Centrifuge modelling for seismic response of single pile for wind turbine subjected to lateral load

Abstract The soil around the pile foundations of offshore wind turbines (OWTs) would suffer from earthquakes which are widely believed to undermine the bearing capacity and serviceability of foundations. The non-intermittent lateral environmental loads in the ocean (e.g., wave, wind, and current) continuously act on OWTs. However, the seismic response of pile foundations and the soil around is less clear when considering the OWTs are subjected to lateral environmental loads. This paper presents two sets of centrifuge modelling tests on single piles, with a prototype diameter (D) of 1.5 m and a first-order natural frequency highly comparable to that of a prototype wind turbine. Two model piles with the same dimension and stiffness, but one with a lateral load on the pile head, were both installed in a dry sand ground and a saturated sand ground. Owing to the fact that the lateral load increased the initial static shear stresses of the soil in front of the pile, the development of excess pore pressure was inhibited and the permanent ground lateral displacement was accumulated during shaking. The existence of the lateral load led to a pile head displacement as much as 34 cm and increased the bending moment along the pile up to 6 MN·m. Moreover, the seismic response of piles and soils were compared between the dry sand ground and saturated sand ground to clarify the influence of excess pore pressure. It was also found that the residual bending moment after unloading the pile was still very large up to 17 MN·m because of the rebalanced soil-pile interaction. These findings highlight the necessity to consider the lateral load effect in the seismic design of pile foundations for OWTs.

[1]  V. Drnevich,et al.  SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING IN SOILS: DESIGN EQUATIONS AND CURVES , 1972 .

[2]  Robert J. Mair,et al.  Discussion on the use of physical models in design , 1979 .

[3]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data , 1983 .

[4]  Yoginder P. Vaid,et al.  Confining Pressure, Grain Angularity, and Liquefaction , 1985 .

[5]  Yasuyuki Koga,et al.  SHAKING TABLE TESTS OF EMBANKMENTS RESTING ON LIQUEFIABLE SANDY GROUND , 1990 .

[6]  Mourad Zeghal,et al.  Analysis of Site Liquefaction Using Earthquake Records , 1994 .

[7]  Bruce L. Kutter,et al.  Recent Advances in Centrifuge Modeling of Seismic Shaking , 1995 .

[8]  O. Pallara,et al.  Shear Modulus and Damping of Soils , 1997 .

[9]  D. J. Wilson,et al.  SOIL-PILE-SUPERSTRUCTURE INTERACTION IN LIQUEFYING SAND AND SOFT CLAY , 1998 .

[10]  Donald E. Yule,et al.  The influence of confining stress on liquefaction resistance , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel W. Wilson,et al.  Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction Experiments and Analyses , 1999 .

[12]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Centrifuge cone penetration tests in sand , 1999 .

[13]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Monotonic lateral loading of piles in calcareous sand , 2001 .

[14]  Yoginder P. Vaid,et al.  Confining stress and static shear effects in cyclic liquefaction , 2001 .

[15]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Back calculated p-y relation of liquefied soils from large shaking table tests , 2001 .

[16]  R. Dobry,et al.  Evaluation of pile foundation response to lateral spreading , 2002 .

[17]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Static, seismic and stability analyses of a prototype wind turbine steel tower , 2002 .

[18]  Charalampos Baniotopoulos,et al.  Analysis and design of the prototype of a steel 1-MW wind turbine tower , 2003 .

[19]  G. Houlsby,et al.  Foundations for offshore wind turbines , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  S. Ha,et al.  An alternative mechanism of pile failure in liquefiable deposits during earthquakes , 2004 .

[21]  Spg Madabhushi,et al.  Evaluation of Shear Modulus and Damping in Dynamic Centrifuge Tests , 2005 .

[22]  Ross W. Boulanger,et al.  Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests , 2005 .

[23]  Kohji Tokimatsu,et al.  Effects of inertial and kinematic interaction on seismic behavior of pile with embedded foundation , 2005 .

