志. 谈谈A Grammar of Contemporary English对于分句与句子问题的若干处理 , 1993 .
[78] F. R. Chang. Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference , 1980, Memory & cognition.
[79] B. McElree,et al. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.
[80] N. Cowan,et al. The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.
[81] K. Bock,et al. Some Attractions of Verb Agreement , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.
[82] J Barker,et al. Semantic Factors in the Production of Number Agreement , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[83] M. B. Edwards,et al. Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[84] Kathryn Bock,et al. The role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish , 2012 .
[85] Edward Gibson,et al. Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .
[86] David E. Kieras,et al. New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .
[87] C. N. Cofer. Origins of the journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior , 1978 .
[88] Kathryn Bock,et al. Agreement and attraction in Russian , 2008 .
[89] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[90] B. McElree,et al. Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[91] Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al. Network Strength Theory of Storage and Retrieval Dynamics. , 1976 .
[92] B. McElree,et al. Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .
[93] Shravan Vasishth,et al. Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2017 .
[94] Ellen F. Lau,et al. Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension , 2015 .
[95] N. Slioussar. Forms and features: The role of syncretism in number agreement attraction , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.
[96] William Badecker,et al. Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak , 2007 .
[97] Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al. One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .
[98] B McElree,et al. Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[99] N. Mulligan. Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[100] Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al. The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[101] Neal J Pearlmutter,et al. Against structural constraints in subject-verb agreement production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.