Cooperative switched combining for wireless body area networks

Characterization of cooperative switched combining (SwC), for the `everyday' wireless body area network (BAN) wireless channel, is presented. A decode-and-forward protocol is chosen for the on-body cooperative BAN. The outage probability of two and three-branch cooperative coherent SwC, where the three-branch cooperative SwC is implemented as a variant of switch-and-examine combining, is compared with that for cooperative coherent selection combining (SC). Three typical locations for relays/hubs are considered, along with seven typical sensor locations, all on-body. The outage performance of SwC is not considerably degraded when compared to SC, and there is still significant improvement over direct single-link communications. However the benefit of SwC with respect to SC is demonstrated in terms of the switching rate between branches, which for both two and three-branch SwC is considerably smaller, between 12% and 32% of that of SC for any hub and relay/s locations. This may allow for easier implementation in practical IEEE 802.15.6 BAN.

[1]  Leif Hanlen,et al.  Open-source testbed for Body Area Networks: 200 sample/sec, 12 hrs continuous measurement , 2010, 2010 IEEE 21st International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications Workshops.

[2]  George K. Karagiannidis,et al.  Selective Cooperative Relaying over Time-Varying Channels , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[3]  David W. Smith,et al.  Cooperative receive diversity for coded GFSK body-area communications , 2011 .

[4]  Jean-Marie Gorce,et al.  Performance evaluation of direct and cooperative transmissions in body area networks , 2011, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[5]  A. Fort,et al.  An ultra-wideband body area propagation channel Model-from statistics to implementation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[6]  Yifan Chen,et al.  Cooperative Communications in Ultra-Wideband Wireless Body Area Networks: Channel Modeling and System Diversity Analysis , 2009, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[7]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Performance analysis of multibranch switched diversity systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[8]  L. Hanlen,et al.  Statistical characterization of the dynamic narrowband body area channel , 2008, 2008 First International Symposium on Applied Sciences on Biomedical and Communication Technologies.

[9]  Virtual Bridged,et al.  IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Specification for 802.3 Full Duplex Operation , 1997, IEEE Std 802.3x-1997 and IEEE Std 802.3y-1997 (Supplement to ISO/IEC 8802-3: 1996/ANSI/IEEE Std 802.3, 1996 Edition).

[10]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  Analysis of switched diversity systems on generalized-fading channels , 1994, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  David B. Smith,et al.  Cooperative body-area-communications: First and second-order statistics with decode-and-forward , 2012, 2012 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[12]  N.C. Beaulieu,et al.  Switching rates of two-branch selection diversity in κ-μ and α-μ distributed fadings , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  Raffaele D'Errico,et al.  A Performance Evaluation of Cooperative Schemes for On-Body Area Networks Based on Measured Time-Variant Channels , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[14]  L. Hanlen,et al.  Temporal correlation of dynamic on-body area radio channel , 2009 .