Efficacy of oral brush biopsy in potentially malignant disorder management

BACKGROUND Oral potentially malignant disorders (PMD) harbour unpredictable risk for squamous cell carcinoma development. Current management requires tissue biopsy for histopathology characterisation, dysplasia grading and targeted intervention to "high-risk" lesions, although evidence-based guidelines are limited and diagnoses subjective. This study investigated the use of adjunctive oral brush biopsy techniques during the management of PMD in a UK hospital population. METHODS Retrospective review of a 310 PMD patient cohort presenting to Maxillofacial Surgery in Newcastle upon Tyne with new, single-site lesions between December 2009 and May 2014. Patients underwent Orcellex® brush biopsy and liquid-based cytology examination in addition to conventional biopsy techniques, with management proceeding along established care pathways. Patient demographics, cytology data, most significant histopathology diagnoses and clinical outcome were all documented at the study census date (31.12.15). RESULTS A total of 170 male & 140 female patients (age range 18-91 years), exhibiting primarily leukoplakia (86.5%) at floor of mouth and ventrolateral tongue sites (44.9%), were identified. Management comprised: observation (49.7%), laser surgery (44.9%), antifungal treatment (3.5%) and Head & Neck clinic referral following cancer diagnosis (1.9%). Clinical outcomes were as follows: disease free (51.3%), persistent PMD (42.3%) and malignant transformation (6.4%). Histology and cytology diagnoses strongly correlated (r = .305). Treatment modality, lesion site, histology and cytology diagnoses were the best predictors of clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS Orcellex® brush cytology provides reliable diagnoses consistent with conventional histopathology and offers less invasive, adjunctive assessment appropriate for long-term monitoring of patients in specialist clinics.

[1]  K. Cocks,et al.  Interventional laser surgery for oral potentially malignant disorders: a longitudinal patient cohort study. , 2017, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  M. Goodson,et al.  Diagnostic Adjunctive Techniques and The Management of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders , 2015 .

[3]  T. Griffin,et al.  Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Oral Brush Biopsies Identifies Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor as a Promising, Mechanism-Based Oral Cancer Biomarker , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Sarah J. Johnson,et al.  Orcellex brush biopsy and liquid-based cytology -assessment of a new diagnostic technique in oral potentially malignant disorder management , 2014 .

[5]  P. Sloan,et al.  Clinical Outcome Following Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder Treatment: A 100 Patient Cohort Study , 2013, International journal of dentistry.

[6]  D. Messadi,et al.  Diagnostic aids for detection of oral precancerous conditions , 2013, International Journal of Oral Science.

[7]  Sarah J. Johnson,et al.  PP011: Brush versus scalpel: Consensus agreement on orcellex brush cytology versus incisional biopsy , 2013 .

[8]  Sridhar Reddy,et al.  The sensitivity and specificity of computerized brush biopsy and scalpel biopsy in diagnosing oral premalignant lesions: A comparative study , 2012, Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP.

[9]  R. Mehrotra The role of cytology in oral lesions: A review of recent improvements , 2012, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[10]  R. Mehrotra,et al.  The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions , 2011, Head & neck oncology.

[11]  P Güneri,et al.  The utility of toluidine blue staining and brush cytology as adjuncts in clinical examination of suspicious oral mucosal lesions. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[12]  Tim Rattay,et al.  Treatment and follow‐up of oral dysplasia — A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2009, Head & neck.

[13]  Isaäc van der Waal,et al.  Potentially malignant disorders of the oral and oropharyngeal mucosa; terminology, classification and present concepts of management , 2009 .

[14]  M. Goodson,et al.  Predicting recurrence after oral precancer treatment: use of cell cycle analysis. , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  M. Desai,et al.  Potential applications of oral brush cytology with liquid-based technology: results from a cohort of normal oral mucosa. , 2006, Oral oncology.

[16]  Mark Sherman,et al.  The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. , 2002, JAMA.

[17]  P. Thomson,et al.  Interventional laser surgery: an effective surgical and diagnostic tool in oral precancer management. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.