An investigation on measurement accuracy of digitizing methods in turbine blade reverse engineering

Measurement and quality control of turbine blades is critical to the successful operation of power plants. It has a key role in manufacturing and reverse engineering. Novel technologies continue to be developed to measure parts with complex geometries, such as turbine blades. Digitizing techniques, using both contact and noncontact methods, are used. Selecting the most appropriate digitizing method for a turbine blade requires consideration of the measuring performance of the alternative methods, including criteria such as accuracy, speed and cost. This study seeks to evaluate the practical accuracy and efficiency of various contact and noncontact digitizing methods through measurement and associated quality control of a complex part, that is, a turbine blade airfoil. Four popular technologies, using distinct underlying measurement methods, were chosen to measure a Frame 5 gas turbine blade, namely, a touch trigger probe mounted on a Zeiss coordinate measuring machine, a touch scanning probe and a spot laser probe separately mounted on Renishaw coordinate measuring machine and a linear laser system from ZScanner. The measured point cloud resulting from each method was then used to reconstruct three-dimensional computer-aided design models of the blade. The accuracy of each measuring system was evaluated against the original blade. The evaluation incorporated a comparative study of design parameters derived from the point cloud and reconstructed surfaces associated with each measurement method. The maximum error of point clouds were −123, 2530 and 2173 µm for the ZScanner linear laser, Renishaw spot laser and Renishaw touch scan, respectively. These measured errors indicated higher accuracy from linear laser method than spot laser scanning and touch scanning methods. Furthermore, the achieved standard deviations of 42, 170 and 269 µm for point clouds of ZScanner linear laser, Renishaw spot laser and Renishaw touch scan, respectively, showed that the manufacturer reported that information cannot be always reliable.

[1]  Basilio Ramos Barbero,et al.  Comparative study of different digitization techniques and their accuracy , 2011, Comput. Aided Des..

[2]  Thomas C. Henderson,et al.  Feature-based reverse engineering of mechanical parts , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[3]  J. M. Anders,et al.  A parametric blade design system: Part I & II , 1999 .

[4]  Cha-Soo Jun,et al.  Parametric design of a part with free-form surfaces , 2006 .

[5]  Khumbulani Mpofu,et al.  Comparison of Weighted Decision Matrix, and Analytical Hierarchy Process for CAD Design of Reconfigurable Assembly Fixture , 2014 .

[6]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Algorithms for reverse engineering boundary representation models , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[7]  Suk-Hwan Suh,et al.  Compensating probe radius in free surface modelling with CMM: simulation and experiment , 1996 .

[8]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  Parametrization for surface fitting in reverse engineering , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[9]  Seokbae Son,et al.  Automated laser scanning system for reverse engineering and inspection , 2002 .

[10]  Takeshi Kishinami,et al.  A New Method for Detecting the Contact Point between a Touch Probe and a Surface , 1989 .

[11]  Wen Wang,et al.  A multi-sensor approach for rapid and precise digitization of free-form surface in reverse engineering , 2015 .

[12]  A. Morris.  Measurement and Instrumentation Principles , 2001 .

[13]  V. V. Petrosov,et al.  Inspection of gas turbine blade blanks , 1959 .

[14]  Jinting Xu,et al.  A surface reconstruction strategy based on deformable template for repairing damaged turbine blades , 2014 .

[15]  Marek Balazinski,et al.  Touch probe radius compensation for coordinate measurement using kriging interpolation , 1997 .

[16]  Alan M. McIvor,et al.  Accurate 3D measurement using a structured light system , 1998, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  David Salomon.  B-Spline Approximation , 2011 .

[18]  Jozef Živčák,et al.  A Comparison of the Outputs of 3D Scanners , 2014 .

[19]  Thomas T. Woodson,et al.  Introduction to engineering design , 1966 .

[20]  Chunhe Gong,et al.  An engineering rules based parameterization approach for turbine blade reverse engineering , 2004, Geometric Modeling and Processing, 2004. Proceedings.

[21]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Gas turbine blade manufacturing by use of epoxy resin tooling and silicone rubber molding techniques , 2011 .

[22]  Eyup Bagci,et al.  Reverse engineering applications for recovery of broken or worn parts and re-manufacturing: Three case studies , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[23]  Amir Abdullah,et al.  Reverse engineering of turbine blades based on design intent , 2007 .

[24]  Amir Abdullah,et al.  Improvement of reverse-engineered turbine blades using construction geometry , 2010 .

[25]  Zhongwei Yin.  Reverse engineering of a NURBS surface from digitized points subject to boundary conditions , 2004, Comput. Graph..

[26]  Lei Chen,et al.  Reverse innovative design - an integrated product design methodology , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[27]  David Salomon,et al.  Curves and surfaces for computer graphics , 2005 .

[28]  Agneta Oden,et al.  A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. , 2006, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[29]  Dinghua Zhang,et al.  Cavity optimization for investment casting die of turbine blade based on reverse engineering , 2010 .

[30]  Basilio Ramos Barbero.  The recovery of design intent in reverse engineering problems , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[31]  Ralph R. Martin,et al.  Reverse engineering of geometric models - an introduction , 1997, Comput. Aided Des..

[32]  Liang-Chia Chen,et al.  Reverse engineering in the design of turbine blades – a case study in applying the MAMDP , 2000 .

[33]  Sunpreet Singh,et al.  Precision investment casting: A state of art review and future trends , 2016 .

[34]  Jens T. Thielemann,et al.  A flexible 3D vision system based on structured light for in-line product inspection , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[35]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  A low cost 3D scanner based on structured light , 2001 .

[36]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Automated dimensional inspection planning using the combination of laser scanner and tactile probe , 2012 .

[37]  John E. Greivenkamp,et al.  Ball tip–stylus tilt correction for a stylus profilometer , 2002 .

[38]  Dinghua Zhang,et al.  Research on Modeling Turbine Blade in Reverse Engineering , 2006 .

[39]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[40]  Yoshimi Ito,et al.  Market Competitiveness Evaluation of Machining Centers by Multidimensional Vectors , 1997 .

[41]  Ye Li,et al.  Scanning data reduction and accuracy enhancement through hybrid probing and bicubic surface construction , 2016 .

[42]  G. Budzik.  The selection criteria of scanning method in process of reproducing an aircraft engine blade geometry , 2007 .

[43]  Zhenhua Xiong,et al.  Probe Radius Compensation of Workpiece Localization , 2003 .

[44]  A. Weckenmann,et al.  Probing Systems in Dimensional Metrology , 2004 .

[45]  C. Bradley,et al.  Advances in the Field of Reverse Engineering , 2005 .