Experimental Analysis of the Channel Busy Time in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks

To maintain the benefits of fast growing Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks (VANETs), Congestion Control (CC) algorithms are used to reduce channel congestion even under harsh communication conditions in order to achieve a reliable service. Reactive channel load (CL) based CC mechanisms, like Decentralized Congestion Control (DCC), therefore hardly rely on accurate CL values to work at best effort. While continuous probing of the channel obviously offers the best accuracy, it is not always possible or necessary, as illustrated in this paper. Instead estimation methods are used which may vary in accuracy through their parameter settings. The aim of this paper is to investigate the impact of synchronization and the measuring interval length for time (in-)variant CL as well as number and distribution of probes for the channel busy time. Various measurements, which are retrieved from an experimental set-up, are used for a theoretical evaluation. I illustrate that accuracy strongly varies and also suffers from the use of certain parameters, especially the measuring interval length and the synchronization effect which is of major interest for time (in-)variant CL occurring in VANETs. Furthermore the paper reveals that simple constant probing can, in terms of accuracy, outperform uniformly distributed probes used so far.

[1]  Charles E. Rohrs,et al.  LIMERIC: A Linear Adaptive Message Rate Algorithm for DSRC Congestion Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[2]  Sebastian Bader,et al.  Measuring channel occupancy for 802.11 wireless LAN in the 2.4 GHz ISM band , 2012, MSWiM '12.

[3]  Peter Dely,et al.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of the channel busy fraction in IEEE 802.11 , 2010, 2010 Future Network & Mobile Summit.

[4]  Intelligent Transport Systems (its); Decentralized Congestion Control Mechanisms for Intelligent Transport Systems Operating in the 5 Ghz Range; Access Layer Part , 2022 .

[5]  Gang Wu,et al.  Passive and accurate traffic load estimation for infrastructure-mode wireless lan , 2007, MSWiM '07.

[6]  Thomas Kürner,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle IEEE 802.11p performance measurements at urban intersections , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[7]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  On physical carrier sensing in wireless ad hoc networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[8]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Introduction to probability models , 1975 .

[9]  Tessa Tielert Rate-Adaptation Based Congestion Control for Vehicle Safety Communications , 2014 .

[10]  Hyogon Kim,et al.  Preventing Unfairness in the ETSI Distributed Congestion Control , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Marc Torrent Moreno,et al.  Inter-vehicle communications - achieving safety in a distributed wireless environment. Challenges, systems and protocols , 2007 .

[12]  Reinhard German,et al.  A performance study of cooperative awareness in ETSI ITS G5 and IEEE WAVE , 2013, 2013 10th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[13]  Hongqiang Zhai,et al.  How well can the IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN support quality of service? , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.