The world wide web of research and access to knowledge

This paper examines the shift to online knowledge in research. In recent years there has been a major transformation in how formal and informal science communication is disseminated by electronic means. At the same time, researchers’ practices in accessing knowledge and information have changed, particularly in the use of search engines and digitized resources apart from traditional journals. While we still know little about how this affects the nature of research, particularly in light of disciplinary differences, we reject here the idea that the simple growth of outputs and proliferation of outputs also leads straightforwardly to a richer and more diverse information and knowledge environment. Instead, we argue that gatekeepers such as search engines which shape online visibility, combined with competition for limited attention space at the leading edge of research, leads to a different model of how access to knowledge and information is being shaped.

[1]  De Solla-Price,et al.  Little science, big science ... and beyond , 1986 .

[2]  Arie Rip,et al.  An Exercise in Foresight: The Research System in Transition--To What? , 1990 .

[3]  Alison J. Head,et al.  Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? , 2007, First Monday.

[4]  Daniel Atkins,et al.  Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure , 2003 .

[5]  D. Price Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[6]  W. Dutton,et al.  Top‐Down e‐Infrastructure Meets Bottom‐Up Research Innovation: The Social Shaping of e‐Research , 2009 .

[7]  Pamela Effrein Sandstrom,et al.  Scholarly communication as a socioecological system , 2001, Scientometrics.

[8]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Relying on electronic journals: Reading patterns of astronomers , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  e‐Research Infrastructures and Open Science: Towards a New System of Knowledge Production? 1 , 2007 .

[11]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[12]  Chris Anderson The long tail : how endless choice is creating unlimited demand , 2006 .

[13]  N. Mclaughlin The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change , 2000 .

[14]  S. Schneider,et al.  Web Sphere Analysis : An Approach to Studying Online Action Forthcoming in Virtual Methods : Issues in Social Science Research on the Internet , , 2004 .

[15]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  M. Nentwich Cyberscience: Research in the Age of the Internet , 2003 .

[17]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? , 2007 .

[18]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[19]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2005 .

[20]  P. Ginsparg Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village , 1997 .

[21]  D. Hakken The Knowledge Landscapes of Cyberspace , 2003 .

[22]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[23]  John Houghton,et al.  The Economic Impact of Enhanced Access to Research Findings , 2006 .

[24]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[25]  Francine Berman,et al.  Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality , 2003 .

[26]  KoushaKayvan,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .

[27]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Bibliometrics to webometrics , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Belver C. Griffith,et al.  Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for Psychology , 1972, Inf. Storage Retr..

[29]  Ralph Schroeder e-Sciences as research technologies: reconfiguring disciplines, globalizing knowledge , 2008 .

[30]  C. Borgman Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2007 .

[31]  Barrie Gunter,et al.  The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future , 2008, Aslib Proc..

[32]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Motivations for academic web site interlinking: evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[33]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Software Design for Empowering Scientists , 2009, IEEE Software.

[34]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Information seeking behavior of academic scientists , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Rob Kling,et al.  a Bit More to It: Scholarly Communication Forums as Socio-technical Interaction Networks , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Christine Reid,et al.  The Myth of the Paperless Office , 2003, J. Documentation.

[39]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[40]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[42]  W. D. Garvey,et al.  Scientific communication as a social system. The exchange of information on research evolves predictably and can be experimentally modified. , 1967, Science.

[43]  Shefali Virkar,et al.  Search Engines and Expertise about Global Issues: Well-defined Landscape or Undomesticated Wilderness? , 2008 .

[44]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Patterns of Information Search and Access on the World Wide Web: Democratizing Expertise or Creating New Hierarchies? , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Untangling the web of e-Research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[46]  Uwe Matzat,et al.  Academic communication and Internet Discussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts? , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[47]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Changes or transition? Analysing the use of ICTs in the sciences , 2008 .

[48]  Jukka Liedes,et al.  INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: Who Should Own Scientific Papers? , 1997 .

[49]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  The Data Deluge: An e-Science Perspective , 2003 .

[50]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[51]  R. Jackson,et al.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1988, International journal of dermatology.

[52]  R. Whitley The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[53]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  What Internet Use Does and Does Not Change in Scientific Communities , 2003 .

[54]  P. Ginsparg,et al.  Who Should Own Scientific Papers? , 1998, Science.

[55]  Stevan Harnad,et al.  The self-archiving initiative , 2001, Nature.

[56]  Paul Ginsparg As We May Read , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Jenny Fry,et al.  The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields , 2004, ASIST.

[58]  Francine Berman,et al.  Overview of the Book: Grid Computing – Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality , 2003 .

[59]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[60]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Little science, big science... and beyond , 1994, Scientometrics.

[61]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[62]  Charles Anderson,et al.  The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete , 2008 .

[63]  Julie Hallmark Access and Retrieval of Recent Journal Articles: A Comparative Study of Chemists and Geoscientists , 2004, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[64]  Eric T. Meyer Socio-Technical Interaction Networks: A Discussion of the Strengths, Weaknesses and Future of Kling's STIN Model , 2006, HCC.

[65]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[66]  Ralph Schroeder,et al.  Social Science Approaches to e-Science: Framing an Agenda , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[67]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals , 2008 .