Assessing the impact of choosing different deformable registration algorithms on cone-beam CT enhancement by histogram matching

BackgroundThe aim of this work is to assess the impact of using different deformable registration (DR) algorithms on the quality of cone-beam CT (CBCT) correction with histogram matching (HM).Methods and materialsData sets containing planning CT (pCT) and CBCT images for ten patients with prostate cancer were used. Each pCT image was registered to its corresponding CBCT image using one rigid registration algorithm with mutual information similarity metric (RR-MI) and three DR algorithms with normalized correlation coefficient, mutual information and normalized mutual information (DR-NCC, DR-MI and DR-NMI, respectively). Then, the HM was performed between deformed pCT and CBCT in order to correct the distribution of the Hounsfield Units (HU) in CBCT images.ResultsThe visual assessment showed that the absolute difference between corrected CBCT and deformed pCT was reduced after correction with HM except for soft tissue-air and soft-tissue-bone interfaces due to the improper registration. Furthermore, volumes comparison in terms of average HU error showed that using DR-NCC algorithm with HM yielded the lowest error values of about 55.95 ± 10.43 HU compared to DR-MI and DR-NMI for which the errors were 58.60 ± 10.35 and 56.58 ± 10.51 HU, respectively. Tissue class’s comparison by the mean absolute error (MAE) plots confirmed the performance of DR-NCC algorithm to produce corrected CBCT images with lowest values of MAE even in regions where the misalignment is more pronounced. It was also found that the used method had successfully improved the spatial uniformity in the CBCT images by reducing the root mean squared difference (RMSD) between the pCT and CBCT in fat and muscle from 57 and 25 HU to 8HU, respectively.ConclusionThe choice of an accurate DR algorithm before performing the HM leads to an accurate correction of CBCT images. The results suggest that applying DR process based on NCC similarity metric reduces significantly the uncertainties in CBCT images and generates images in good agreement with pCT.

[1]  J Castelli,et al.  [Adaptive radiotherapy in routine use? State of the art: The medical physicist's point of view]. , 2015, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[2]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Magnitude and clinical relevance of translational and rotational patient setup errors: a cone-beam CT study. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Characterization of scattered radiation in kV CBCT images using Monte Carlo simulations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[5]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation , 2008, Radiation oncology.

[6]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  N. Kadoya,et al.  Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Star-Lack,et al.  Improved scatter correction using adaptive scatter kernel superposition , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  H Saint-Jalmes,et al.  Zero echo time MRI-only treatment planning for radiation therapy of brain tumors after resection. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  John Wong,et al.  Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[13]  Milan Sonka,et al.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  S Webb,et al.  An efficient Monte Carlo-based algorithm for scatter correction in keV cone-beam CT , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  J. Castelli,et al.  Radiothérapie adaptative en routine ? État de l’art : point de vue du physicien médical , 2015 .

[16]  E. Bezak,et al.  Technological approaches to in-room CBCT imaging , 2008, Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols. , 2010, Medical physics.

[18]  S Webb,et al.  Removal and effects of scatter-glare in cone-beam CT with an amorphous-silicon flat-panel detector , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Ernesto Mainegra-Hing,et al.  Hounsfield unit recovery in clinical cone beam CT images of the thorax acquired for image guided radiation therapy , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Scatter correction for cone-beam CT in radiation therapy. , 2009 .

[21]  Guy Amit,et al.  Automated planning of breast radiotherapy using cone beam CT imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[22]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Online planning and delivery technique for radiotherapy of spinal metastases using cone-beam CT: image quality and system performance. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: A model for on-line application. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  Turki Almatani,et al.  Automated algorithm for CBCT-based dose calculations of prostate radiotherapy with bilateral hip prostheses. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  Lei Xing,et al.  Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam CT (CBCT)-based dose calculation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Markus Stock,et al.  Feasibility of CBCT-based dose calculation: comparative analysis of HU adjustment techniques. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  Steve Webb,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography number errors and consequences for radiotherapy planning: an investigation of correction methods. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Friedlieb Lorenz,et al.  A new strategy for online adaptive prostate radiotherapy based on cone-beam CT. , 2009, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[30]  Ben Heijmen,et al.  Correction of conebeam CT values using a planning CT for derivation of the "dose of the day". , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  Kanabu Nawa,et al.  Cone Beam Computed Tomography Image Quality Improvement Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network , 2018, Cureus.