Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ( CML ) in 2015

Few neoplastic diseases have undergone a transformation in a relatively short period of time like chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has in the last few years. In 1960, CML was the first cancer where a unique chromosomal abnormality, “a minute chromosome”,1 was identified and a pathophysiologic correlation suggested. Landmark work followed, recognizing the underlying translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that gave rise to this abnormality2 and shortly afterward, the specific genes involved3,4 and the pathophysiologic implications of this novel rearrangement.5–7 Fast-forward a few years, this knowledge has given us the most remarkable example of a specific therapy targeting the dysregulated kinase activity represented by this molecular change. The broad use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has resulted in an improvement in the overall survival to the point where the life expectancy of patients today is nearly equal to that of the general population.8 Still, there are challenges and unanswered questions that define the reasons why the progress still escapes many patients, and the details that separate patients from ultimate “cure”. In this manuscript we review our current understanding of CML in 2015, present recommendations for optimal management, and discuss the unanswered questions and what could be done to answer them in the near future. Pathology, diagnostic criteria and clinical presentation of patients with CML

[1]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Long‐term efficacy and safety of bosutinib in patients with advanced leukemia following resistance/intolerance to imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2015, American journal of hematology.

[2]  M. Konopleva,et al.  Relative survival in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor era: analysis of patient data from six prospective clinical trials. , 2015, The Lancet. Haematology.

[3]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Long-term molecular and cytogenetic response and survival outcomes with imatinib 400 mg, imatinib 800 mg, dasatinib, and nilotinib in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia: retrospective analysis of patient data from five clinical trials. , 2015, The Lancet. Haematology.

[4]  T. Clackson,et al.  Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) , 2014 .

[5]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Early Disease Relapse after Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Discontinuation in CML Is Related Both to Low Number and Impaired Function of NK-Cells , 2014 .

[6]  I. Flinn,et al.  Ponatinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with the T315I Mutation: Long-Term Follow-up of Phase 1 and Phase 2 (PACE) Trials , 2014 .

[7]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Bosutinib As Third-Line Therapy in Patients (Pts) with Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP CML) Following Failure with Imatinib Plus Dasatinib and/or Nilotinib: 48-Month Update of a Phase 1/2 Study , 2014 .

[8]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Patient-driven discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: single institution experience , 2014, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[9]  Nicola D. Roberts,et al.  Prognosis for patients with CML and >10% BCR-ABL1 after 3 months of imatinib depends on the rate of BCR-ABL1 decline. , 2014, Blood.

[10]  R. Larson,et al.  ENESTnd 5-year (y) update: Long-term outcomes of patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with frontline nilotinib (NIL) versus imatinib (IM). , 2014 .

[11]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study. , 2014, Blood.

[12]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase. , 2014, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[13]  R. Larson,et al.  Early molecular response predicts outcomes in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with frontline nilotinib or imatinib. , 2014, Blood.

[14]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  HCVAD plus imatinib or dasatinib in lymphoid blastic phase chronic myeloid leukemia , 2014, Cancer.

[15]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Early response with dasatinib or imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: 3-year follow-up from a randomized phase 3 trial (DASISION). , 2014, Blood.

[16]  P. Rousselot,et al.  Preliminary Report Of The STIM2 Study: A Multicenter Stop Imatinib Trial For Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia De Novo Patients On Imatinib , 2013 .

[17]  T. Clackson,et al.  A phase 2 trial of ponatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Assessment at 6 months may be warranted for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia with no major cytogenetic response at 3 months , 2013, Haematologica.

[19]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. , 2013, Blood.

[20]  J. Melo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study. , 2013, Blood.

[21]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Early responses predict better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: results with four tyrosine kinase inhibitor modalities. , 2013, Blood.

[22]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate for chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to or intolerant of tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2013, American journal of hematology.

[23]  J. Radich,et al.  Nilotinib in imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: 48-month follow-up results of a phase II study , 2013, Leukemia.

[24]  I. Flinn,et al.  Ponatinib in refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemias. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  N. Cross,et al.  Standardized definitions of molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2012, Leukemia.

[26]  J. Cayuela,et al.  First-line imatinib mesylate in patients with newly diagnosed accelerated phase-chronic myeloid leukemia , 2012, Leukemia.

[27]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate after TKI failure in patients with chronic-phase CML with T315I mutation. , 2012, Blood.

[28]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the BELA trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience. , 2012, Blood.

[30]  Dong-Wook Kim,et al.  BCR-ABL1 doubling times more reliably assess the dynamics of CML relapse compared with the BCR-ABL1 fold rise: implications for monitoring and management. , 2012, Blood.

