FACTORS AFFECTING THE GENETIC LOAD IN DROSOPHILA: SYNERGISTIC EPISTASIS AND CORRELATIONS AMONG FITNESS COMPONENTS

Abstract Two factors that can affect genetic load, synergistic epistasis and sexual selection, were investigated in Drosophila melanogaster. A set of five chromosomal regions containing visible recessive mutations were put together in all combinations to create a full set of 32 homozygous lines fixed for different numbers of known mutations. Two measures of fitness were made for each line: productivity (a combined measure of fecundity and egg-to-adult survivorship) and competitive male mating success. Productivity, but not male mating success, showed a pattern of strong average synergistic epistasis, such that the log fitness declined nonlinearly with increasing numbers of mutations. Synergistic epistasis is known to reduce the mutation load. Both fitness components show some positive and some negative interactions between specific sets of mutations. Furthermore, alleles with deleterious effects on productivity tend to also diminish male mating success. Given that male mating success can affect relative fitness without changing the mean productivity of a population, these additional effects would lead to lower frequencies and lower fixation rates of deleterious alleles without higher costs to the mean fitness of the population. Corresponding Editor: A. Caballero

[1]  A. Kondrashov.  Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. , 1982, Genetical research.

[2]  M. Johnston,et al.  Mutation Rates and Dominance Levels of Genes Affecting Total Fitness in Two Angiosperm Species , 1995, Science.

[3]  M. Grahn,et al.  Female choice selects for a viability-based male trait in pheasants , 1989, Nature.

[4]  R. Hoekstra,et al.  Synergistic epistasis between loci affecting fitness: evidence in plants and fungi. , 1998 .

[5]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[6]  J. D. de Visser,et al.  An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas. , 1997, Genetics.

[7]  B. Charlesworth.  The effect of synergistic epistasis on the inbreeding load. , 1998, Genetical research.

[8]  W. Ewens.  Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits , 1999 .

[9]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[10]  A. Kondrashov.  Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Reinhard Bürger,et al.  MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS IN SEXUAL POPULATIONS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effects of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. I. Variances and covariances of life history traits. , 1994, Genetics.

[13]  R. Hoekstra,et al.  TEST OF INTERACTION BETWEEN GENETIC MARKERS THAT AFFECT FITNESS IN ASPERGILLUS NIGER , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  T MUKAI,et al.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. , 1964, Genetics.

[15]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Why sex and recombination? , 1998, Science.

[16]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. , 1977, Annual review of genetics.

[17]  K. Hughes.  THE EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF MALE LIFE‐HISTORY CHARACTERS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  DELETERIOUS MUTATION AND THE EVOLUTION OF GENETIC LIFE CYCLES , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  D. Lindsley,et al.  The Genome of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1992 .

[20]  M. Valero,et al.  Transition from haploidy to diploidy , 1991, Nature.

[21]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[22]  M. Whitlock.  FIXATION OF NEW ALLELES AND THE EXTINCTION OF SMALL POPULATIONS: DRIFT LOAD, BENEFICIAL ALLELES, AND SEXUAL SELECTION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  L. Partridge.  Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit flies , 1980, Nature.

[24]  T. Mukai.  The Genetic Structure of Natural Populations of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. VII Synergistic Interaction of Spontaneous Mutant Polygenes Controlling Viability. , 1969, Genetics.

[25]  R. Lande.  RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  H. Muller,et al.  Our load of mutations. , 1950, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[28]  M. Lynch,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Recombination and the evolution of diploidy. , 1992, Genetics.

[30]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[31]  R. Lenski,et al.  Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria , 1997, Nature.

[32]  N. Barton,et al.  A general model for the evolution of recombination. , 1995, Genetical research.

[33]  M. Lynch,et al.  MUTATION AND EXTINCTION: THE ROLE OF VARIABLE MUTATIONAL EFFECTS, SYNERGISTIC EPISTASIS, BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS, AND DEGREE OF OUTCROSSING , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Muller's ratchet under epistatic selection. , 1994, Genetics.

[35]  K. Norris.  Heritable variation in a plumage indicator of viability in male great tits Parus major , 1993, Nature.

[36]  M W Feldman,et al.  Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. , 1997, Theoretical population biology.

[37]  J. Willis.  EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INBREEDING ON FITNESS COMPONENTS IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  M. Lynch,et al.  Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[39]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[40]  A. D. Peters,et al.  Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations. , 1998, Genetics.

[41]  A. Kondrashov.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[42]  James F. Crow,et al.  Genetic Loads and the Cost of Natural Selection , 1970 .

[43]  B. Wallace.  Fifty Years of Genetic Load: An Odyssey , 1991 .

[44]  J. Crow,et al.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? , 1991, Nature.