Constructing the ecological sanitation: a review on technology and methods

Abstract Wastewater often contains valuable resources (e.g. organic matter and nutrients). Different from conventional sanitation approaches, the ecological sanitation (Eco-San) system is based on the closure of material flow cycles to recover resources with minimized demands on other resources. The review comprehensively summarized the main components of the Eco-San system (user interface, collection and conveyance, storage and primary treatment, and reuse/disposal), the frequently-used evaluation methods, and the framework of evaluation index system. Some typical practical cases were discussed to demonstrate the managerial implications and popularize the applications of the Eco-San system. The results show that the Eco-San systems are beneficial to resource efficiency, agricultural use of the organic matters and nutrients, and energy recovery although some shortages exist (e.g. high cost, cultural constraints, and complex operation and management). The evaluation methods can help to identify the restriction factors, contributing factors and measures to improve the efficiency of the future Eco-San system. The setting, selection and quantification are three critical steps when using the evaluation indices to complete the evaluation process. This study not only provides the methods for both developing novel Eco-San systems (combinations of the components) and improving the Eco-San systems (evaluation of the combinations) to solve the wastewater problem in rural areas. Considering the challenges or limitations in the Eco-San research, the recommendations for future research may mainly focus on the combination of different components, methods for sustainability assessment, quantification of the evaluation index, and implementation of more real Eco-San cases.

[1]  Liang Lei,et al.  An industrial wastewater pollution degree evaluation method based on improved fuzzy evaluation theories , 2010, 2010 8th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation.

[2]  Viet Anh Nguyen,et al.  Optimising water and phosphorus management in the urban environmental sanitation system of Hanoi, Vietnam. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Ahmed N. Bdour,et al.  Perspectives on sustainable wastewater treatment technologies and reuse options in the urban areas of the Mediterranean region , 2007 .

[4]  Bindeshwar Pathak Sanitation is the key to healthy cities - a profile of Sulabh International , 1999 .

[5]  David Kay,et al.  Estimating the burden of disease from water, sanitation, and hygiene at a global level , 2002 .

[6]  Xu Dong,et al.  Application of constructed wetland for water pollution control in China during 1990–2010 , 2012 .

[7]  Daniel Sutter,et al.  Screening test battery for pharmaceuticals in urine and wastewater , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[8]  Willi Gujer,et al.  Estimating the precipitation potential in urine-collecting systems. , 2003, Water research.

[9]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Maria Elisa Magri,et al.  Inactivation of Pathogens in Feces by Desiccation and Urea Treatment for Application in Urine-Diverting Dry Toilets , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  Y. Shimizu,et al.  Predicting struvite formation for phosphorus recovery from human urine using an equilibrium model. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  Jeroen Langeveld,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty; a probabilistic evaluation framework for decision-making about sanitation systems in low-income countries. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Shyam R. Asolekar,et al.  Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making , 2012 .

[14]  George Tchobanoglous,et al.  Wastewater Engineering Treatment Disposal Reuse , 1972 .

[15]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Assessing the efficiency of wastewater treatment plants in an uncertain context: a DEA with tolerances approach , 2012 .

[17]  C. Werner,et al.  Ecological sanitation: Principles, technologies and project examples for sustainable wastewater and excreta management , 2009 .

[18]  M Maurer,et al.  Treatment processes for source-separated urine. , 2006, Water research.

[19]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Removal of carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater using a low investment, integrated treatment concept. , 2004, Water research.

[20]  M Nalubega,et al.  Bench-scale composting of source-separated human faeces for sanitation. , 2009, Waste management.

[21]  Björn Vinnerås,et al.  Fertiliser products from new sanitation systems: their potential values and risks. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[22]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Carbon Colloids Prepared by Hydrothermal Carbonization as Efficient Fuel for Indirect Carbon Fuel Cells , 2009 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty , 1982 .

[24]  W Martens,et al.  Overview of the ability of different treatment methods for liquid and solid manure to inactivate pathogens. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[25]  Odeh Al-Jayyousi Greywater reuse: knowledge management for sustainability , 2004 .

[26]  Fan Bin The Utilization Situation of Rural Biogas and Its Significance on Rural Domestic Wastewater Treatment:Example of Hebei and Shandong Province , 2012 .

[27]  Loreto Iglesias,et al.  A life cycle assessment comparison between centralized and decentralized biodiesel production from raw sunflower oil and waste cooking oils. , 2012 .