[31]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Bosutinib is active in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib and dasatinib and/or nilotinib therapy failure. , 2012, Blood.

[32]  Katayoun Rezvani,et al.  Assessment of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels at 3 months is the only requirement for predicting outcome for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Front-line therapy with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: what is the optimal response? , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Arnon Nagler,et al.  Combination of pegylated IFN-α2b with imatinib increases molecular response rates in patients with low- or intermediate-risk chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Blood.

[35]  Simona Soverini,et al.  BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of European LeukemiaNet. , 2011, Blood.

[36]  J. Hasford,et al.  Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. , 2011, Blood.

[37]  D. Marin,et al.  Exploring chronic myeloid leukemia patients' reasons for not adhering to the oral anticancer drug imatinib as prescribed. , 2011, Leukemia research.

[38]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Practical advice for determining the role of BCR‐ABL mutations in guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2011, Cancer.

[39]  Stefan W Krause,et al.  Tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg/d versus 400 mg/d versus 400 mg/d plus interferon-α in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  Ya-Zhen Qin,et al.  Imatinib mesylate versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the accelerated phase. , 2011, Blood.

[41]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Predictive factors for outcome and response in patients treated with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib failure. , 2011, Blood.

[42]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Immune modulation of minimal residual disease in early chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia , 2011, Cancer.

[43]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  The achievement of an early complete cytogenetic response is a major determinant for outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. , 2010, Blood.

[44]  Claude Preudhomme,et al.  Imatinib plus peginterferon alfa-2a in chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). , 2010, Blood.

[46]  Philippe Rousselot,et al.  Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[47]  Paul Metcalfe,et al.  Establishment of the first World Health Organization International Genetic Reference Panel for quantitation of BCR-ABL mRNA. , 2010, Blood.

[48]  P. Manley,et al.  Functional activity of the OCT-1 protein is predictive of long-term outcome in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  D. Marin,et al.  Early prediction of success or failure of treatment with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia , 2010, Haematologica.

[50]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Results of dasatinib therapy in patients with early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[51]  Susan O'Brien,et al.  Nilotinib as front-line treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[52]  M. Gordon Dasatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Accelerated Phase After Imatinib Failure: The START A Trial , 2010 .

[53]  C. Carcassi,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective comparison of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromosome banding analysis for the definition of complete cytogenetic response: a study of the GIMEMA CML WP. , 2009, Blood.

[54]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Nilotinib for the frontline treatment of Ph(+) chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[55]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Significance of increasing levels of minimal residual disease in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in complete cytogenetic response. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[56]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard-dose imatinib therapy. , 2009, Blood.

[57]  Deborah L White,et al.  Impact of early dose intensity on cytogenetic and molecular responses in chronic- phase CML patients receiving 600 mg/day of imatinib as initial therapy. , 2008, Blood.

[58]  M. Pirmohamed,et al.  Effective dasatinib uptake may occur without human organic cation transporter 1 (hOCT1): implications for the treatment of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Blood.

[59]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Desirable performance characteristics for BCR-ABL measurement on an international reporting scale to allow consistent interpretation of individual patient response and comparison of response rates between clinical trials. , 2008, Blood.

[60]  J. Bajpai Dasatinib or High-dose Imatinib for Chronic-phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia After Failure of First-line Imatinib: a Randomized Phase 2 Trial , 2008 .

[61]  J. Radich,et al.  Nilotinib (formerly AMN107), a highly selective BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in patients with imatinib-resistant or -intolerant accelerated-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2008, Blood.

[62]  T. Brümmendorf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of dasatinib in imatinib-resistant or -intolerant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in blast phase , 2008, Leukemia.

[63]  M. Deininger,et al.  Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations, drug resistance, and the road to a cure for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Blood.

[64]  Suzanne Kamel-Reid,et al.  Inter-laboratory comparison of chronic myeloid leukemia minimal residual disease monitoring: summary and recommendations. , 2007, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[65]  Martin C. Müller,et al.  Imatinib combined with mitoxantrone/etoposide and cytarabine is an effective induction therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast crisis , 2007, Cancer.

[66]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Outcome of patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive chronic myelogenous leukemia post‐imatinib mesylate failure , 2007, Cancer.

[67]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  A pilot study of imatinib, low-dose cytarabine and idarubicin for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase , 2007, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[68]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome negative metaphases appearing during imatinib mesylate therapy in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase. , 2005, Blood.

[69]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Contribution of ABL Kinase Domain Mutations to Imatinib Resistance in Different Subsets of Philadelphia-Positive Patients: By the GIMEMA Working Party on Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[70]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Myelodysplastic syndromes and acute leukemia developing after imatinib mesylate therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2006, Blood.

