Hierarchical structure and memory retrieval mechanisms in agreement attraction

Speakers occasionally cause the verb to agree with an element that is not the subject, a so-called ‘attractor’; likewise, comprehenders occasionally fail to notice agreement errors when the attractor agrees with the verb. Cross-linguistic studies converge in showing that attraction is modulated by the hierarchical position of the attractor in the sentence structure. We report two experiments exploring the link between structural position and memory representations in attraction. The method used is innovative in two respects: we used jabberwocky materials to control for semantic influences and focus on structural agreement processing, and we used a Speed-Accuracy Trade-off (SAT) design combined with a memory probe recognition task, as classically used in list memorization tasks. SAT allowed us to investigate the full time-course of processing and it enabled the joint measurement of retrieval speed and retrieval accuracy. Experiment 1 first established that attraction arises in jabberwocky sentences, to a similar extent and following the same structure-dependency as in natural sentences. Experiment 2 showed a close alignment between the attraction profiles found in Experiment 1 and memory parameters. Results support a content-addressable architecture of memory representations for sentences in which nouns’ accessibility depends on their syntactic position, while subjects are kept in the focus of attention.

[1]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[2]  J. V. Van Dyke Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Interclause relations and clausal processing , 1978 .

[4]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  B. McElree,et al.  Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[6]  K. Bock,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Creating Number Agreement in Speech , 1999 .

[7]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing short-term memory with semantic and phonological information: A time-course analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[9]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction , 2001 .

[10]  Brian McElree,et al.  Accessing Recent Events , 2006 .

[11]  A. Staub On the interpretation of the number attraction effect: Response time evidence. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy , 2002 .

[13]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Towards a Computational Model of Actor-Based Language Comprehension , 2013, Neuroinformatics.

[14]  Walter S. Stolz,et al.  A study of the ability to decode grammatically novel sentences , 1967 .

[15]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Response time distributional evidence for distinct varieties of number attraction , 2010, Cognition.

[16]  S. Ooki An overview of human handedness in twins , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  W. Badecker,et al.  The Grammars of Conjunction Agreement in Slovenian , 2015 .

[18]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Object interference in subject–verb agreement: The role of intermediate traces of movement , 2010 .

[19]  Richard L. Lewis Interference in short-term memory: The magical number two (or three) in sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex Affects Syntax: Contextual Influences in Sentence Production , 2001 .

[21]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[22]  C. Phillips,et al.  Relation-sensitive retrieval: Evidence from bound variable pronouns , 2015 .

[23]  Yvonne Koch The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation , 2016 .

[24]  W. Tabor,et al.  Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[25]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[26]  Michael Shvartsman,et al.  The cue-based retrieval theory of sentence comprehension: New findings and new challenges , 2017 .

[27]  Tanya Reinhart,et al.  The syntactic domain of anaphora , 1976 .

[28]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Minimalist inquiries : the framework , 1998 .

[29]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Maria Babyonyshev,et al.  The Complexity of Nested Structures in Japanese. , 1999 .

[31]  J. S. Nairne The myth of the encoding-retrieval match , 2002, Memory.

[32]  N. Cowan The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  Brian McElree,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics: Working memory and language processing: Theory, data, and directions for future research , 2013 .

[34]  L. Cosmides,et al.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Eric S Solomon,et al.  Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  The effects of word order on subject–verb and object–verb agreement: Evidence from Basque , 2013 .

[38]  Brian McElree,et al.  Proactive Interference Slows Recognition by Eliminating Fast Assessments of Familiarity. , 2007 .

[39]  Slioussar Natalia,et al.  Attraction errors in gender agreement: Evidence from Russian , 2013 .

[40]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Studies in the perception of language , 1982 .

[41]  Edward Gibson,et al.  The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension : Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources , 2006 .

[42]  B McElree,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Is Mediated by Content-Addressable Memory Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[43]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[44]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  On incremental interpretation: Degrees of meaning accessed during sentence comprehension , 2004 .

[45]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities , 2003 .