[28]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Energy Policy and Value Tradeoffs , 1975 .

[29]  Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş,et al.  An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation , 2008 .

[30]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..

[31]  M Poch,et al.  Assessment of wastewater treatment plant design for small communities: environmental and economic aspects. , 2012, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  Jun Bi,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of two operational models at industrial wastewater treatment plants in China: a case study in Shengze town, Suzhou City. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  K P Anagnostopoulos,et al.  USING THE FUZZY HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR SELECTING WASTEWATER FACILITIES AT PREFECTURE LEVEL , 2007 .

[34]  A. Howard A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications , 1991 .

[35]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Henry Bassett,et al.  210. Studies of phosphates. Part I. Ammonium magnesium phosphate and related compounds , 1933 .

[38]  Francesc Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach , 2009 .

[39]  F Brissaud,et al.  Low technology systems for wastewater treatment: perspectives. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[41]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[42]  J. Baeyens,et al.  Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge , 2008 .

[43]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[44]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  A Direct Synthesis of Mesoporous Carbons with Bicontinuous Pore Morphology from Crude Plant Material by Hydrothermal Carbonization , 2007 .

[45]  Tuomas Mattila,et al.  Comparison of carbon footprints and eutrophication impacts of rural on-site wastewater treatment plants in Finland , 2014 .

[46]  Heinz A. Preisig,et al.  Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems , 2002 .

[47]  Daniel Hellström,et al.  Storage of human urine: acidification as a method to inhibit decomposition of urea , 1999 .

[48]  Jörg E. Drewes,et al.  QUANTIFYING BIOLOGICAL ORGANIC CARBON REMOVAL IN GROUNDWATER RECHARGE SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[49]  S. A. Parsons,et al.  Phosphorus Recovery from Wastewater by Struvite Crystallization: A Review , 2009 .

[50]  Ilhan Talinli,et al.  Recovery of Ammonia from Human Urine by Stripping and Absorption , 2007 .

[51]  Judit Lienert,et al.  High acceptance of urine source separation in seven European countries: a review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[52]  N. Vlachakis,et al.  Energy consumption and membrane replacement cost for seawater RO desalination plants , 2003 .

[53]  A. R. Karimi,et al.  Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods , 2011 .

[54]  Thammarat Koottatep,et al.  Influence of sand layer depth and percolate impounding regime on nitrogen transformation in vertical-flow constructed wetlands treating faecal sludge. , 2009, Water research.

[55]  Ralf Otterpohl,et al.  Review of the technological approaches for grey water treatment and reuses. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[56]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: wastewater and water-reuse in a small town , 2007 .

[57]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[58]  Chuanbin Zhou,et al.  Ecological-economic assessment of ecological sanitation development in the cities of Chinese Loess Plateau , 2010 .

[59]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update , 2006 .

[60]  G Zeeman,et al.  Performance of UASB septic tank for treatment of concentrated black water within DESAR concept. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[61]  Dongqing Zhang,et al.  Constructed wetlands in China , 2009 .

[62]  Jin-Xiao Chen,et al.  A modified super-efficiency measure based on simultaneous input-output projection in data envelopment analysis , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[63]  M Oldenburg,et al.  Innovative technologies for decentralised water-, wastewater and biowaste management in urban and peri-urban areas. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[64]  Björn Vinnerås,et al.  Comparison of composting, storage and urea treatment for sanitising of faecal matter and manure. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[65]  Cécile Bulle,et al.  Comparison of black water source-separation and conventional sanitation systems using life cycle assessment. , 2014 .

[66]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Phosphate and potassium recovery from source separated urine through struvite precipitation. , 2007, Water research.

[67]  John L Gaunt,et al.  Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  Jyri Seppälä,et al.  Decision Analysis Frameworks for Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment , 2001 .

[69]  J. Rockström,et al.  An assessment of the effect of human faeces and urine on maize production and water productivity , 2005 .

[70]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model , 2011 .

[71]  N. Ren,et al.  Environmental profile of typical anaerobic/anoxic/oxic wastewater treatment systems meeting increasingly stringent treatment standards from a life cycle perspective. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[72]  Subhankar Karmakar,et al.  Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[73]  Håkan Jönsson SOURCE SEPARATION OF HUMAN URINE - SEPARATION EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTS ON WATER EMISSIONS, CROP YIELD, ENERGY USAGE AND RELIABILITY , 2002 .

