Efficacy of ImageJ in the assessment of apoptosis

AbstractObjectiveTo verify the efficacy of ImageJ 1.43 n in determining the extent of apoptosis which is a complex and multistep process.Study DesignCisplatin in different concentrations was used to induce apoptosis in cultured Hep2 cells. Cell viability assay and nuclear image analysis of stained Hep2 cells were used to discriminate apoptotic cells and cells suspected to be undergoing apoptosis from control cells based on parameters such as nuclear area, circularity, perimeter and nuclear area factor (NAF), in association with visual morphology.ResultsImage analysis revealed a progressive and highly significant decrease in nuclear area factor detected in apoptotic cells and in cells suspected of undergoing apoptosis compared to the control cells (P-values < 0.01). Some of the other studied parameters showed also the same trend. This decrease was assumed to indicate DNA loss. Image analysis results correlated positively and significantly with the results obtained by cell viability assay (R = 0.958, P-value = 0.042). NAF was the most reliable parameter in assessment of apoptosis.ConclusionNuclear area factor can be calculated using powerful free and open-source software. Consequently, a quantitative measure of apoptosis can be obtained that is linked to morphological changes. ImageJ 1.43 n may therefore provide a useful tool for the assessment and discrimination of apoptotic cells.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/5929043086367338

[1]  X. M. Sun,et al.  Key morphological features of apoptosis may occur in the absence of internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  Yigong Shi,et al.  Mechanisms of caspase activation and inhibition during apoptosis. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[3]  C. Sheehan,et al.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  M Desco,et al.  Automatic quantification of viability in epithelial cell cultures by texture analysis , 2003, Journal of microscopy.

[5]  Daniel S. Miller,et al.  Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. , 2000, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[6]  B. Zhivotovsky,et al.  Review: nuclear events in apoptosis. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[8]  R L Ornberg Proliferation and Apoptosis Measurements by Color Image Analysis Based on Differential Absorption , 2001, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[9]  O. Nativ,et al.  A comparison between histological grade and nuclear morphometry for predicting the clinical outcome of localized renal cell carcinoma. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[10]  V. Girish,et al.  Affordable image analysis using NIH Image/ImageJ. , 2004, Indian journal of cancer.

[11]  M. Cannas,et al.  Morphometric Quantification of Apoptotic Stages in Cell Culture , 2005, Cells Tissues Organs.

[12]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  Nuclear changes in apoptosis. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.

[14]  M. Mello,et al.  Image analysis of DNA fragmentation and loss in V79 cells under apoptosis , 2000 .

[15]  A. Martelli,et al.  Nuclear apoptotic changes: An overview , 2001, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[16]  M. DeCoster,et al.  Quantification of sPLA2-induced early and late apoptosis changes in neuronal cell cultures using combined TUNEL and DAPI staining. , 2004, Brain research. Brain research protocols.

[17]  A. Wyllie,et al.  Chromatin changes in apoptosis , 1981, The Histochemical Journal.