Resolution analysis of tomographic slug test head data: Two‐dimensional radial case
暂无分享,去创建一个
Daniel Paradis | René Lefebvre | Erwan Gloaguen | Bernard Giroux | R. Lefebvre | E. Gloaguen | D. Paradis | B. Giroux
[1] John Doherty,et al. Ground Water Model Calibration Using Pilot Points and Regularization , 2003, Ground water.
[2] A. N. Tikhonov,et al. REGULARIZATION OF INCORRECTLY POSED PROBLEMS , 1963 .
[3] M. Anderson. Hydrogeologic facies models to delineate large-scale spatial trends in glacial and glaciofluvial sediments , 1989 .
[4] Andres Alcolea,et al. Inverse problem in hydrogeology , 2005 .
[5] Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al. Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .
[6] T. Yeh,et al. Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .
[7] Yonghong Hao,et al. A temporal sampling strategy for hydraulic tomography analysis , 2013 .
[8] J. Doherty,et al. A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models , 2005 .
[9] James J. Butler,et al. Pumping tests in networks of multilevel sampling wells: Motivation and methodology , 1999 .
[10] J. D. Bredehoeft,et al. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Paper No. H-21 , 1966 .
[11] G. Forte,et al. A three-dimensional hydrogeological–geophysical model of a multi-layered aquifer in the coastal alluvial plain of Sarno River (southern Italy) , 2014, Hydrogeology Journal.
[12] Peter Dietrich,et al. An inversion strategy for hydraulic tomography: Coupling travel time and amplitude inversion , 2007 .
[13] André Revil,et al. Hydraulic conductivity field characterization from the joint inversion of hydraulic heads and self‐potential data , 2014 .
[14] A Revil,et al. A Potential‐Based Inversion of Unconfined Steady‐State Hydraulic Tomography , 2009, Ground water.
[15] Daniel Paradis,et al. Permeability Profiles in Granular Aquifers Using Flowmeters in Direct‐Push Wells , 2011, Ground water.
[16] Walter A. Illman,et al. Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .
[17] S. P. Neuman,et al. Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .
[18] Walter A. Illman,et al. Three‐dimensional transient hydraulic tomography in a highly heterogeneous glaciofluvial aquifer‐aquitard system , 2011 .
[19] James J. Butler,et al. Sensitivity analysis of slug tests Part 2. Observation wells , 1995 .
[20] James J. Butler,et al. Inherent Limitations of Hydraulic Tomography , 2010, Ground water.
[21] Peter Dietrich,et al. A field assessment of high‐resolution aquifer characterization based on hydraulic travel time and hydraulic attenuation tomography , 2011 .
[22] W. Menke. Geophysical data analysis : discrete inverse theory , 1984 .
[23] Martin Sauter,et al. Cross-well slug interference tests: An effective characterization method for resolving aquifer heterogeneity , 2010 .
[24] Peter K. Kitanidis,et al. A field proof‐of‐concept of aquifer imaging using 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with modular, temporarily‐emplaced equipment , 2012 .
[25] M. Cardiff,et al. 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography in unconfined aquifers with fast drainage response , 2011 .
[26] R. Lefebvre,et al. Single-well interference slug tests to assess the vertical hydraulic conductivity of unconsolidated aquifers , 2013 .
[27] Yuanyuan Zha,et al. Usefulness of flux measurements during hydraulic tomographic survey for mapping hydraulic conductivity distribution in a fractured medium , 2014 .
[28] Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al. Resolution and uncertainty in hydrologic characterization , 1997 .
[29] Peter Dietrich,et al. What information can we get from pumping tests?-comparing pumping test configurations using sensitivity coefficients , 2006 .
[30] Peter Dietrich,et al. Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .
[31] F. Spane. Applicability of Slug Interference Tests for Hydraulic Characterization of Unconfined Aquifers: (1) Analytical Assessment , 1996 .
[32] Yoram Rubin,et al. Three‐dimensional Bayesian geostatistical aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 Area using tracer test data , 2012 .
[33] Peter Bayer,et al. Hydraulic tomography analog outcrop study: Combining travel time and steady shape inversion , 2011 .
[34] Hiromitsu Saegusa,et al. Hydraulic tomography in fractured granite: Mizunami Underground Research site, Japan , 2009 .
[35] R. Lefebvre,et al. Conceptual model of leachate migration in a granular aquifer derived from the integration of multi-source characterization data (St-Lambert, Canada) , 2014, Hydrogeology Journal.
[36] James J. Butler,et al. Ir2dinv: a finite-difference model for inverse analysis of two-dimensional linear or radial groundwater flow , 2001 .
[37] Peter Dietrich,et al. A travel time based hydraulic tomographic approach , 2003 .
[38] P. Kitanidis. Quasi‐Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing , 1995 .
[39] James J. Butler,et al. Steady shape analysis of tomographic pumping tests for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2002 .
[40] W. Illman,et al. Comparison of Hydraulic Tomography with Traditional Methods at a Highly Heterogeneous Site , 2015, Ground water.
[41] Peter K. Kitanidis,et al. An interactive Bayesian geostatistical inverse protocol for hydraulic tomography , 2006 .
[42] Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al. A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .
[43] Philippe Renard,et al. Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog: Part 1: Field study , 2011 .
[44] Steven J. Berg,et al. Field Study of Subsurface Heterogeneity with Steady‐State Hydraulic Tomography , 2013, Ground water.
[45] Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al. Sensitivity and resolution of tomographic pumping tests in an alluvial aquifer , 2007 .
[46] René Lefebvre,et al. Hydraulic conductivity heterogeneity of a local deltaic aquifer system from the kriged 3D distribution of hydrofacies from borehole logs, Valcartier, Canada , 2008 .
[47] W. Menke. Chapter 10 – Factor Analysis , 2012 .
[48] R. Penrose. A Generalized inverse for matrices , 1955 .
[49] P. K. Kitanidis,et al. Large‐scale inverse modeling with an application in hydraulic tomography , 2011 .
[50] H. Bouwer,et al. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .
[51] Abraham Sageev,et al. Slug Test Analysis , 1986 .
[52] G. A. Bruggeman. The Reciprocity Principle in Flow Through Heterogeneous Porous Media , 1972 .
[53] Jet-Chau Wen,et al. A simultaneous successive linear estimator and a guide for hydraulic tomography analysis , 2009 .
[54] Andrew Binley,et al. Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations , 2005 .
[55] Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al. Robustness of joint interpretation of sequential pumping tests: Numerical and field experiments , 2011 .
[56] Walter A Illman,et al. Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.
[57] A. Rivera,et al. Field characterization and data integration to define the hydraulic heterogeneity of a shallow granular aquifer at a sub-watershed scale , 2014, Environmental Earth Sciences.