[24]  Jiro Takemura,et al.  Liquefaction-induced large displacement of pile-supported wharf , 2005 .

[25]  R. Dobry,et al.  Effect of Soil Permeability on Centrifuge Modeling of Pile Response to Lateral Spreading , 2006 .

[26]  Misko Cubrinovski,et al.  Interpretation from large-scale shake table tests on piles undergoing lateral spreading in liquefied soils , 2006 .

[27]  Yan-Guo Zhou,et al.  Laboratory Investigation on Assessing Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils by Shear Wave Velocity , 2007 .

[28]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Catalogue of scaling laws and similitude questions in geotechnical centrifuge modelling , 2007 .

[29]  Yasuhiro Shamoto,et al.  Verification of the Soil-Type Specific Correlation between Liquefaction Resistance and Shear-Wave Velocity of Sand by Dynamic Centrifuge Test , 2010 .

[30]  Yan-Guo Zhou,et al.  Development of a large geotechnical centrifuge at Zhejiang University , 2010 .

[31]  Stuart K. Haigh,et al.  Centrifuge modelling of pile-soil interaction in liquefiable slopes , 2011 .

[32]  H. Y. Sze,et al.  Cyclic Strength of Sand under Sustained Shear Stress , 2011 .

[33]  Ian Prowell,et al.  An experimental and numerical study of wind turbine seismic behavior , 2011 .

[34]  H. Y. Sze,et al.  Cyclic behaviour and resistance of saturated sand under non-symmetrical loading conditions , 2011 .

[35]  Bin Zhu,et al.  Large-Scale Modeling and Theoretical Investigation of Lateral Collisions on Elevated Piles , 2012 .

[36]  George Gazetas,et al.  Pile-Group Response to Large Soil Displacements and Liquefaction: Centrifuge Experiments versus a Physically Simplified Analysis , 2013 .

[37]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Centrifuge Modeling Studies of Site Response in Soft Clay over Wide Strain Range , 2014 .

[38]  F. Gelagoti,et al.  Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines subjected to wave and earthquake loading: effect of soil–foundation interface , 2014 .

[39]  Charles Wang Wai Ng,et al.  Influence of sand density and retaining wall stiffness on three-dimensional responses of tunnel to basement excavation , 2015 .

[40]  Wei Li,et al.  Joint earthquake and wave action on the monopile wind turbine foundation: An experimental study , 2015 .

[41]  Andrew Brennan,et al.  Influence of initial stress distribution on liquefaction-induced settlement of shallow foundations , 2015 .

[42]  Xiangwu Zeng,et al.  Centrifuge modeling of offshore wind foundations under earthquake loading , 2015 .

[43]  Sebastian Thöns,et al.  Wind turbines and seismic hazard : A state-of-the-art review , 2016 .

[44]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Hybrid foundation for offshore wind turbines: Environmental and seismic loading , 2016 .

[45]  M. Randolph,et al.  Scour effects on p-y curves for shallowly embedded piles in sand , 2016 .

[46]  B. Zhu,et al.  Centrifuge model tests on laterally loaded piles in sand , 2016 .

[47]  Xu Yang,et al.  Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine , 2017 .

[48]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Model Test and Numerical Analysis of a Multi-Pile Offshore Wind Turbine Under Seismic, Wind, Wave, and Current Loads , 2017 .

[49]  K. Goda,et al.  Seismic performance assessment of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines using unscaled natural earthquake records , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[50]  Yan-Guo Zhou,et al.  Zhejiang University benchmark centrifuge test for LEAP-GWU-2015 and liquefaction responses of a sloping ground , 2017, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[51]  Xiangwu Zeng,et al.  Seismic response of offshore wind turbine with hybrid monopile foundation based on centrifuge modelling , 2019, Applied Energy.

[52]  B. Zhu,et al.  Experimental study on lateral pile–soil interaction of offshore tetrapod piled jacket foundations in sand , 2019, Canadian Geotechnical Journal.