Compressed sensing in dynamic MRI

Recent theoretical advances in the field of compressive sampling—also referred to as compressed sensing (CS)—hold considerable promise for practical applications in MRI, but the fundamental condition of sparsity required in the CS framework is usually not fulfilled in MR images. However, in dynamic imaging, data sparsity can readily be introduced by applying the Fourier transformation along the temporal dimension assuming that only parts of the field‐of‐view (FOV) change at a high temporal rate while other parts remain stationary or change slowly. The second condition for CS, random sampling, can easily be realized by randomly skipping phase‐encoding lines in each dynamic frame. In this work, the feasibility of the CS framework for accelerated dynamic MRI is assessed. Simulated datasets are used to compare the reconstruction results for different reduction factors, noise, and sparsity levels. In vivo cardiac cine data and Fourier‐encoded velocity data of the carotid artery are used to test the reconstruction performance relative to k‐t broad‐use linear acquisition speed‐up technique (k‐t BLAST) reconstructions. Given sufficient data sparsity and base signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), CS is demonstrated to result in improved temporal fidelity compared to k‐t BLAST reconstructions for the example data sets used in this work. Magn Reson Med 59:365–373, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Dynamic MRI with high frame rate exploiting spatiotemporal correlations , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  G. Pohost,et al.  Block Regional Interpolation Scheme for k‐Space (BRISK): A Rapid Cardiac Imaging Technique , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Optimizing spatiotemporal sampling for k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE: Application to high‐resolution real‐time cardiac steady‐state free precession , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R Frayne,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced 3D MR angiography , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[8]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[9]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Accelerating cine phase‐contrast flow measurements using k‐t BLAST and k‐t SENSE , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  On the influence of training data quality in k‐t BLAST reconstruction , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  X Hu,et al.  Continuous Update with Random Encoding (CURE): A New Strategy for Dynamic Imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Michael Lustig,et al.  k-t SPARSE: High frame rate dynamic MRI exploiting spatio-temporal sparsity , 2006 .

[15]  N J Pelc,et al.  Unaliasing by Fourier‐encoding the overlaps using the temporal dimension (UNFOLD), applied to cardiac imaging and fMRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Sudipto Guha,et al.  Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling , 2002, STOC '02.

[17]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Accelerated dynamic Fourier velocity encoding by exploiting velocity-spatio-temporal correlations , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[18]  D. Norris,et al.  A new method of NMR flow imaging. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  P. R. Moran A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. , 1982, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  A. Rose,et al.  Vision: human and electronic , 1973 .

[21]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Jeffrey Tsao,et al.  On the UNFOLD method , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Michael Lustig,et al.  Faster Imaging with Randomly Perturbed, Undersampled Spirals and |L|_1 Reconstruction , 2004 .

[24]  J. J. van Vaals,et al.  “Keyhole” method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Shared k‐space echo planar imaging with keyhole , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  O. Haraldseth,et al.  K‐space substitution: A novel dynamic imaging technique , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  José Millet-Roig,et al.  Noquist: Reduced field‐of‐view imaging by direct Fourier inversion , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  D. Donoho,et al.  Uncertainty principles and signal recovery , 1989 .