CT evaluation of coronary artery stents with iterative image reconstruction: improvements in image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction

AbstractObjectivesComparison of coronary artery stent assessment with cardiac CT angiography (cCTA) using traditional filtered back projection (FBP) and sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE), in both full- and half-radiation dose image data.MethodsDual-source cCTA studies of 37 implanted stents were reconstructed at full- and half-radiation dose with FBP and SAFIRE. Half-dose data were based on projections from one DSCT detector. In-stent noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and stent-lumen attenuation increase ratio (SAIR) were measured and image quality graded. Stent volumes were measured to gauge severity of beam hardening artefacts.ResultsFull-dose SAFIRE reconstructions were superior to full-dose FBP vis-à-vis in-stent noise (21.2 ± 6.6 vs. 35.7 ± 17.5; P < 0.05), SNR (22.1 ± 8.6 vs. 14.3 ± 6.7; P < 0.05), SAIR (19.6 ± 17.6 vs. 33.4 ± 20.4%; P < 0.05), and image quality (4.2 ± 0.86 vs. 3.5 ± 1.0; P < 0.05). Stent volumes were lower measured with SAFIRE (119.9 ± 53.7 vs. 129.8 ± 65.0 mm3; P > 0.05). Comparing half-dose SAFIRE with full-dose FBP, in-stent noise (26.7 ± 13.0 vs. 35.7 ± 17.5; P < 0.05) and SNR (18.2 ± 6.9 vs. 14.3 ± 6.7; P < 0.05) improved significantly. SAIR (31.6 ± 24.3 vs. 33.4 ± 20.4%; P > 0.05), stent volume (129.6 ± 57.3 vs. 129.8 ± 65.0 mm3; P > 0.05), and image quality (3.5 ± 1.0 vs. 3.7 ± 1.1; P > 0.05) did not differ. Radiation dose decreased from 8.7 ± 5.2 to 4.3 ± 2.6 mSv.ConclusionsIterative reconstruction significantly improves imaging of coronary artery stents by CT compared with FBP, even with half-radiation-dose data.Key Points• Computed tomography (CT) is becoming an increasingly important investigation for cardiac problems.• Iterative CT reconstruction techniques significantly improve coronary artery stent evaluation. • Iterative reconstruction has the potential to reduce radiation dose requirements. • Improved stent visualisation detects complications better, further reducing the need for catheterisation.

[1]  Scott D Flamm,et al.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Minghua Li,et al.  In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: shall we do it or not? , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CT. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  S. Abbara.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography , 2011 .

[6]  N. Evans,et al.  Repeat percutaneous coronary revascularization: Indications and outcomes in a “Real World” cohort , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[7]  T. Flohr,et al.  Iterative image reconstruction techniques: Applications for cardiac CT. , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[8]  Zhonghua Sun,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[9]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  NON-INVASIVE ANGIOGRAPHY Original Studies Coronary Stent Assessability by 64 Slice Multi-Detector Computed Tomography , 2007 .

[10]  M. Defrise,et al.  Iterative correction of beam hardening artifacts in CT. , 2011, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[11]  J. Min,et al.  High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[12]  Z. Pan,et al.  Evaluation of coronary artery in-stent restenosis with prospectively ECG-triggered axial CT angiography versus retrospective technique: a phantom study , 2011, La radiologia medica.

[13]  C. Fink,et al.  Evaluation of heavily calcified vessels with coronary CT angiography: comparison of iterative and filtered back projection image reconstruction. , 2011, Radiology.

[14]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Raw data-based iterative reconstruction in body CTA: evaluation of radiation dose saving potential , 2011, European Radiology.

[15]  Yun-Dai Chen,et al.  Prevalence and prognosis of coronary stent gap detected by multi-detector CT: a follow-up study , 2012, European Radiology.

[16]  J. Min,et al.  ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[17]  C. Herzog,et al.  In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  Coronary artery stent imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT using high-pitch spiral acquisition in a cardiac phantom: comparison with the sequential and low-pitch spiral mode , 2010, European Radiology.

[19]  C. Fink,et al.  Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection , 2011, European Radiology.

[20]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[21]  D. Andreini,et al.  High diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-gating 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis , 2011, European Radiology.

[22]  P M Joseph,et al.  The exponential edge-gradient effect in x-ray computed tomography. , 1981, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  N. Bellenger,et al.  A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography , 2010, Heart.

[25]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[26]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Diffuse lung disease: CT of the chest with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2010, Radiology.