Attraction of Different Trichogramma Species to Prays oleae Sex Pheromone

ABSTRACT Chemical cues play a major role in the process of host selection by parasitoids, a process that has been discriminated into several steps such as habitat location, host location, and host acceptance. Egg parasitoids are known to rely on infochemicals of the adult host stage, e.g., pheromones, rather than cues emitted by the inconspicuous host eggs themselves. Here, we show that three different Trichogramma (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) species were attracted to the synthetic sex pheromone of the olive, Olea europea L., pest Prays oleae (Bern) (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). In Y-tube olfactometer experiments, we revealed differences in the behavior of four tested Trichogramma strains to different concentrations of the host pheromone. Although wasps of Trichogramma oleae (Voegele & Poitale) (IO47) were significantly attracted to two concentrations of the host pheromone, another strain of the same species (IO24) did not show a response to any offered concentrations. Trichogramma cacoeciae Marchai females showed greatest attraction toward the pheromone to three of five offered concentrations. Bioassays with Trichogramma bourarachae Pintureau & Babault wasps showed a positive response of the parasitoids to three concentrations of the host pheromone. Detection of the moth sex pheromone may result in an enhanced searching effort by Trichogramma wasps in an area with host eggs and eventually lead to an increased parasitism rate of these eggs. The results of this research should help enhancing the efficacy of the use of Trichogramma wasps as biocontrol agents against the olive pest.

[1]  B. Mazomenos,et al.  Kairomonal effect of sex pheromone components of two lepidopteran olive pests on Trichogramma wasps , 2009 .

[2]  T. Bukovinszky,et al.  Hitch-hiking parasitic wasp learns to exploit butterfly antiaphrodisiac , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  T. Meiners,et al.  Foraging behavior of egg parasitoids exploiting chemical information , 2008 .

[4]  J. Pereira,et al.  Egg parasitoids of the genus Trichogramma (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) in olive groves of the Mediterranean region , 2007 .

[5]  M. Dicke,et al.  The Response Specificity of Trichogramma Egg Parasitoids towards Infochemicals during Host Location , 2007, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[6]  A. Herz,et al.  Are indigenous strains of Trichogramma sp. (Hym., Trichogrammatidae) better candidates for biological control of lepidopterous pests of the olive tree? , 2006 .

[7]  A. Davison,et al.  A comparison of naïve and conditioned responses of three generalist endoparasitoids of lepidopteran larvae to host-induced plant odours , 2006 .

[8]  T. Shanower,et al.  Habitat and plant specificity of Trichogramma egg parasitoids—underlying mechanisms and implications , 2005 .

[9]  M. Dicke,et al.  Oviposition‐induced plant cues: do they arrest Trichogramma wasps during host location? , 2005 .

[10]  Nina E. Fatouros,et al.  Chemical communication: Butterfly anti-aphrodisiac lures parasitic wasps , 2005, Nature.

[11]  S. Wakamura,et al.  Phoretic egg parasitoid,Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), uses sex pheromone of tussock mothEuproctis taiwana (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) as a kairomone , 1996, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[12]  L. Kaiser,et al.  Olfactory responses ofTrichogramma maidis Pint, et Voeg.: Effects of chemical cues and behavioral plasticity , 1989, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[13]  D. Hall,et al.  Laboratory and field studies of the female sex pheromone of the olive moth,Prays oleae , 1979, Experientia.

[14]  J. R. Aldrich,et al.  Influence of Host Pheromone on Egg Parasitism by Scelionid Wasps: Comparison of Phoretic and Nonphoretic Parasitoids , 2000, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[15]  K. Boo,et al.  Kairomones Used by Trichogramma chilonis to Find Helicoverpa assulta Eggs , 2000, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[16]  T. Shanower,et al.  Volatile Plant Infochemicals Mediate Plant Preference of Trichogramma chilonis , 1997, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[17]  S. Colazza,et al.  Response of Egg Parasitoid Telenomus busseolae to Sex Pheromone of Sesamia nonagrioides , 1997, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[18]  C. Durier,et al.  Effect of kairomones from egg and female adult stages ofOstrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) onTrichogramma brassicae Bezdenko (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae) female kinesis , 1992, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[19]  W. J. Lewis,et al.  Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[20]  W. J. Lewis,et al.  Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects , 1975, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[21]  Á. Guerrero,et al.  Olfactory Responses of Plutella xylostella Natural Enemies to Host Pheromone, Larval Frass, and Green Leaf Cabbage Volatiles , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[22]  S. Wakamura,et al.  Two Regional Strains of a Phoretic Egg Parasitoid, Telenomus euproctidis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), That Use Different Sex Pheromones of Two Allopatric Tussock Moth Species as Kairomones , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[23]  L. Hemerik,et al.  Linking foraging behavior to lifetime reproductive success for an insect parasitoid: adaptation to host distributions , 2003 .

[24]  J. Loon,et al.  Chemoecology of parasitoid and predator oviposition behaviour , 2008 .

[25]  J. V. van Lenteren,et al.  A greenhouse without pesticides: fact or fantasy? , 2000 .

[26]  S. Smith,et al.  Biological control with Trichogramma: advances, successes, and potential of their use. , 1996, Annual review of entomology.

[27]  D. Andow,et al.  Biological Control: Use of Trichogramma in Maize – Estimating Environmental Risks , 1995 .

[28]  W. J. Bell,et al.  Chemical Ecology of Insects 2 , 1995, Springer US.

[29]  L. Noldus,et al.  Moth sex pheromone adsorption to leaf surface: bridge in time for chemical spies , 1991 .

[30]  S. Vinson Chemical signals used by parasitoids. , 1991 .

[31]  Louise E. M. Vet,et al.  How To Hunt for Hiding Hosts: the Reliability-Detectability Problem in Foraging Parasitoids , 1990 .

[32]  L. Kaiser,et al.  Behavioural study of plasticity in host preferences of Trichogramma maidis (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) , 1989 .

[33]  L. Noldus Response of the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum to the sex pheromone of its host Heliothis zea , 1988 .

[34]  J. Perry,et al.  FURTHER OBSERVATIONS ON THE RESPONSES OF MALE PEA MOTH, CYDIA NIGRICANA, TO VEGETATION PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO SEX‐ATTRACTANT , 1983 .

[35]  A. Greenway,et al.  CONTAMINATION OF VEGETATION WITH SYNTHETIC SEX‐ATTRACTANT RELEASED FROM TRAPS FOR THE PEA MOTH, CYDIA NIGRICANA , 1981 .

[36]  C. Clausen Phoresy Among Entomophagous Insects , 1976 .