Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems.

Evaluating and enhancing resilience in water infrastructure is a crucial step towards more sustainable urban water management. As a prerequisite to enhancing resilience, a detailed understanding is required of the inherent resilience of the underlying system. Differing from traditional risk analysis, here we propose a global resilience analysis (GRA) approach that shifts the objective from analysing multiple and unknown threats to analysing the more identifiable and measurable system responses to extreme conditions, i.e. potential failure modes. GRA aims to evaluate a system's resilience to a possible failure mode regardless of the causal threat(s) (known or unknown, external or internal). The method is applied to test the resilience of four water distribution systems (WDSs) with various features to three typical failure modes (pipe failure, excess demand, and substance intrusion). The study reveals GRA provides an overview of a water system's resilience to various failure modes. For each failure mode, it identifies the range of corresponding failure impacts and reveals extreme scenarios (e.g. the complete loss of water supply with only 5% pipe failure, or still meeting 80% of demand despite over 70% of pipes failing). GRA also reveals that increased resilience to one failure mode may decrease resilience to another and increasing system capacity may delay the system's recovery in some situations. It is also shown that selecting an appropriate level of detail for hydraulic models is of great importance in resilience analysis. The method can be used as a comprehensive diagnostic framework to evaluate a range of interventions for improving system resilience in future studies.

[1]  Luigi Berardi,et al.  Operational and Tactical Management of Water and Energy Resources in Pressurized Systems: Competition at WDSA 2014 , 2016 .

[2]  Pierre Hecq,et al.  Drinking Water Regulations , 2006 .

[3]  Min Ouyang,et al.  Vulnerability assessment and mitigation for the Chinese railway system under floods , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Guangtao Fu,et al.  Reliable, resilient and sustainable water management: the Safe & SuRe approach , 2016, Global challenges.

[5]  Michele Guidolin,et al.  Twin-Hierarchy Decomposition for Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems , 2016 .

[6]  P. Hokstad,et al.  Risk and Interdependencies in Critical Infrastructures , 2012 .

[7]  Richard Burd,et al.  BATTLE OF THE WATER CALIBRATION NETWORKS (BWCN) , 2011 .

[8]  Lufthansa Kanta,et al.  Vulnerability Assessment and Mitigation Methods for Interdependent Water Distribution and Urban Fire Response Systems , 2007 .

[9]  Emily M Zechman Agent-based modeling to simulate contamination events and evaluate threat management strategies in water distribution systems. , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Michele Guidolin,et al.  Hierarchical Decomposition of Water Distribution Systems for Background Leakage Assessment , 2014 .

[11]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Attack vulnerability of complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  J. Ahern From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world , 2011 .

[13]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Battle of the Water Networks II , 2014 .

[14]  Royce A. Francis,et al.  A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  J F Hughes,et al.  Measuring the resilience of transport infrastructure , 2014 .

[16]  Lufthansa Kanta,et al.  Vulnerability, Risk, and Mitigation Assessment of Water Distribution Systems for Insufficient Fire Flows , 2013 .

[17]  Jonas Johansson,et al.  An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Alexander J. Felson,et al.  Ecological resilience and resilient cities , 2014 .

[19]  W Rauch,et al.  Cascade vulnerability for risk analysis of water infrastructure. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Guangtao Fu,et al.  A global analysis approach for investigating structural resilience in urban drainage systems. , 2015, Water research.

[21]  Lufthansa Kanta Vulnerability assessment of water supply systems for insufficient fire flows , 2009 .

[22]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Reliability and vulnerability analyses of critical infrastructures: Comparing two approaches in the context of power systems , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Sheng Li,et al.  Effect of edge removal on topological and functional robustness of complex networks , 2008, 0809.2631.

[24]  Paul F. Boulos,et al.  Numerical Methods for Modeling Water Quality in Distribution Systems: A Comparison , 1996 .

[25]  Jonas Johansson,et al.  Risk and Vulnerability Analysis of Large-Scale Technical Infrastructures , 2007 .

[26]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Battle of the Water Calibration Networks , 2012 .

[27]  Guangtao Fu,et al.  A new approach to urban water management: Safe and sure , 2014 .

[28]  P. Boulos,et al.  Discrete Volume‐Element Method for Network Water‐Quality Models , 1993 .

[29]  Gholamreza Naser,et al.  Water distribution system reliability under simultaneous multicomponent failure scenario , 2014 .

[30]  D Butler,et al.  Clustering analysis of water distribution systems: identifying critical components and community impacts. , 2014, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[31]  Luigi Berardi,et al.  Assessing mechanical vulnerability in water distribution networks under multiple failures , 2014 .

[32]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[33]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  The Battle of the Water Sensor Networks (BWSN): A Design Challenge for Engineers and Algorithms , 2008 .

[34]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.