How Endowed versus Earned Progress Affects Consumer Goal Commitment and Motivation

Because consumers ask different questions to establish commitment at beginning versus advanced stages of goal pursuit, we propose that progress that they attribute to themselves and to the situation will have a distinctive impact on motivation, depending on their relative position in goal pursuit. When progress on achieving a goal is low, people are concerned about its attainability. Because attributing low progress to self (vs. to the situation) signals a higher difficulty of goal attainment, it leads to lower goal commitment and, subsequently, decreased motivation. Conversely, when progress on achieving the goal is high and attainment of the goal is relatively secured, people are more concerned about the value of the goal. Because attributing a high progress to self (vs. to the situation) signals a greater value of the goal, it should lead to greater goal commitment and, subsequently, higher motivation.

[1]  D. Bem.  Self-Perception Theory , 1972 .

[2]  Minjung Koo,et al.  Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  P. Gollwitzer.  Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. , 1999 .

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudes toward objects as predictors of sin-gle and multiple behavioral criteria , 1974 .

[5]  N. Liberman,et al.  Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effect. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  The theory of cognitive dissonance: The evolution and vicissitudes of an idea. , 1997 .

[7]  Mengze Shi,et al.  Virtual Progress: The Effect of Path Characteristics on Perceptions of Progress and Choice , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Expectancy, value and psychological distance: A new look at goal gradients , 2008 .

[9]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[10]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[11]  N. Miller,et al.  Displacement and conflict; learnable drive as a basis for the steeper gradient of avoidance than of approach. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  K. Lewin,et al.  A Dynamic Theory of Personality , 1936 .

[13]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Response Modeling with Nonrandom Marketing-Mix Variables , 2004 .

[14]  E. Higgins,et al.  Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[16]  M. Uncles,et al.  Patterns of Buyer Behavior: Regularities, Models, and Extensions , 1995 .

[17]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[18]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  A theory of goal systems. , 2002 .

[19]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[20]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[21]  J. S. Brown,et al.  Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort , 2006 .

[23]  A. K. Basu.  A Theory of Decision-Making , 1973, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[24]  John A Bargh,et al.  Liking is for doing: the effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  E. Tolman.  Principles of performance. , 1955, Psychological review.

[26]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Preference for Consistency: The Development of a Valid Measure and the Discovery of Surprising Behavioral Implications , 1995 .

[27]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[28]  Nancy K. Innis.  Tolman, Edward C. , 2006 .

[29]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[30]  C. L. Hull.  The goal-gradient hypothesis and maze learning. , 1932 .

[31]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Goal Effects on Action and Cognition , 1996 .

[32]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  When Thinking Beats Doing: The Role of Optimistic Expectations in Goal-Based Choice , 2007 .

[33]  Ran Kivetz,et al.  The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention , 2006 .

[34]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice , 2005 .

[35]  E. Higgins,et al.  Expectancy × Value Effects: Regulatory Focus as Determinant of Magnitude and Direction , 1997 .

[36]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals , 2005 .

[37]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .