Using stroke- or character-based self-organizing maps in the recognition of on-line, connected cursive script

Abstract Comparisons are made between a number of stroke-based and character-based recognizers of connected cursive script. In both approaches a Kohonen self-organizing neural network is used as a feature-vector quantizer. It is found that a “best match only” character-based recognizer performs better than a “best match only” stroke-based recognizer at the cost of a substantial increase in computation. However, allowing up to three multiple stroke interpretations yielded a much larger improvement on the performance of the stroke-based recognizer. Within the character-based architecture, a comparison is made between temporal and spatial resampling of characters. No significant differences between these resampling methods were found. Geometrical normalization (orientation, slant) did not significantly improve the recognition. Training sets of more than 500 cursive words appeared to be necessary to yield acceptable performance.

[1]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  The State of the Art in Online Handwriting Recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  Digital recording and processing of handwriting movements , 1984 .

[3]  Lindsay J. Evett,et al.  Fast dictionary look-up for contextual word recognition , 1990, Pattern Recognit..

[4]  Lambertus Schomaker,et al.  Stroke- versus Character-based Recognition of On-line, Connected Cursive Script , 1991 .

[5]  Hans-Leo Teulings A Handwriting Recognition System Based on Properties of the Human Motor System , 1990 .

[6]  T. Kohonen Adaptive, associative, and self-organizing functions in neural computing. , 1987, Applied optics.

[7]  Isabelle Guyon,et al.  Design of a neural network character recognizer for a touch terminal , 1991, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Ching Y. Suen,et al.  Computer recognition and human production of handwriting , 1989 .

[9]  Lambertus Schomaker,et al.  Towards the implementation of cursive-script understanding in an online handwriting-recognition system , 1988 .

[10]  M. L. Meeks,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF DYNAMIC DIGITIZER PERFORMANCE , 1990 .

[11]  Lambert Schomaker Simulation and recognition of handwriting movements: a vertical approach to modeling human motor behavior , 1991 .

[12]  C Y Suen,et al.  Handwriting generation, perception and recognition. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Réjean Plamondon,et al.  An evaluation of motor models of handwriting , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  LAMBERT R. B. SCHOMAKER,et al.  A computational model of cursive handwriting , 1987 .