Morse Things: A Design Inquiry into the Gap Between Things and Us

Applying a thing-centered, material speculation approach we designed the Morse Things to acknowledge and inquire into the gap between things and us. The Morse Things are sets of ceramic bowls and cups networked together to independently communicate through Morse code in an Internet of Things (IoT). We deployed the Morse Things in the households of six interaction design practitioners and researchers for six weeks. Following the deployment, we conducted a workshop to discuss the role of the Morse Things and ultimately the gap between things and people. We reflect on the nature of living with IoT things and discuss insights into the gap between things and humans that led to the idea of a new type of thing in the home that is neither human-centered technology nor non-digital artifacts.

[1]  Graham Harman,et al.  Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures , 2010 .

[2]  Susan S. Lukesh.  The internet of things , 2014, INROADS.

[3]  P. Howard.  Pax Technica: How the Internet of Things May Set Us Free or Lock Us Up , 2015 .

[4]  Aaron J. Quigley,et al.  The Broken Dream of Pervasive Sentient Ambient Calm Invisible Ubiquitous Computing , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Living In A Prototype: A Reconfigured Space , 2016, CHI.

[6]  Mario Romero,et al.  From texting app to braille literacy , 2012, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Johan Redström,et al.  Materializing infrastructures for participatory hacking , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[8]  Peter Tolmie,et al.  A Day in the Life of Things in the Home , 2016, CSCW.

[9]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[10]  Eric Paulos,et al.  A phenomenology of human-electricity relations , 2011, CHI.

[11]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Intersecting with Unaware Objects , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[12]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design , 2013, TCHI.

[13]  James Pierce,et al.  Material awareness: promoting reflection on everyday materiality , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Understanding why we preserve some things and discard others in the context of interaction design , 2009, CHI.

[15]  Richard Banks,et al.  Long living chair , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[16]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Pervasive computing: vision and challenges , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[17]  Ben Matthews,et al.  Trust Me: Doubts and Concerns Living with the Internet of Things , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[18]  Donghoon Chang.  Tuesday Keynote: UX Design in the IoT Era , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[19]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[20]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  What next, ubicomp?: celebrating an intellectual disappearing act , 2012, UbiComp.

[21]  Gerald L. Bruns,et al.  Theory of prose , 1990 .

[22]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[23]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[24]  Peter-Paul Verbeek,et al.  Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things , 2011 .

[25]  Richard Harper,et al.  Inside the Smart Home , 2003, Springer London.

[26]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Electric materialities and interactive technology , 2013, CHI.

[27]  Richard Banks,et al.  From Research Prototype to Research Product , 2016, CHI.

[28]  Albert Borgmann,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. , 1986 .

[29]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[30]  Henry Lin,et al.  Material speculation: actual artifacts for critical inquiry , 2015, Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives.

[31]  Davis Baird,et al.  Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments , 2004 .

[32]  Robert Rosenberger,et al.  A field guide to postphenomenology , 2015 .

[33]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[34]  Tom Rodden,et al.  IoT: Designing for Human Values , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[35]  DourishPaul,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007 .

[36]  Chris Speed,et al.  Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[37]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[38]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry by Albert Borgmann (review) , 1986 .

[39]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  BinCam: Designing for Engagement with Facebook for Behavior Change , 2013, INTERACT.

[40]  Karin Slegers,et al.  I would DiYSE for it!: a manifesto for do-it-yourself internet-of-things creation , 2012, NordiCHI.

[41]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction , 2011, CHI.

[42]  Val Dusek,et al.  Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction , 2006 .

[43]  James H. Aylor,et al.  Computer for the 21st Century , 1999, Computer.

[44]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[45]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience , 2011, Design Issues.

[46]  I. Bogost.  Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing , 2012 .

[47]  Jessica Lingel,et al.  The Poetics of Socio-Technical Space: Evaluating the Internet of Things Through Craft , 2016, CHI.

[48]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[49]  D. Seed.  Theory of Prose , 1991 .