Sensitivity of scattering and absorbing aerosol direct radiative forcing to physical climate factors

[1] The direct radiative forcing of the climate system includes effects due to scattering and absorbing aerosols. This study explores how important physical climate characteristics contribute to the magnitudes of the direct radiative forcings (DRF) from anthropogenic sulfate, black carbon, and organic carbon. For this purpose, we employ the GFDL CM2.1 global climate model, which has reasonable aerosol concentrations and reconstruction of twentieth-century climate change. Sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols constitute the most important anthropogenic aerosol perturbations to the climate system and provide striking contrasts between primarily scattering (sulfate and organic carbon) and primarily absorbing (black carbon) species. The quantitative roles of cloud coverage, surface albedo, and relative humidity in governing the sign and magnitude of all-sky top-of-atmosphere (TOA) forcings are examined. Clouds reduce the global mean sulfate TOA DRF by almost 50%, reduce the global mean organic carbon TOA DRF by more than 30%, and increase the global mean black carbon TOA DRF by almost 80%. Sulfate forcing is increased by over 50% as a result of hygroscopic growth, while high-albedo surfaces are found to have only a minor (less than 10%) impact on all global mean forcings. Although the radiative forcing magnitudes are subject to uncertainties in the state of mixing of the aerosol species, it is clear that fundamental physical climate characteristics play a large role in governing aerosol direct radiative forcing magnitudes.

[1]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Anthropogenic Aerosols and the Weakening of the South Asian Summer Monsoon , 2011, Science.

[2]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Analysis of the biases in the downward shortwave surface flux in the GFDL CM2.1 general circulation model , 2011 .

[3]  Ramaswamy,et al.  The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3 , 2011 .

[4]  Nicolas Bellouin,et al.  Precipitation, radiative forcing and global temperature change , 2010 .

[5]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Two opposing effects of absorbing aerosols on global‐mean precipitation , 2010 .

[6]  M. Chin,et al.  Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models , 2009 .

[7]  A. Waple,et al.  Climate Projections Based on Emissions Scenarios for Long-Lived and Short-Lived Radiatively Active Gases and Aerosols , 2008 .

[8]  Peter A. Crozier,et al.  Brown Carbon Spheres in East Asian Outflow and Their Optical Properties , 2008, Science.

[9]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon , 2008 .

[10]  T. Reichler,et al.  How Well Do Coupled Models Simulate Today's Climate? , 2008 .

[11]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective , 2007 .

[12]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow , 2006 .

[13]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Evaluation of aerosol distribution and optical depth in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory coupled model CM2.1 for present climate , 2006 .

[14]  L. Horowitz Past, present, and future concentrations of tropospheric ozone and aerosols: Methodology, ozone evaluation, and sensitivity to aerosol wet removal , 2006 .

[15]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[16]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Impact of nonabsorbing anthropogenic aerosols on clear‐sky atmospheric absorption , 2006 .

[17]  R. Stouffer,et al.  Assessment of Twentieth-Century Regional Surface Temperature Trends using the GFDL CM2 Coupled Models , 2006 .

[18]  Differing regional responses to a perturbation in solar cloud absorption in the SKYHI general circulation model , 2006 .

[19]  S. Klein,et al.  GFDL's CM2 Global Coupled Climate Models. Part I: Formulation and Simulation Characteristics , 2006 .

[20]  T. Delworth,et al.  Have anthropogenic aerosols delayed a greenhouse gas‐induced weakening of the North Atlantic thermohaline circulation? , 2006 .

[21]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  The impact of aerosols on simulated ocean temperature and heat content in the 20th century , 2005 .

[22]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Direct radiative forcing of anthropogenic organic aerosol , 2005 .

[23]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global impacts of gas‐phase chemistry‐aerosol interactions on direct radiative forcing by anthropogenic aerosols and ozone , 2005 .

[24]  J. Hansen,et al.  Efficacy of climate forcings , 2005 .

[25]  Paul Ginoux,et al.  Assessment of the global impact of aerosols on tropospheric oxidants , 2005 .

[26]  S. Emori,et al.  Simulation of climate response to aerosol direct and indirect effects with aerosol transport‐radiation model , 2005 .

[27]  S. Klein,et al.  The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations , 2004 .

[28]  Thomas W. Kirchstetter,et al.  Evidence that the spectral dependence of light absorption by aerosols is affected by organic carbon , 2004 .

[29]  J. Hansen,et al.  Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Makiko Sato,et al.  Global atmospheric black carbon inferred from AERONET , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols , 2002 .

[32]  U. Lohmann Possible Aerosol Effects on Ice Clouds via Contact Nucleation , 2002 .

[33]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.

[34]  D. Koch Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM , 2001 .

[35]  J. Lamarque,et al.  A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2 , 2001 .

[36]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols , 2022 .

[37]  M. Jacobson Global direct radiative forcing due to multicomponent anthropogenic and natural aerosols , 2001 .

[38]  The GOCART Model Study of Aerosol Composition and Radiative Forcing: Present and Future , 2001 .

[39]  M. Jacobson A physically‐based treatment of elemental carbon optics: Implications for global direct forcing of aerosols , 2000 .

[40]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  A new multiple‐band solar radiative parameterization for general circulation models , 1999 .

[41]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[42]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Radiative effects of CH4, N2O, halocarbons and the foreign‐broadened H2O continuum: A GCM experiment , 1999 .

[43]  A Lacis,et al.  Climate forcings in the industrial era. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  James J. Hack,et al.  Response of Climate Simulation to a New Convective Parameterization in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM3) , 1998 .

[45]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Reply [to “Comments on ‘A limited‐area‐model case study of the effects of sub‐grid scale variations in relative humidity and cloud upon the direct radiative forcing of sulfate aerosol’”] , 1998 .

[46]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Global sensitivity studies of the direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic sulfate and black carbon aerosols , 1998 .

[47]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Quantifying the emission of light‐absorbing particles: Measurements tailored to climate studies , 1998 .

[48]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[49]  J. Haywood,et al.  Multi‐spectral calculations of the direct radiative forcing of tropospheric sulphate and soot aerosols using a column model , 1997 .

[50]  V. Ramaswamy,et al.  Linear additivity of climate response for combined albedo and greenhouse perturbations , 1997 .

[51]  Stephen E. Schwartz,et al.  Direct shortwave forcing of climate by the anthropogenic sulfate aerosol: Sensitivity to particle size, composition, and relative humidity , 1995 .

[52]  P. Chylek,et al.  Effect of absorbing aerosols on global radiation budget , 1995 .

[53]  K. E. Taylor,et al.  Response of the climate system to atmospheric aerosols and greenhouse gases , 1994, Nature.

[54]  J. Coakley,et al.  Climate Forcing by Anthropogenic Aerosols , 1992, Science.

[55]  Robert J. Charlson,et al.  Perturbation of the northern hemisphere radiative balance by backscattering from anthropogenic sulfate aerosols , 1991 .

[56]  B. Albrecht Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[57]  P. Chylek,et al.  Effect of Graphitic Carbon on the Albedo of Clouds , 1984 .

[58]  R. Cess Arctic aerosols: Model estimates of interactive influences upon the surface-atmosphere clearsky radiation budget , 1983 .

[59]  T. Ackerman,et al.  Absorption of visible radiation in atmosphere containing mixtures of absorbing and nonabsorbing particles. , 1981, Applied optics.

[60]  S. Twomey The Influence of Pollution on the Shortwave Albedo of Clouds , 1977 .