Socially intelligent reasoning for autonomous agents

Socially intelligent agents are autonomous problem solvers that have to achieve their objectives by interacting with other similarly autonomous entities. A major concern, therefore, is with the design of the decision-making mechanism that such agents employ in order to determine which actions to take to achieve their goals. We propose a framework for making socially acceptable decisions, based on social welfare functions, that combines social and individual perspectives in a unified and flexible manner. The framework is realized in an exemplar computational setting and an empirical analysis is made of the relative performance of varying sociable decision-making functions in a range of environments. This analysis is then used to design an agent that adapts its decision-making to reflect the resource constraints that it faces at any given time. A further round of empirical evaluation shows how adding such a meta-level mechanism enhances the performance of the agent by directing reasoning to adopt different strategies in different contexts. Finally, the possibility and efficacy of making the metalevel mechanism adaptive, so that experience of past encounters can be factored into the decision-making, is demonstrated.

[1]  J. Harsanyi Rational behavior and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations: Frontmatter , 1977 .

[2]  Paul R. Cohen,et al.  Trial by Fire: Understanding the Design Requirements for Agents in Complex Environments , 1989, AI Mag..

[3]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Foundations of Statistics , 1955 .

[4]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[5]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Do the right thing , 1991 .

[6]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Collaborative Systems (AAAI-94 Presidential Address) , 1996 .

[7]  Cristiano Castelfranchi Social Power: A Point missed in Multi-Agent , 1990 .

[8]  B. Grosz Collaborative Systems , 1996 .

[9]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Rational Agents , 1997 .

[10]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Modeling Social Action for AI Agents , 1997, IJCAI.

[11]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Limits of economic and strategic rationality for agents and MA systems , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[12]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[13]  Sviatoslav Brainov The Role and the Impact of Preferences on Multiagent Interaction , 1999, ATAL.

[14]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Socially Responsible Decision Making by Autonomous Agents , 1999 .

[15]  Sviatoslav B. Brainov,et al.  Altruistic Cooporation Between Self-Interested Agents , 1996, ECAI.

[16]  Amedeo Cesta,et al.  Effects of Different Interaction Attitudes on a Multi-Agent System Performance , 1996, MAAMAW.

[17]  A. Michalos Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations , 1982 .

[18]  Kim P. Corfman,et al.  Mathematical models of group choice and negotiations , 1992 .

[19]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[20]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents , 1997, IEE Proc. Softw. Eng..

[21]  T. Schelling The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[22]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Doyle See Infer Choose Do Perceive Act , 2009 .

[23]  Jesús Favela,et al.  Emotional awareness in collaborative systems , 1999, 6th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval. 5th International Workshop on Groupware (Cat. No.PR00268).

[24]  A. Sen,et al.  Choice, Welfare and Measurement , 1982 .

[25]  N. R. Jennings Effects of Different Interaction Attitudes on Multi-agent System Performance. In , .

[26]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[27]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Variable Sociability in Agent-Based Decision Making , 1999, ATAL.

[28]  Stuart J. Russell Rationality and Intelligence , 1995, IJCAI.