[74]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[75]  Gary Haq,et al.  Exploiting the co-benefits of ecological sanitation , 2012 .

[76]  Qiong Zhang,et al.  Energy-nutrients-water nexus: integrated resource recovery in municipal wastewater treatment plants. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[77]  Zhenyao Shen,et al.  Key uncertainty sources analysis of water quality model using the first order error method , 2011 .

[78]  M. Bouzit,et al.  Cost–Effectiveness Analysis of Water Management Measures in Two River Basins of Jordan and Lebanon , 2009 .

[79]  L. Nies,et al.  Research advances in dry anaerobic digestion process of solid organic wastes. , 2011 .

[80]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic feasibility study for new technological alternatives in wastewater treatment processes: a review. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[81]  M. Schouten,et al.  Communal sanitation alternatives for slums: A case study of Kibera, Kenya , 2010 .

[82]  Kai Lei,et al.  Water quality assessment of Wei River, China using fuzzy synthetic evaluation , 2010 .

[83]  Chirjiv K Anand,et al.  Composting toilets as a sustainable alternative to urban sanitation--a review. , 2014, Waste management.

[84]  C. Müller Anaerobic Digestion of Biodegradable Solid Waste in Low- and Middle-Income Countries , 2007 .

[85]  Pradip Bhattacharyya,et al.  Human urine as a source of alternative natural fertilizer in agriculture: A flight of fancy or an achievable reality , 2011 .

[86]  Markus Antonietti,et al.  Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity , 2009 .

[87]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[88]  A. E. Johnston,et al.  Effectiveness of different precipitated phosphates as phosphorus sources for plants , 2003 .

[89]  Christian Remy,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and source separation systems for urban wastewater management , 2010 .

[90]  Eva Eriksson,et al.  Greywater pollution variability and loadings. , 2009 .

[91]  Austin Lm,et al.  Safety aspects of handling and using fecal material from urine-diversion toilets--a field investigation. , 2008 .

[92]  M Nalubega,et al.  Substrate composition and moisture in composting source‐separated human faeces and food waste , 2009, Environmental technology.

[93]  T A Larsen,et al.  Fate of major compounds in source-separated urine. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[94]  Julia W. Gaskin,et al.  Effect of Low-Temperature Pyrolysis Conditions on Biochar for Agricultural Use , 2008 .

[95]  Christoph Lüthi,et al.  Compendium of sanitation systems and technologies , 2008 .

[96]  P. L. Paulo,et al.  Natural systems treating greywater and blackwater on-site: Integrating treatment, reuse and landscaping , 2013 .

[97]  George P. Huber,et al.  Multi-Attribute Utility Models: A Review of Field and Field-Like Studies , 1974 .

[98]  E. Benetto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of ecological sanitation system for small-scale wastewater treatment. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[99]  R Otterpohl,et al.  The potential of nutrient reuse from a source-separated domestic wastewater system in Indonesia--case study: ecological sanitation pilot plant in Surabaya. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[100]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data , 2011 .

[101]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[102]  H Jönsson,et al.  Comparing microbial die-off in separately collected faeces with ash and sawdust additives. , 2009, Waste management.

[103]  J. Vymazal Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment , 2005 .

[104]  B. B. Baykal,et al.  Recovery of Plant Nutrients from Dilute Solutions of Human Urine and Preliminary Investigations on Pot Trials , 2012 .

[105]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental and economic profile of six typologies of wastewater treatment plants. , 2011, Water research.

[106]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: an empirical approach for Spain. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[107]  David N. Barton,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive , 2008 .

[108]  Ni-Bin Chang,et al.  Mining the fuzzy control rules of aeration in a Submerged Biofilm Wastewater Treatment Process , 2007, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[109]  J Wilsenach,et al.  Impact of separate urine collection on wastewater treatment systems. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[110]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[111]  M Molinos-Senante,et al.  Economic feasibility study for intensive and extensive wastewater treatment considering greenhouse gases emissions. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[112]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental performance of wastewater treatment plants for small populations , 2008 .

[113]  Guenter Langergraber,et al.  Ecological Sanitation--a way to solve global sanitation problems? , 2005, Environment international.

[114]  Yongzhong Feng,et al.  Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion , 2015 .