The role of the Sheffield model on the minimum unit pricing of alcohol debate: the importance of a rhetorical perspective

The minimum unit pricing (MUP) alcohol policy debate has been informed by the Sheffield model, a study which predicts impacts of different alcohol pricing policies. This paper explores the Sheffield model’s influences on the policy debate by drawing on 36 semi-structured interviews with policy actors who were involved in the policy debate. Although commissioned by policy makers, the model’s influence has been far broader than suggested by views of ‘rational’ policy making. While findings from the Sheffield model have been used in instrumental ways, they have arguably been more important in helping debate competing values underpinning policy goals.

[1]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? Comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews , 2014, Drugs.

[2]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Changing Policy Framing as a Deliberate Strategy for Public Health Advocacy: A Qualitative Policy Case Study of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol , 2014, The Milbank quarterly.

[3]  Alan Brennan,et al.  Effects of minimum unit pricing for alcohol on different income and socioeconomic groups: a modelling study , 2014, The Lancet.

[4]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol in Scotland , 2014 .

[5]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Understanding the Development of Minimum Unit Pricing of Alcohol in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of the Policy Process , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Implications for alcohol minimum unit pricing advocacy: What can we learn for public health from UK newsprint coverage of key claim-makers in the policy debate? , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[7]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Harms to ‘others’ from alcohol consumption in the minimum unit pricing policy debate: a qualitative content analysis of UK newspapers (2005–12) , 2014, Addiction.

[8]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Perspectives on econometric modelling to inform policy: a UK qualitative case study of minimum unit pricing of alcohol , 2013, European journal of public health.

[9]  B. Hawkins,et al.  ‘Whisky gloss’: The alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland , 2013 .

[10]  J. Mccambridge,et al.  Industry Use of Evidence to Influence Alcohol Policy: A Case Study of Submissions to the 2008 Scottish Government Consultation , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[11]  B. Hawkins,et al.  Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market , 2013 .

[12]  A. Husseini,et al.  Use of evidence to support healthy public policy: a policy effectiveness-feasibility loop. , 2012, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[13]  C. Drummond,et al.  The price of a drink: the potential of alcohol minimum unit pricing as a public health measure in the UK , 2012, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[14]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Introducing a minimum unit price for alcohol in Scotland: considerations under European Law and the implications for European public health. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[15]  J. Mccambridge,et al.  Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: A qualitative study , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[16]  S. Chapman,et al.  Identifying Trustworthy Experts: How Do Policymakers Find and Assess Public Health Researchers Worth Consulting or Collaborating With? , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  S. Macintyre.  Evidence in the development of health policy. , 2012, Public health.

[18]  Simon Chapman,et al.  Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers. , 2011, The Milbank quarterly.

[19]  Martin Higgins,et al.  How evidence based is English public health policy? , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  J. Gill,et al.  The price of a drink: levels of consumption and price paid per unit of alcohol by Edinburgh's ill drinkers with a comparison to wider alcohol sales in Scotland , 2011, Addiction.

[21]  Chris Naylor,et al.  Reducing health inequalities in priority public health conditions: using rapid review to develop proposals for evidence-based policy. , 2010, Journal of public health.

[22]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. , 2010, The Milbank quarterly.

[23]  A. Brennan,et al.  Estimated effect of alcohol pricing policies on health and health economic outcomes in England: an epidemiological model , 2010, The Lancet.

[24]  A. Brennan,et al.  Policy options for alcohol price regulation: the importance of modelling population heterogeneity. , 2010, Addiction.

[25]  Adalsteinn D. Brown,et al.  Research and advice giving: a functional view of evidence-informed policy advice in a Canadian Ministry of Health. , 2009, The Milbank quarterly.

[26]  C. Record,et al.  Britain's alcohol market: how minimum alcohol prices could stop moderate drinkers subsidising those drinking at hazardous and harmful levels. , 2009, Clinical medicine.

[27]  A. Zwi,et al.  Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers , 2009, Australia and New Zealand health policy.

[28]  D. Chisholm,et al.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol , 2009, The Lancet.

[29]  Matthew J. Salois,et al.  Effects of beverage alcohol price and tax levels on drinking: a meta-analysis of 1003 estimates from 112 studies. , 2009, Addiction.

[30]  A. Team.  Independent Review of The Effects of Alcohol Pricing and Promotion Part A Systematic Reviews , 2009 .

[31]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis , 2008, Journal of health services research & policy.

[32]  C. Adair,et al.  Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature. , 2007, The Milbank quarterly.

[33]  A. Stevens.  When two dark figures collide: Evidence and discourse on drug-related crime , 2007 .

[34]  J. Lomas.  The in-between world of knowledge brokering , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Vivek Goel,et al.  The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[36]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama. , 2006, Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante.

[37]  Jim McCambridge,et al.  Liver cirrhosis mortality rates in Britain from 1950 to 2002: an analysis of routine data , 2006, The Lancet.

[38]  I. Sanderson.  Complexity, 'practical rationality' and evidence-based policy making , 2006 .

[39]  N. Sheron.  Calling time. The Nation's drinking as a major health issue , 2004 .

[40]  T. Garvin,et al.  Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[41]  I. Sanderson.  Making Sense of ‘What Works’: Evidence Based Policy Making as Instrumental Rationality? , 2002 .

[42]  John N Lavis,et al.  Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[43]  William Solesbury.  The Ascendancy of Evidence , 2002 .

[44]  Mary Godfrey,et al.  What Works: Evidence‐based Policy and Practice in Public Services , 2001 .

[45]  I. Chalmers,et al.  Using evidence to inform health policy: case study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[46]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  How policy informs the evidence , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[47]  R. Baggott.  Public Health : Policy and Politics , 2000 .

[48]  N. Payne.  Authorities and Partisans: the Debate on Unemployment and Health , 1993 .

[49]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[50]  W. Riker.  The art of political manipulation , 1987 .

[51]  C. Weiss.  The many meanings of research utilization. , 1979 .

[52]  Nathan Caplan,et al.  The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization , 1979 .

[53]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[54]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Katikireddi, S., and Hilton, S. (2014) How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? Comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy , 2014 .

[55]  S. Katikireddi.  The relationship between evidence and public health policy: case studies of the English public health white paper and minimum unit pricing of alcohol in Scotland , 2013 .

[56]  Jonathan Stewart‟s.  Alcohol ( Minimum Pricing ) ( Scotland ) , 2011 .

[57]  A. Booth,et al.  Independent review of the effects of alcohol pricing and promotion. Part B: modelling the potential impact of pricing and promotion policies for alcohol in England: results from the Sheffield alcohol policy model. Version 2008(1-1) , 2008 .

[58]  Katherine E. Smith.  Health inequalities in Scotland and England : the translation of ideas between research and policy , 2008 .

[59]  A. Murdoch,et al.  Changing Scotland's relationship with alcohol: a discussion paper on our strategic approach I am pleased to attach a response from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics to the above consultation. , 2008 .

[60]  T. Stockwell,et al.  Alcohol Pricing and Public Health in Canada: Issues and Opportunities , 2006 .

[61]  Michael Marmot,et al.  Calling time: the nation's drinking as a major health issue , 2004 .

[62]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[63]  G. MacDonald,et al.  What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services , 2000 .