Impact of liquid water on oxygen reaction in cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell: A simple and physically sound model

Abstract When cells work at high current density, liquid water accumulates in their catalyst layer (CL) and the gaseous oxygen could dissolve into the water and the ionomer film simultaneously; their associated dissolved concentrations in equilibrium with the gaseous oxygen are also different. Based on a CL acquired using tomography, we present new methods in this paper to derive agglomerate models for partly saturated CL by viewing the movement and reaction of the dissolved oxygen in the two liquids (water and ionomer) and the agglomerate as two independent random processes. Oxygen dissolved in the water moves differently from oxygen dissolved in the ionomer, and to make the analysis tractable, we use an average distribution function to describe the average movement of all dissolved oxygen. A formula is proposed to describe this average distribution function, which, in combination with the exponential distribution assumed in the literature for oxygen reaction, leads to a simple yet physically sound agglomerate model. The model has three parameters which can be directly calculated from CL structure rather than by calibration. We explain how to calculate these parameters under different water contents for a given CL structure, and analyse the impact of liquid water on cell performance.

[1]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  Nano-morphology of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer—imaging, reconstruction and analysis , 2011 .

[2]  M. Fesanghary,et al.  A study of the agglomerate catalyst layer for the cathode side of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Modeling and optimization , 2012 .

[3]  Chang-Soo Kim,et al.  A significant improvement of oxygen diffusion in catalyst layer based on hydrocarbon ionomer containing dimethyl silicone oil for PEM fuel cells , 2011 .

[4]  Zhigang Qi,et al.  Improvement of water management by a microporous sublayer for PEM fuel cells , 2002 .

[5]  Rui Chen,et al.  Modelling water intrusion and oxygen diffusion in a reconstructed microporous layer of PEM fuel cells , 2014 .

[6]  K. Kudo,et al.  Model for investigation of oxygen transport limitation in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2013 .

[7]  Sandip Mazumder,et al.  Generalized flooded agglomerate model for the cathode catalyst layer of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell , 2012 .

[8]  William G. Gray,et al.  General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 2. Mass, momenta, energy, and entropy equations , 1979 .

[9]  Rui Chen,et al.  A proposed agglomerate model for oxygen reduction in the catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2014 .

[10]  X.-M. Zhang,et al.  Impact of Compression on Effective Thermal Conductivity and Diffusion Coefficient of Woven Gas Diffusion Layers in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2014 .

[11]  A. Kulikovsky.  How important is Oxygen Transport in agglomerates in a PEM fuel cell catalyst layer , 2014 .

[12]  Sadik Kakac,et al.  Two‐dimensional model for proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1998 .

[13]  D. Ingham,et al.  Effective diffusivity of polymer electrolyte fuel cell gas diffusion layers: An overview and numerical study , 2015 .

[14]  M. Moein-Jahromi,et al.  Performance prediction of PEM fuel cell cathode catalyst layer using agglomerate model , 2012 .

[15]  Afzal Suleman,et al.  Multi-variable optimization of PEMFC cathodes using an agglomerate model , 2007 .

[16]  R. Schweiss,et al.  Mitigation of Water Management in PEM Fuel Cell Cathodes by Hydrophilic Wicking Microporous Layers , 2010 .

[17]  F. Weng,et al.  Experimental study of micro-porous layers for PEMFC with gradient hydrophobicity under various humidity conditions , 2011 .

[18]  Rui Chen,et al.  Reliability of the spherical agglomerate models for catalyst layer in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells , 2014 .

[19]  K. Scott,et al.  Numerical investigation of the optimal Nafion® ionomer content in cathode catalyst layer: An agglomerate two-phase flow modelling , 2014 .

[20]  Sandip Mazumder,et al.  Numerical investigation of the effect of cathode catalyst layer structure and composition on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance , 2008 .

[21]  Kyle J. Lange,et al.  Dual-Beam FIB/SEM Characterization, Statistical Reconstruction, and Pore Scale Modeling of a PEMFC Catalyst Layer , 2014 .

[22]  Marc Secanell,et al.  Characterization of the PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Microstructure by Nonlinear Least-Squares Parameter Estimation , 2012 .

[23]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Direct three-dimensional reconstruction of a nanoporous catalyst layer for a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2011 .

[24]  E. Alper,et al.  Numerical assessment of dependence of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance on cathode catalyst layer parameters , 2011 .

[25]  Ned Djilali,et al.  Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell—a parametric study , 2003 .

[26]  K. Karan,et al.  An improved two-dimensional agglomerate cathode model to study the influence of catalyst layer structural parameters , 2005 .

[27]  William G. Gray,et al.  General conservation equations for multi-phase systems: 1. Averaging procedure , 1979 .

[28]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Two-phase transport and the role of micro-porous layer in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2004 .

[29]  Ahmet Kusoglu,et al.  A Critical Review of Modeling Transport Phenomena in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells , 2014 .

[30]  I. Manke,et al.  3D Visualisation of PEMFC Electrode Structures Using FIB Nanotomography , 2010 .

[31]  Jason J. Boisvert,et al.  Understanding the Effect of Kinetic and Mass Transport Processes in Cathode Agglomerates , 2014 .

[32]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Composition and performance modelling of catalyst layer in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 1999 .

[33]  Yun Wang,et al.  A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications,and needs on fundamental research , 2011 .

[34]  R. Zengerle,et al.  Multiscale tomography of nanoporous carbon-supported noble metal catalyst layers , 2013 .

[35]  B. Sundén,et al.  Process Based Large Scale Molecular Dynamic Simulation of a Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer , 2012 .

[36]  M. Eikerling,et al.  Effects of ionomer coverage on agglomerate effectiveness in catalyst layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2014, Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry.

[37]  Xueguan Song,et al.  Numerical analysis of the optimum membrane/ionomer water content of PEMFCs: The interaction of Nafion® ionomer content and cathode relative humidity , 2015 .

[38]  Fuqiang Liu,et al.  Process based reconstruction and simulation of a three-dimensional fuel cell catalyst layer , 2010 .

[39]  Emin Caglan Kumbur,et al.  Investigation of macro- and micro-porous layer interaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2008 .

[40]  Y. Lee,et al.  Numerical analysis of catalyst agglomerates and liquid water transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2010 .

[41]  J. Benziger,et al.  Differences in Water Sorption and Proton Conductivity Between Nafion and SPEEK , 2011 .

[42]  S. Litster,et al.  Resolving the Three‐Dimensional Microstructure of Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Electrodes using Nanometer‐Scale X‐ray Computed Tomography , 2012 .

[43]  Akeel A. Shah,et al.  Transient non-isothermal model of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 2007 .

[44]  Michael Eikerling,et al.  Structure and performance of different types of agglomerates in cathode catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells , 2004 .

[45]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  Optimization of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layer with bidirectionally-graded composition , 2015 .

[46]  M. Kermani,et al.  A parametric study of cathode catalyst layer structural parameters on the performance of a PEM fuel cell , 2010 .