A Multivariate Method of Classif in Bod Form Variation for Sizing Women's Apparel

The purpose of this study was to develop a multivariate method for structuring a sizing system for women's apparel. The I 977 suvey of U.S. Army women was the data base. The sample was limited to 1217 subjects who were White or Black and 17-3 5 years old. The methodology underlying PS 42-70, the current U.S. sizing standard, was studied relative to recent changes in body form classification, apparel production, and merchandising which support development of multivariate methodology. Examination of PS 42-70 as a classification system for the sample showed inadequate proportioning of overall body dimensions, particularlyshoulder breadth and body segment lengths. The experimental method used components 1 and 2 to summarize body form variation as the relationship between body thickness and length. A Principal Component Sizing System (PCSS) was constructed by partitioning the distribution of principal components 1 by 2 into 26 sizes. A per subject comparison of "goodness of fit" of PS 42-70 and PCSS showed PCSS consistently closer to subjecfs' overall body proportions than PS 42-70. The multivariate relationship between body thickness and length is fundamental to body form and size variation. Our results indicate that PCSS better represents that relationship for the sample studied.

[1]  S G Vandenberg.  A factor analysis of garment measures of Dutch women. , 1968, Human biology.

[2]  J. Carter,et al.  A modified somatotype method. , 1967, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The varieties of human physique. , 1940 .

[4]  Juan Comas,et al.  Manual of physical anthropology , 1960 .

[5]  J. B. Moore,et al.  Body Characteristics in Relation to Life Adjustment, Body-Image and Attitudes of College Females , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  C J Kowalski,et al.  Commentary on the Use of Multivariate Statistical Methods in Ant H Ropomet Ric Research the Other Side of the Story , 2022 .

[7]  F. LATHAM.  Anthropometry and Human Engineering , 1956, Nature.

[8]  Marilyn R DeLong,et al.  Weight Loss and the Resulting Fit and Size Change of Ready‐ to‐Wear for American Women , 1979 .

[9]  Robert M. White.  Anthropometry of Women of the U.S. Army , 1977 .

[10]  Vandenberg Sg.  A factor analysis of garment measures of Dutch women. , 1968 .

[11]  J BROZEK,et al.  Subcutaneous fat and age changes in body build and body form in women. , 1953, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  J. E. Croney.  An Anthropometric Study of Young Women Fashion Students Including a Factor Analysis of Body Measurements , 1977 .

[13]  C. A. Patterson,et al.  Selected Body Measurements of Women Aged Sixty-five and Older , 1983 .

[14]  H.C.W. Stockbridge.  Towards metric sizing: Wilfred Rodwell. Clothing Institute Journal 1968. 58 pages. 50p , 1971 .

[15]  M H Crawford,et al.  Human biology in Tlaxcala, Mexico: demography. , 1972, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  Marjorie Deane,et al.  Women's Measurements and Sizes. , 1958 .