Hold tight or loosen up? Functional consequences of a shift in anther architecture depend substantially on bee body size

[1]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Selection on size variation: more variation in bumble bee workers and in the wild , 2022, Insectes Sociaux.

[2]  A. Russell,et al.  Structural dynamics of real and modelled Solanum stamens: implications for pollen ejection by buzzing bees , 2021, bioRxiv.

[3]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz‐pollinated Solanum flowers , 2021, bioRxiv.

[4]  T. Ashman,et al.  Pollinator effectiveness is affected by intraindividual behavioral variation , 2021, Oecologia.

[5]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Transmission of bee-like vibrations in buzz-pollinated plants with different stamen architectures , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[6]  C. Schlindwein,et al.  Minimum size threshold of visiting bees of a buzz-pollinated plant species: consequences for pollination efficiency. , 2021, American journal of botany.

[7]  T. Ashman,et al.  Diversity and composition of pollen loads carried by pollinators are primarily driven by insect traits, not floral community characteristics , 2021, Oecologia.

[8]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Biomechanical properties of a buzz-pollinated flower , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  K. Lunau,et al.  Morphological specialisation of heterantherous Rhynchanthera grandiflora (Melastomataceae) accommodates pollinator diversity. , 2020, Plant biology.

[10]  Sabine S. Nooten,et al.  Historical changes in bumble bee body size and range shift of declining species , 2020, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[11]  Nathan Muchhala,et al.  Importance of Pollinator-Mediated Interspecific Pollen Transfer for Angiosperm Evolution , 2019, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.

[12]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Habitat enhancements rescue bee body size from the negative effects of landscape simplification , 2019, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[13]  D. Papaj,et al.  Sonicating bees demonstrate flexible pollen extraction without instrumental learning , 2019, Current zoology.

[14]  A. Mason,et al.  Does body size predict the buzz‐pollination frequencies used by bees? , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[15]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Foraging efficiency and size matching in a plant–pollinator community: the importance of sugar content and tongue length , 2019, Ecology letters.

[16]  C. Minnaar,et al.  Plant–pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity , 2018, Annals of botany.

[17]  K. Lunau,et al.  Functional significance of the optical properties of flowers for visual signalling , 2018, Annals of botany.

[18]  M. Vallejo‐Marín.  Buzz pollination: studying bee vibrations on flowers. , 2019, The New phytologist.

[19]  S. Biswas,et al.  Negative relationship between interspecies spatial association and trait dissimilarity , 2018, Oikos.

[20]  Ø. Opedal.  Herkogamy, a Principal Functional Trait of Plant Reproductive Biology , 2018, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[21]  K. Lunau,et al.  The functional role of the keel crest in Polygala myrtifolia (Polygalaceae) and its effects on pollinator visitation success , 2018, South African Journal of Botany.

[22]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  Costs and benefits of alternative food handling tactics help explain facultative exploitation of pollination mutualisms. , 2018, Ecology.

[23]  A. Russell,et al.  The evolution of floral sonication, a pollen foraging behavior used by bees (Anthophila) , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  K. Lunau,et al.  To be on the safe site – Ungroomed spots on the bee’s body and their importance for pollination , 2017, PloS one.

[25]  Š. Janěcek,et al.  The nectar spur is not only a simple specialization for long-proboscid pollinators. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[26]  D. Papaj,et al.  How a generalist bee achieves high efficiency of pollen collection on diverse floral resources , 2017 .

[27]  Franco E. Chiarini,et al.  A revision of the Solanum elaeagnifolium clade (Elaeagnifolium clade; subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae) , 2017, PhytoKeys.

[28]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? An experimental test in a buzz‐pollinated species with anther dimorphism , 2017, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  D. Papaj,et al.  Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants: flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest , 2017, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[30]  D. Papaj,et al.  Patterns of pollen and nectar foraging specialization by bumblebees over multiple timescales using RFID , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Shuang‐Quan Huang,et al.  Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees? , 2017, Oecologia.

[32]  V. Wolters,et al.  Intra-specific body size determines pollination effectiveness , 2016 .

[33]  J. Karubian,et al.  Nectar robbing impacts pollinator behavior but not plant reproduction , 2016 .