[71]  P. Manley,et al.  OCT-1-mediated influx is a key determinant of the intracellular uptake of imatinib but not nilotinib (AMN107): reduced OCT-1 activity is the cause of low in vitro sensitivity to imatinib. , 2006, Blood.

[72]  Simona Soverini,et al.  Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. , 2006, Blood.

[73]  J. Radich,et al.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2004, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[74]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  High-dose imatinib mesylate therapy in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2004, Blood.

[75]  B. Dörken,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and cellular uptake of imatinib and its main metabolite CGP74588 , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[76]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome‐negative metaphases appearing during imatinib mesylate therapy in patients with Philadelphia chromosome‐positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase , 2003, Cancer.

[77]  Susan Branford,et al.  Frequency of major molecular responses to imatinib or interferon alfa plus cytarabine in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[78]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND THERAPEUTIC TRIALS Result of high-dose imatinib mesylate in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive chronic myeloid leukemia after failure of interferon-� , 2022 .

[79]  J. Richardson,et al.  The CNS is a sanctuary for leukemic cells in mice receiving imatinib mesylate for Bcr/Abl-induced leukemia. , 2003, Blood.

[80]  D. Niederwieser,et al.  High levels of BAX, low levels of MRP-1, and high platelets are independent predictors of response to imatinib in myeloid blast crisis of CML. , 2003, Blood.

[81]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[82]  N. Donato,et al.  BCR-ABL independence and LYN kinase overexpression in chronic myelogenous leukemia cells selected for resistance to STI571. , 2003, Blood.

[83]  J. Melo,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[84]  B. Druker,et al.  The impact of clonal evolution on response to imatinib mesylate (STI571) in accelerated phase CML. , 2002, Blood.

[85]  R. Larson,et al.  Imatinib induces hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis: results of a phase II study. , 2002, Blood.

[86]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Imatinib mesylate (STI571) therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase. , 2002, Blood.

[87]  S. Sacchi,et al.  Chronic myelogenous leukemia in nonlymphoid blastic phase , 1999, Cancer.

[88]  Z. Estrov,et al.  The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[89]  J. Hasford,et al.  A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa. Writing Committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[90]  J Hermans,et al.  Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation. Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. , 1998, Lancet.

[91]  J. Goldman,et al.  Clinical features at diagnosis in 430 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia seen at a referral centre over a 16‐year period , 1997, British journal of haematology.

[92]  H. Deeg,et al.  Marrow transplantation for patients in accelerated phase of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1994, Blood.

[93]  A. Rimm,et al.  Identical-Twin Bone Marrow Transplants for Leukemia , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[94]  A. Nademanee,et al.  Fractionated total-body irradiation and high-dose etoposide as a preparatory regimen for bone marrow transplantation for 94 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. , 1994, Blood.

[95]  J. Melo,et al.  P190BCR-ABL chronic myeloid leukaemia: the missing link with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia? , 1994, Leukemia.

[96]  J. Szer,et al.  Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation after preparation with BuCy2. , 1992, Blood.

[97]  O. Witte,et al.  Tyrosine kinase activity and transformation potency of bcr-abl oncogene products. , 1990, Science.

[98]  G. Daley,et al.  Induction of chronic myelogenous leukemia in mice by the P210bcr/abl gene of the Philadelphia chromosome. , 1990, Science.

[99]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Proposal for a simple synthesis prognostic staging system in chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 1990, The American journal of medicine.

[100]  P. White,et al.  Clinical presentation and natural history of patients with essential thrombocythemia and the Philadelphia chromosome , 1988, American journal of hematology.

[101]  D. Arthur,et al.  Therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[102]  R. Marcus,et al.  Bone marrow transplantation for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[103]  E. Canaani,et al.  Fused transcript of abl and bcr genes in chronic myelogenous leukaemia , 1985, Nature.

[104]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Prognostic discrimination in "good-risk" chronic granulocytic leukemia , 1984 .

[105]  E. Canaani,et al.  ALTERED TRANSCRIPTION OF AN ONCOGENE IN CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA , 1984, The Lancet.

[106]  J. Stephenson,et al.  Philadelphia chromosomal breakpoints are clustered within a limited region, bcr, on chromosome 22 , 1984, Cell.

[107]  J. Stephenson,et al.  A cellular oncogene is translocated to the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myelocytic leukaemia , 1982, Nature.

[108]  J. Rowley A New Consistent Chromosomal Abnormality in Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia identified by Quinacrine Fluorescence and Giemsa Staining , 1973, Nature.