Detecting and visualizing online dispute dynamics in replying comments

In Web‐based social media (blogs, Internet forums, etc.), readers express their opinions by attaching reply comments to articles and understand others' perspectives by reading these comments. On Web forums, users discuss and argue with others via reply comments. Thus, a series of comments may provide new information, particularly about disputes among participants. Unfortunately, current systems for viewing reply comments are primitive; it is hard to follow disputes and their relationships by using such systems. We examine the characteristics of disputes by using reply comments and propose a novel system for automatically detecting disputes and their relationships among a large set of reply comments. This paper defines a dispute section as a series of comments where the dispute index is sufficiently high. The dispute index is determined using an exponential model with three control parameters. Next, the dispute relationship can be defined according to a pair of arguing commenters. The basic concept is to exploit the order of comment posting times and comment writer information when detecting dispute sections because the comments tend to appear in ordered pairs. The proposed system detects dispute sections and visualizes them according to dispute relationships among commenters, enabling users to appreciate the controversial structure of comments. To test the performance of our system, we constructed a dataset containing comment sequences associated with 40 articles collected from an Web forum. We constructed the set of dispute comments manually. We found that the detection accuracy of our system for disputes and their relationships were 83% and 78% on average. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[2]  Vicenç Gómez,et al.  Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in slashdot , 2008, WWW.

[3]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  First Steps to Netviz Nirvana: Evaluating Social Network Analysis with NodeXL , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[4]  Dana Walker,et al.  Blog commenting: A new political information space , 2007, ASIST.

[5]  John Mark Agosta,et al.  Highlighting disputed claims on the web , 2010, WWW '10.

[6]  Gilad Mishne,et al.  Leave a Reply: An Analysis of Weblog Comments , 2006 .

[7]  David Gross-Amblard,et al.  Discovering implicit communities in Web forums through ontologies , 2012, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[8]  Wolfgang Nejdl,et al.  How useful are your comments?: analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings , 2010, WWW '10.

[9]  Hwan-Gue Cho,et al.  How to Apply the Skip List to the Management of a Massive Set of Replying Comments in Web Bulletins by Exploiting the Power-Law Distribution , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology.

[10]  Hwan-Gue Cho,et al.  Visualizing dispute sections and relations from the sequence of replying comments , 2011, SAC '11.

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visualizing Threaded Conversation Networks: Mining Message Boards and Email Lists for Actionable Insights , 2010, AMT.

[12]  A. de Moor,et al.  An argumentation analysis of weblog conversations , 2000 .

[13]  Andrzej Grabowski Opinion formation in a social network: The role of human activity , 2009 .

[14]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .

[15]  Ee-Peng Lim,et al.  Comments-oriented blog summarization by sentence extraction , 2007, CIKM '07.

[16]  Liang Zhou,et al.  On the Summarization of Dynamically Introduced Information: Online Discussions and Blogs , 2006, AAAI Spring Symposium: Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs.

[17]  Barbara Rosario,et al.  What is disputed on the web? , 2010, WICOW '10.

[18]  Yun Kuei Huang,et al.  Study of Comments on Official Movie Blogs , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..