[34]  I. Bartomeus,et al.  The Allometry of Bee Proboscis Length and Its Uses in Ecology , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  D. Papaj,et al.  Bees learn preferences for plant species that offer only pollen as a reward , 2016 .

[36]  Shuang‐Quan Huang,et al.  interspecific pollen transfer between two coflowering species was minimized by bumblebee fidelity and differential pollen placement on the bumblebee body , 2015 .

[37]  Yanwen Zhang,et al.  High ratio of illegitimate visitation by small bees severely weakens the potential function of heteranthery , 2015 .

[38]  W. Kress,et al.  Pollinator recognition by a keystone tropical plant , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  J. Thomson,et al.  Pollen packing affects the function of pollen on corbiculate bees but not non-corbiculate bees , 2015, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[40]  J. Ghazoul,et al.  Determinants of the microstructure of plant–pollinator networks , 2014 .

[41]  S. Corbet,et al.  Buzz pollination in eight bumblebee-pollinated Pedicularis species: does it involve vibration-induced triboelectric charging of pollen grains? , 2014, Annals of botany.

[42]  P. Willmer,et al.  Big bees do a better job: intraspecific size variation influences pollination effectiveness. , 2014 .

[43]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Strong Reinforcing Selection in a Texas Wildflower , 2014, Current Biology.

[44]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Comparison of pollination and defensive buzzes in bumblebees indicates species-specific and context-dependent vibrations , 2014, Naturwissenschaften.

[45]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[46]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  What's the 'buzz' about? The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination. , 2013, Current opinion in plant biology.

[47]  S. Johnson,et al.  Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals. , 2013, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  D. Goulson,et al.  Variability in bumblebee pollination buzzes affects the quantity of pollen released from flowers , 2012, Oecologia.

[49]  P. K. Endress.  The Immense Diversity of Floral Monosymmetry and Asymmetry Across Angiosperms , 2012, The Botanical Review.

[50]  J. Thomson,et al.  Interspecific competition in pollination systems: costs to male fitness via pollen misplacement , 2012 .

[51]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids are Fertilised by Insects , 2011 .

[52]  Ws. Rasband.  ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA , 2011 .

[53]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Ontogeny of worker body size distribution in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies , 2010, Ecological entomology.

[54]  S. Barrett.  Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  S. Johnson,et al.  Coevolution Between Food-Rewarding Flowers and Their Pollinators , 2010, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[56]  J. Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[57]  John Fox,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Generalized Linear Models , 2008 .

[58]  L. Harder,et al.  Floral evolution and male reproductive success: Optimal dispensing schedules for pollen dispersal by animal-pollinated plants , 1994, Evolutionary Ecology.

[59]  Cathie Martin,et al.  Convergent evolution within the genus Solanum: the specialised anther cone develops through alternative pathways. , 2004, Gene.

[60]  S. Hodges,et al.  Verne Grant and evolutionary studies of Aquilegia , 2003 .

[61]  Kazuo Suzuki,et al.  The function of each sepal in pollinator behavior and effective pollination in Aconitum japonicum var. montanum , 2001 .

[62]  J C Stout.  Does size matter? Bumblebee behaviour and the pollination of Cytisus scoparius L. (Fabaceae) , 2000 .

[63]  L. Harder,et al.  The functional significance of poricidal anthers and buzz pollination: controlled pollen removal from Dodecatheon , 1994 .

[64]  T. Laverty.  Bumble bee learning and flower morphology , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  S. Renner.  Pollination Ecology ‐ A Practical Approach , 1993 .

[66]  H. Hansen,et al.  Pollen residing in safe sites on honey bee foragers. , 1990 .

[67]  C. Herrera.  Components of pollinator "quality": comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage , 1987 .

[68]  K. Faegri.  The solanoid flower , 1986 .

[69]  Lawrence D. Harder,et al.  Morphology as a Predictor of Flower Choice by Bumble Bees , 1985 .

[70]  R. Silberglied.  Communication in the Ultraviolet , 1979 .

[71]  S. Vogel.  Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers , 1978 .

[72]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  Convergent evolution. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[73]  L. W. Macior.  POLLINATION ADAPTATION IN PEDICULARIS GROENLANDICA , 1968 .