Advancing MOOC and SPOC development via a learner decision journey analytic framework

Recently, the rise of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Small Private Online Courses (SPOCs) have reshaped the scope of education. In these online learning environments, learners have control over their learning process and actively "pull" information that are helpful to them. This makes the educational process primarily learner-driven. Learning analytics and pedagogies have been proposed to actively engage learners, to provide suitable learning environment and to empower learners to learn. However, existing frameworks are not holistic and fail to capture all learner contact points within and outside the course. In this manuscript, a Learner Decision Journey framework is proposed for analyzing MOOC/SPOC development and in particular, for understanding the circular learning process in MOOCs, to generate further insights for course improvements. A case study of analyzing post-learning experiences in a MOOC is used to illustrate how the proposed framework can be used in practice. The proposed framework can be generalized to study activities in all stages of the Learning Decision Journey to provide a holistic analysis of MOOC/SPOC development.

[1]  Francisco J. García-Peñalvo,et al.  Methodological Approach and Technological Framework to Break the Current Limitations of MOOC Model , 2015, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  A Review on Massive E-Learning (MOOC) Design, Delivery and Assessment , 2013, 2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing.

[3]  George Siemens,et al.  Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative , 2014 .

[4]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Peer and self assessment in massive online classes , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[5]  Jane Sinclair,et al.  Massive open online courses: a review of usage and evaluation , 2015, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[6]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[7]  Linda Corrin,et al.  Predicting success: how learners' prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance , 2015, LAK.

[8]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  Will massive online open courses (moocs) change education? , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs , 2014, 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[10]  Fred G. Martin,et al.  Will massive open online courses change how we teach? , 2012, CACM.

[11]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks inonline lecture videos , 2014, L@S.

[12]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  Learning analytics as a "middle space" , 2013, LAK '13.

[13]  Jeremy Knox,et al.  From MOOCs to Learning Analytics: Scratching the surface of the 'visual' , 2014, ELERN.

[14]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[15]  Belle Selene Xia Benefit and Cost Analysis of Massive Open Online Courses: Pedagogical Implications on Higher Education , 2015, Int. J. Cyber Behav. Psychol. Learn..

[16]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS , 2016, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Proposal for a Conceptual Framework for Educators to Describe and Design MOOCs , 2014, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Kristy Elizabeth Boyer,et al.  Unsupervised modeling for understanding MOOC discussion forums: a learning analytics approach , 2015, LAK.

[19]  Doug Clow,et al.  MOOCs and the funnel of participation , 2013, LAK '13.

[20]  Armando Fox,et al.  Monitoring MOOCs: which information sources do instructors value? , 2014, L@S.