[46]  Arsalan Kahnemuyipour,et al.  Object attraction and the role of structural hierarchy: Evidence from Persian , 2020 .

[47]  Laurel Brehm,et al.  The time-course of feature interference in agreement comprehension: Multiple mechanisms and asymmetrical attraction. , 2014, Journal of memory and language.

[48]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension , 2003 .

[49]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement Attraction in Comprehension: Representations and Processes. , 2009 .

[50]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[51]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Plausibility and grammatical agreement , 2003 .

[52]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  N. Arnett,et al.  Subject encodings and retrieval interference , 2017 .

[54]  Mary C. Potter,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation (rsvp): a method for studying language processing , 2018 .

[55]  Michel Hupet,et al.  Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing , 1998 .

[56]  Colin Phillips,et al.  The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[57]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  K. Bock,et al.  Broken agreement , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  Julie Franck,et al.  Syntactic Encoding: Novel Insights Into the Relationship Between Grammar and Processing , 2017 .

[60]  D. Aaronson,et al.  Performance Theories for Sentence Coding: Some Quantitative Evidence. , 1976 .

[61]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[62]  W. Tabor,et al.  Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  Davin Caplan Clause boundaries and recognition latencies for words in sentences , 1972 .

[64]  Marc W Howard,et al.  When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval , 2002 .

[65]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction , 2006, Cognition.

[66]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Sentence processing and the clause boundary , 1978 .

[67]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[68]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  The mind and brain of short-term memory. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  J. V. Van Dyke Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. , 2011, Journal of memory and language.

[70]  K. Bock Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[71]  A. Leslie A theory of agency. , 1995 .

[72]  Garrett Smith,et al.  A Self-Organizing Approach to Subject-Verb Number Agreement. , 2018, Cognitive science.

[73]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Feature manipulation in sentence comprehension: 2703 , 1999 .

[74]  P. Gordon,et al.  Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity , 2004 .

[75]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[76]  Ina Bornkessel,et al.  The Argument Dependency Model: A neurocognitive approach to incremental interpretation , 2002 .

[77]  郑有志 谈谈A Grammar of Contemporary English对于分句与句子问题的若干处理 , 1993 .

[78]  F. R. Chang Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[79]  B. McElree,et al.  Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. , 2006, Journal of memory and language.

[80]  N. Cowan,et al.  The Magical Mystery Four , 2010, Current directions in psychological science.

[81]  K. Bock,et al.  Some Attractions of Verb Agreement , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[82]  J Barker,et al.  Semantic Factors in the Production of Number Agreement , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[83]  M. B. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of the retrieval of item versus spatial position information. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  The role of morphology in subject–verb number agreement: A comparison of Mexican and Dominican Spanish , 2012 .

[85]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Argumenthood and English Prepositional Phrase Attachment , 1999 .

[86]  David E. Kieras,et al.  New methods in reading comprehension research , 1986 .

[87]  C. N. Cofer Origins of the journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior , 1978 .

[88]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Agreement and attraction in Russian , 2008 .

[89]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[90]  B. McElree,et al.  Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[91]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Network Strength Theory of Storage and Retrieval Dynamics. , 1976 .

[92]  B. McElree,et al.  Attended and Non-Attended States in Working Memory: Accessing Categorized Structures , 1998 .

[93]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Similarity-based interference in sentence comprehension: Literature review and Bayesian meta-analysis , 2017 .

[94]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  Agreement attraction in Spanish comprehension , 2015 .

[95]  N. Slioussar Forms and features: The role of syncretism in number agreement attraction , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.

[96]  William Badecker,et al.  Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak , 2007 .

[97]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .

[98]  B McElree,et al.  Working memory and focal attention. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[99]  N. Mulligan Word frequency and memory: Effects on absolute versus relative order memory and on item memory versus order memory , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[100]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  The Role of Prominence Information in the Real-Time Comprehension of Transitive Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Approach , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[101]  Neal J Pearlmutter,et al.  Against structural constraints in subject-verb agreement production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.