Impact of digital technology usage on firm resilience: a dynamic capability perspective

Purpose While the usage of digital technology can bring many operational improvements for firms, it is unclear whether it can effectively improve firm resilience to deal with supply chain disruptions caused by emergencies such as COVID-19. From a dynamic capability perspective, this study aims to investigate how digital technology usage can improve firm resilience in a rapidly changing and turbulent environment. Design/methodology/approach Based on the survey sample of 237 Chinese firms, the stepwise regression approach was used to examine the proposed research hypotheses. Findings The empirical evidence shows that digital technology usage has a U-shaped effect on firm resilience, and that effect is fully achieved by first affecting market acuity and then promoting resource reconfiguration. Moreover, the authors further found that the U-shaped association between digital technology usage and firm resilience is derived from the U-shaped association between digital technology usage and market acuity. Originality/value This study enriches the resilience literature by revealing the mechanism of digital technology usage’s effects rather than focusing on the role of specific digital technologies. This study also provides guidance for firms to develop effective digital technology usage strategies.

[1]  Fei Ye,et al.  Digital investment and environmental performance: The mediating roles of production efficiency and green innovation , 2023, International Journal of Production Economics.

[2]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  Unraveling the Performance Puzzle of Digitalization: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  N. Turner,et al.  The role of cognitive capital in supply chain resilience: an investigation during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[4]  Lujie Chen,et al.  Digital technology deployment and firm resilience: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Industrial Marketing Management.

[5]  Ismail Golgeci,et al.  Achieving resilience through knowledge management practices and risk management culture in agri-food supply chains , 2021, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal.

[6]  K. Lai,et al.  Digital supply chain management in the COVID-19 crisis: An asset orchestration perspective , 2021, International Journal of Production Economics.

[7]  Sogand Hasanzadeh,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis in the Feasibility Process of Projects: A Structural Evaluation of the Power-Oriented Relationship , 2021 .

[8]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance , 2021, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Md. Abdul Moktadir,et al.  COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review , 2021, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review.

[10]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Towards the next generation of manufacturing: implications of big data and digitalization in the context of industry 4.0 , 2021, Production Planning & Control.

[11]  L. Penco,et al.  Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective , 2021 .

[12]  M. Bevilacqua,et al.  The impact of Operations and IT-related Industry 4.0 key technologies on organizational resilience , 2021, Production Planning & Control.

[13]  Thijs Broekhuizen,et al.  Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda , 2021, Journal of Business Research.

[14]  Ming-Yu Liu,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of supply chain risk management capabilities: an investigation in the post-coronavirus crisis , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[15]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics: The role of organizational inertia , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Petra A. Nylund,et al.  Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives? , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[17]  Sachin S. Kamble,et al.  Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[18]  L. Iacovone,et al.  Unmasking the Impact of COVID-19 on Businesses : Firm Level Evidence from across the World , 2020 .

[19]  Fahham Hasan Qaiser,et al.  The impact of Industry 4.0 on the reconciliation of dynamic capabilities: evidence from the European manufacturing industries , 2020, Production Planning & Control.

[20]  Sandeep Goyal,et al.  Does the source of external knowledge matter? Examining the role of customer co-creation and partner sourcing in knowledge creation and innovation , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[21]  D. Teece,et al.  Market sensing, dynamic capability, and competitive dynamics , 2020 .

[22]  Tero Rantala,et al.  Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies , 2020 .

[23]  D. Ketchen,et al.  Research at the Intersection of Entrepreneurship, Supply Chain Management, and Strategic Management: Opportunities Highlighted by COVID-19 , 2020 .

[24]  Amalesh Sharma,et al.  Covid-19′s impact on supply chain decisions: Strategic insights from NASDAQ 100 firms using Twitter data , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[25]  van Hoek Remko Research opportunities for a more resilient post-COVID-19 supply chain – closing the gap between research findings and industry practice , 2020 .

[26]  Yonggui Wang,et al.  Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[27]  D. Ivanov Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0 , 2020, Production Planning & Control.

[29]  Divesh Ojha,et al.  Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test , 2020 .

[30]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Technological catching up and innovation policies in China: What is behind this largely successful story? , 2020 .

[31]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss? , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[32]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Exploring the relationship between big data analytics capability and competitive performance: The mediating roles of dynamic and operational capabilities , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Patrick Mikalef,et al.  Using business analytics to enhance dynamic capabilities in operations research: A case analysis and research agenda , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[35]  V. Kumar,et al.  How legacy firms can embrace the digital ecosystem via digital customer orientation , 2020 .

[36]  Javier Cenamor,et al.  How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[37]  Gregory Vial,et al.  Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Lucas Santos Dalenogare,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[39]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[40]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Antecedents of Resilient Supply Chains: An Empirical Study , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[41]  K. Voigt,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared: How SMEs approach business model innovations in Industry 4.0 , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[42]  Alexandre Dolgui,et al.  The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[43]  M. O'Sullivan,et al.  Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[44]  Marlene Amorim,et al.  Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research , 2018, WorldCIST.

[45]  R. Bhamra,et al.  Building Organizational Resilience: Four Configurations , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[46]  Hamieda Parker,et al.  The role of resilience capabilities in shaping how firms respond to disruptions , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[47]  Chang E. Koh,et al.  Information technology capability and firm performance: Role of industry , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[48]  Scott B. Friend,et al.  Big Data Facilitation, Utilization, and Monetization: Exploring the 3Vs in a New Product Development Process , 2017 .

[49]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability , 2017 .

[50]  J. Li,et al.  Product co-development in an emerging market: the role of buyer-supplier compatibility and institutional environment , 2016 .

[51]  M. Reichenbach,et al.  Sustainable , 2014, ATZ worldwide.

[52]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining the role of information technology in cultivating firms' dynamic marketing capabilities , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[53]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[54]  Xinlin Tang,et al.  An investigation into the role of IT integration, relationship predictability and routinization in interfirm relationships: From the structuration perspective , 2012 .

[55]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  V. Naidoo Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation, marketing innovation and business strategy , 2010 .

[57]  Ying Yang,et al.  Postponement in supply chain risk management: a complexity perspective , 2010 .

[58]  K. Zhou,et al.  How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies , 2010 .

[59]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value , 2009 .

[60]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks , 2008 .

[61]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[62]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[63]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  B2B seller competence: Construct development and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens , 2007 .

[64]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[65]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[66]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[67]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[68]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[69]  Ajay Kumar,et al.  A Supply Chain Resilience Capability Framework and Process for Mitigating the COVID-19 Pandemic Disruption , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[70]  Dongmei Cao,et al.  Organizational mindfulness towards digital transformation as a prerequisite of information processing capability to achieve market agility , 2021 .

[71]  Dmitry Ivanov,et al.  Digital Supply Chain Management and Technology to Enhance Resilience by Building and Using End-to-End Visibility During the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[72]  H. Gupta,et al.  Critical Factors of Digital Supply Chains for Organizational Performance Improvement , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[73]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Information System Resilience to Cope With Supply Chain Disruption , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[74]  Daniel W. E. Hein,et al.  From Digital Business Strategy to Market Performance: Insights into Key Concepts and Processes , 2017, ICIS.

[75]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  Big data analytics and firm performance: Effects of dynamic capabilities , 2017 .

[76]  Scott J. Grawe,et al.  Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination , 2015 .

[77]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Hummel's Digital Transformation Toward Omnichannel Retailing: Key Lessons Learned , 2015, MIS Q. Executive.

[78]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Disaster immunity and performance of service firms: The influence of market acuity and supply network partnering , 2014 .

[79]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[80]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.