Understanding Value-Added Resellers' Assortments of Multi-Component Systems

Inter-connect standards increase choices; e.g., in cardiac pacemakers, the IS-1 standard enables the “pulse generator” from six manufacturers to be combined with the “lead set” from the other five to add up to thirty additional mixed-brand pacemakers. However, observed assortment additions are much smaller, which poses a puzzle since manufacturers in extant models welcome such additions to reduce price competition and increase variety. Instead, conflict with the value-added resellers (VARs) who create, and carry these additions is commonplace. We extend the literature with our analytical model that shows VARs limit the number and composition of additions to gain better upstream terms. This conflict is exacerbated when “keystone” components are relatively more decisive in influencing customer choices, so their exclusion from an addition represents a larger loss. Our empirical study of the multi-billion dollar auto paint refinish market finds assortment additions consistent with our predictions. We conclude with discussing the role of channel support programs to ameliorate these conflicts.

[1]  Anne T. Coughlan,et al.  Distribution channel choice in a market with complementary goods , 1987 .

[2]  Paul R. Messinger,et al.  Multicomponent Systems Pricing: Rational Inattention and Downward Rigidities , 2012 .

[3]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels , 1988 .

[4]  Nicholas Economides,et al.  Desirability of Compatibility in the Absence of Network Externalities , 1989 .

[5]  B. Douglas Bernheim,et al.  Common marketing agency as a device for facilitating collusion , 1985 .

[6]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[7]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[8]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction , 1998 .

[9]  Jeffrey P. Dotson,et al.  The Impact of Category Captainship on the Breadth and Appeal of a Retailer's Assortment , 2014 .

[10]  Peter Boatwright,et al.  Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach , 2001 .

[11]  Sridhar Moorthy,et al.  A General Theory of Pass-Through in Channels with Category Management and Retail Competition , 2005 .

[12]  Shantanu Dutta,et al.  Customizing Complex Products: When Should the Vendor Take Control? , 2006 .

[13]  Garrett J. van Ryzin,et al.  Stocking Retail Assortments Under Dynamic Consumer Substitution , 2001, Oper. Res..

[14]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Unbundling of Industrial Systems , 1990 .

[15]  P. Regibeau,et al.  Mix and Match: Product Compatibility Without Network Externalities , 2011 .

[16]  Sean X. Zhou,et al.  Exclusive Channels and Revenue Sharing in a Complementary Goods Market , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Lingxiu Dong,et al.  Product Line Pricing in a Supply Chain , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[18]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[19]  P. Regibeau,et al.  Standardization Across Markets and Entry , 2015 .

[20]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[21]  Pierre Regibeau,et al.  Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly , 1992 .