Applicability of the local inertial approximation of the shallow water equations to flood modeling

Recent studies have demonstrated the improved computational performance of a computer algorithm based on a simplification of the shallow water equations—the so‐called local inertial approximation—which has been observed to provide results comparable to the full set of equations in a range of flood flow problems. This study presents an extended view on the local inertial system, shedding light on those key elements necessary to understand its applicability to flows of practical interest. First, the properties of the simplified system with potential impact on the accuracy of the solutions are described and compared to the corresponding full‐dynamic counterparts. In light of this discussion, the behavior of the solutions is then analyzed through a set of rigorously designed test cases in which analytical solutions to the shallow water system are available. Results show a general good agreement between the local inertial and full‐dynamic models, especially in the lower range of subcritical flows (Fr < 0.5). In terms of steady nonuniform flow water profiles, the error introduced by the local inertial approximation leads to milder water depth gradients, which results in attenuated spatial changes in depth. In unsteady problems, the local inertial approximation leads to slower flood propagation speeds than those predicted by the full‐dynamic equations. Even though our results suggest that the magnitude of these errors is small in a range of floodplain and lowland channels, it becomes increasingly relevant with increasing Fr and depth gradients.

[1]  M. Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves I. Flood movement in long rivers , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  F. Henderson Open channel flow , 1966 .

[3]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady, one‐dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph , 1967 .

[4]  Giampaolo Di Silvio Flood Wave Modification Along Prismatic Channels , 1969 .

[5]  Daryl B. Simons,et al.  Shallow Wave Propagation in Open Channel Flow , 1977 .

[6]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Applicability of kinematic and diffusion models. , 1978 .

[7]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady one‐dimensional flow over a plane: Partial equilibrium and recession hydrographs , 1980 .

[8]  J.H.Daluz Vieira Conditions governing the use of approximations for the Saint-Vénant equations for shallow surface water flow , 1983 .

[9]  M. G. Ferrick,et al.  Modeling rapidly varied flow in tailwaters , 1984 .

[10]  Michael G. Ferrick,et al.  Analysis of River Wave Types , 1985 .

[11]  T. Hromadka,et al.  A diffusion hydrodynamic model (DHM) , 1986 .

[12]  Victor Miguel Ponce Diffusion Wave Modeling of Catchment Dynamics , 1986 .

[13]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  On the diffusion wave model for overland flow: 2. Steady state analysis , 1988 .

[14]  James C. I. Dooge,et al.  Applicability of diffusion analogy in flood routing , 1988 .

[15]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  On the diffusion wave model for overland flow: 1. Solution for steep slopes , 1988 .

[16]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  Approximate Analytical Solutions for Overland Flows , 1990 .

[17]  Randel Haverkamp,et al.  Asymptotic expansion for steady state overland flow , 1990 .

[18]  Paolo Lamberti,et al.  Flood propagation models for real-time forecasting , 1996 .

[19]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Errors of kinematic-wave and diffusion-wave approximations for steady-state overland flows , 1996 .

[20]  Nancy Nichols,et al.  Analytic Benchmark Solutions for Open-Channel Flows , 1997 .

[21]  Bernard Cappelaere,et al.  Accurate Diffusive Wave Routing , 1997 .

[22]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[23]  Giuseppe T. Aronica,et al.  2D Multilevel Model for Flood Wave Propagation in Flood-Affected Areas , 1998 .

[24]  P. D. Batesa,et al.  A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation , 2000 .

[25]  E. Toro Shock-Capturing Methods for Free-Surface Shallow Flows , 2001 .

[26]  R. LeVeque Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems: Characteristics and Riemann Problems for Linear Hyperbolic Equations , 2002 .

[27]  Christina W. Tsai Applicability of Kinematic, Noninertia, and Quasi-Steady Dynamic Wave Models to Unsteady Flow Routing , 2003 .

[28]  Christina W. Tsai,et al.  Shallow Water Wave Propagation in Convectively Accelerating Open-Channel Flow Induced by the Tailwater Effect , 2004 .

[29]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  An adaptive time step solution for raster-based storage cell modelling of floodplain inundation , 2005 .

[30]  I. Villanueva,et al.  Linking Riemann and storage cell models for flood prediction , 2006 .

[31]  Matthew D. Wilson,et al.  Improved simulation of flood flows using storage cell models , 2006 .

[32]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Accuracy of Kinematic Wave Approximation for Flood Routing. II: Unsteady Analysis , 2008 .

[33]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Accuracy of Kinematic Wave and Diffusion Wave Approximations for Flood Routing. I: Steady Analysis , 2008 .

[34]  P. Bates,et al.  Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding , 2008 .

[35]  Impact Of Coefficients In Momentum Equation On Selection Of Inertial Models , 2010 .

[36]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[37]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Improving the stability of a simple formulation of the shallow water equations for 2‐D flood modeling , 2012 .

[38]  A. Philipp,et al.  Analytical Model of Surface Flow on Hillslopes Based on the Zero Inertia Equations , 2012 .

[39]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  How much physical complexity is needed to model flood inundation? , 2012 .

[40]  B. Gouldby,et al.  Hydraulic model evaluation for large‐scale flood risk assessments , 2013 .